Tweet
Samo ne znam kakve veze to sve ima sa ovom temom,prebacite se u diskusije i slobodno nastavite,nemojte ovdje....
-
Zeljko Malnar-Nocna mora <3
#the return -
Upravo to ;)Originally posted by zdravkelja View Post
Sa ovim se nikako ne mogu sloziti,Federer zna itekako da igra na sljaci i bolji je od Novaka za sad,oce li ga Novak stici i prestici pitanje je,ali da nije bilo Nadal-a Roger bi uzeo par RG-a sigurno ;)Originally posted by draza View Post
Zahvaljujuci Nadal-u je postao mnogo bolji igrac na sljaci nego sto bi bio,u to sam ubijedjen...sigpicComment
-
Federer je 4 puta osvojio Hamburg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Jeste da ne volim da pricam o RG 2009,ali samo da te pitam da li se mogu porediti Nadalov prvi W ili Rogerov prvi RG?Originally posted by Vladan View PostComment
-
Svaka cast na postu, posebno sto tice ovog boldovanog.Originally posted by Vladan View Post
Bio je Federer dosta blizu pobedi u onom epskom finalu 2006 u Rimu. Najmanje nijanse odlucile sampiona tada...Comment
-
FC,ne vidim svrhu uopste tog poredjenja,Roger je osvojio taj RG i to zasluzeno,sve ostalo je nebitno;)
Sto se tice poredjenja izmedju Federera i Novaka na sljaci mislim da su suvisla,Roger je daleko ispred Novaka rezultati su tu i sve govore...Zeljko Malnar-Nocna mora <3
#the returnComment
-
Zasto bi ih poredio?Je li Roger kriv sto je Robin izbacio Nadal-a?Roger je prosao kroz pakao na tom RG-u,znas i sam kako je izvukao mec protiv Haas-a,pa onda i Delpo-a,a bilo je mucenja i sa Acasuso-om ;)Originally posted by FC Nadal View Post
Ja vjerujem da bi Roger volio da je u finalu pobijedio Nadal-a,ali toliko je puta igrao finale,zasluzio ga je itekako!sigpicComment
-
Kakve to sad veze ima?Originally posted by FC Nadal View Post
Hoces da kazes da Fed nije zasluzio svoj RG zato sto se Nadal nije pojavio u finalu?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
-
Ni slucajno.Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
Ja bi iskreno kazem vise volio da je Roger pobjedio Nadal u finalu nego kako je osvojio.Sve je to historija sada.Comment
-
Pa sto si onda potegao to pitanje?Originally posted by FC Nadal View PostNi slucajno.
Ja bi iskreno kazem vise volio da je Roger pobjedio Nadal u finalu nego kako je osvojio.Sve je to historija sada.
A za ovo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Nisam je prvi potegao ovu temu,nego zdravkelja.Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostPa sto si onda potegao to pitanje?
A za ovo
Mozda i jeste smijesno,samo kazem kada bi birao ta dva slucaja,izabrao bi pobjedu protiv Nadala.Comment
-
Roger-ovi navijaci bi izabrali,ali Nadal-ovi,ti?
sigpicComment
-
Originally posted by zdravkelja View PostFederer je i Hamburg dva puta osvajao kada je bio Masters turnir. 4 uzastopna finala RG-a, 3 MC-a, finale Rima... Jako slabo...
RG je osvojio fair and square. To sto Nadal nije pokazao dovoljno dobru igru da se pojavi u finalu nije Rodzerov problem.Koliko ja vidim, zdravkelja je napisao da je Roger zasluzeno osvojio RG, a ti si potegao pitanje njegovog RG-a i Nadalovog prvog Wimbledona.Originally posted by FC Nadal View Posthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Ali znas gdje tu problem Vladane,on ga nikada ne bi pobjedio u tom finalu.
Ja bi svejedno izabrao tu opciju.Comment
.
Comment