Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Znala sam, jer mi se ovde nešto nije slagalo...
    sigpic

    Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
    But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

    Comment


    • Nije ni Za Fekija tačno, malo mi to 12 za njegovu psihičku stabilnost u dužim mečevima

      Comment


      • Federer je na sve gorih 18-16
        Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

        sigpic

        Comment


        • Evoo nekih egzaktnih podataka o tezini uspeha trenutno top 3 igraca u njihovim najboljim sezonama igranjem protiv top 10 igraca
          Rafa- 2010 igrao 9 puta protiv top 10 igraca skor 5 pobeda-4 poraza
          Roger 2004-10-0
          Roger 2005-10-2
          Roger 2006-11-4
          Roger 2007-10-3
          Novak 2011-20-2 sa USO
          Kad malo bolje pogledamo Novak ima vise pobeda protiv prva 4.tenisera (11-2)to ovoj sezoni daje jos vecu velicinu posto svi znamo koliko su trenutno prva 4 tenisera dominantna u odnosu na ostale
          Jos po necemu ce se pamtiti Novak, a to je protiv kakvih je igraca igrao(osvajaca GS)da bi dosao do 4 GS
          AO-2008-SF-Roger Federer 12 GS titula,3-0
          AO-2011-SF-Roger Federer 16 GS titula,3-0
          W -2011--F -Rafael Nadal 10 GS titula,3-1
          USO-2011-SF-Roger Federer 16 GS titula,3-2
          USO-2011-F-Rafael Nadal 10 GS titula,3-1
          Last edited by BOKI1969; 15-09-11, 04:57.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by ClayWarrior View Post
            Federer je na sve gorih 18-16
            Problem sa Fedom je sto kad je dominirao nije skoro uopste igrao meceve u 5 setova jer niko nije mogao da mu uzme 2 seta, tako mi ta statistika uopste nije cudna.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
              Problem sa Fedom je sto kad je dominirao nije skoro uopste igrao meceve u 5 setova jer niko nije mogao da mu uzme 2 seta, tako mi ta statistika uopste nije cudna.
              Hoces da kazes da nije imao dostojne protivnike?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Vanja #66 View Post
                Hoces da kazes da nije imao dostojne protivnike?
                Ne, kad sam to rekla?
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                  Ne, kad sam to rekla?
                  Pa to da je retko kad ulazio u 5. set znaci da mu niko nije mogao nista, dakle to su njemu nedostojni protivnici u tom vremenu... Kako se to drugacije moze objasniti?

                  Comment


                  • Ok, onda i Djokovic ove godine nije imao neke protivnike, nego je imao srece sto su svi van forme ili matori, posto je odigrao samo 1 mec u 5 setova.
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Pa kao i Federer od 2004-2007, nije imao pravog protivnika, sa kojim bi igrao redovno epske meceve i pred koji se ne zna pobednik, sem Nadala na sljaci, a i Nadal ga je vise tad dobijao nego on njega (8-6 za Rafu do kraja 2007, 6-1 na sljaci)...

                      Comment


                      • Sta ti zelis da dokazes, da Federer nije bio toliko dobar, nego nije imao konkurenciju, pa je samo zato imao takve rezultate?
                        I to ti je toliko bitno, da ces i reci da Djokovic nije toliko dobar ove godine nego nije imao protiv koga da igra...

                        A ne moras da mi govoris koji je h2h izmedju Federera i Nadala, znam ja to veoma dobro.
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Ja samo kazem da su toliko bolji od svih ostalih, niti vredjam konkurenciju niti bilo sta, ali kad je neko tako dominantan, onda se obicno kaze: Nema dostojnog protivnika...

                          Kako Fed 2004-2007, tako Nole sad... Nista vise, nista manje.

                          I sacekaj moj odgovor, pa onda razmisljaj o njemu, nemoj da skaces pred rudu, vidis da ne pogadjas sta hocu da kazem...

                          Comment


                          • Kad kazes da nema dostojnu konkurenciju, onda vredjas protivnike, to ujedno znaci da oni nisu jaki, ali samim tim i umanjujes uspehe tog igraca koji je dominirao, nebitno da li je Djokovic ili Federer u pitanju.
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Ne, kad kazes da neko nema dostojnog konkurenta, to znaci da on nema dostojnog konkurenta, bilo to zato sto je on nadmocan ili zato sto su ostali nikakvi... S obzirom da ce se retko kad desiti (prakticno nikad) da svim teniserima na svetu naglo padne forma ili da se svi odjednom mnogo povrede, drugi razlog o nedostojnoj konkurenciji otpada. Ako se sa ovim ne slazes, onda to znaci da imamo drugaciju logiku i ne vredi da dalje nastavlajmo...

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                                Problem sa Fedom je sto kad je dominirao nije skoro uopste igrao meceve u 5 setova jer niko nije mogao da mu uzme 2 seta, tako mi ta statistika uopste nije cudna.
                                Nisam razmisljao o tome, ali stvarno tako deluje..
                                Da li neko iz glave moze da kaze koliko je Federer u svojim najboljim danima (npr. 2003/2009g.), odigrao meceva u 5 setova?
                                Ne pamtim da ih ima za prste i jedne ruke?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X