ulysses ,cestitam ti na postu koji si postavio i nacin na koji vidis upravo ono sto ja celo vreme potenciram ,ne da bih omalovazavao bili ciji uspeh, citiracu jednu tvoju recenicu u kojoj si sve rekao i podrzao moje tvrdnje ,bar ja tako mislim" Opet kažem, nemoj gledati Rogera iz prizme osvajača 16 GS naslova, gledaj ga kao golobradog klinca kojega je Hewitt ubijao. Gledaj ga kao nestabilnog klinca koji u prvom GS finalu igra protiv iskusnog Philipoussisa koji više nego išta želi taj Wimbledon do kojega bi i došao možda da se pred koju godinu nije ozlijedio protiv Samprasa" zavrsetak citata -e sad pogledaj nesrecnog Mareja realno covek ima sve da bude GS sampion ali djaba kad natrci na teniske velicine )Roger ,Rafa,Nole)e sa takvim azdajama Federer nije morao da se bori al mu titulu svakako nije bilo lako osvojiti niti je osvojio na srecu u tom grmu lezi mali zeka;)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by ClayWarrior View PostJeste 1999... tukao ga je dobro a onda je pocetkom drugog seta kliknulo levo koleno i to je bio kraj. Sam Sampras je rekao da ga je Mark nadigrao do tog trenutka i da je imao dosta srece sto ce igrati u 1/2. Naravno, mec se tek zahuktavao ali je Australijanac ocigledno bio spreman da ide do kraja. Mark nikada ranije nije imao problema sa kolenom i mislim da nikada pre nista nije ni predao
Originally posted by ClayWarrior View PostOd onih koji su oko te 1990. zapoceli karijeru i imali dvadesetak godina tu su samo 4 koja si nabrojao
Ne znam, od onih koji su od 1990. naovamo započeli karijeru mi se kao logični odgovori nameću Sampras, Fed, Nadal, Agassi.
Kad sam spominjao Borga, Mcenroea, Lendla i Connorsa nisam naravno mislio da su i oni tada započeli karijeru već čisto tvoje gledište na njih kao na jedne od najboljih ikad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ulysses View PostHvala na odgovoru!
Hvala na neodgovoru!
Ne znam, od onih koji su od 1990. naovamo započeli karijeru mi se kao logični odgovori nameću Sampras, Fed, Nadal, Agassi.
Kad sam spominjao Borga, Mcenroea, Lendla i Connorsa nisam naravno mislio da su i oni tada započeli karijeru već čisto tvoje gledište na njih kao na jedne od najboljih ikad.
Kako bih poredjao Lendla, Mekinroa, Konorsa i Borga? Borg mora ici prvi, zbog svih stvari koje ovde uporno vrtim cesto iz dana u dan.. Borg je u malo drugacijoj situaciji mogao biti cist na prvom mestu uopste ali sta ces
Ja zaista ne znam kako i po cemu razdvojiti Lendla i Konorsa, i pored toga sto je Grozni dobio 17 poslednjih duela koje su odigrali. Oni su po meni cist egal
Na kraju dolazi mozda i najveci genije medju svom cetvoricom ali je ludak u njemu, na zalost, suvise cesto nadvladao njegovu genijalnost i ostavio mu velike mrlje u karijeri. Ipak, sa svojih +70 titula u singlu i dublu i mnogim drugim stvarima koje je postigao, i Dzon moze stati pred svakog igraca koji je ikada igrao tenis, potpuno ravnopravanLast edited by ClayWarrior; 29-07-11, 16:04.Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by ClayWarrior View PostRadim na mladim igracima i analizi turnira koje su igrali najbolji igraci po sezonama, ne mogu sve da vidim
Kako bih poredjao Lendla, Mekinroa, Konorsa i Borga? Borg mora ici prvi, zbog svih stvari koje ovde uporno vrtim cesto iz dana u dan.. Borg je u malo drugacijoj situaciji mogao biti cista na prvom mestu uopste ali sta ces
Ja zaista ne znam kako i po cemu razdvojiti Lendla i Konorsa, i pored toga sto je Grozni dobio 17 poslednjih duela koje su odigrali. Oni su po meni cist egal
Na kraju dolazi mozda i najveci genije medju svom cetvoricom ali je ludak u njemu, na zalost, suvise cesto nadvladao njegovu genijalnost i ostavio mu velike mrlje u karijeri. Ipak, sa svojih +70 titula u singlu i dublu i mnogim drugim stvarima koje je postigao, i Dzon moze stati pred svakog igraca koji je ikada igrao tenis, potpuno ravnopravan
I mislio sam da je tako nekakav odnos snaga među njima četvoricom.
Šteta da Borg nikad nije Australiju igrao.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BOKI1969 View Postulysses ,cestitam ti na postu koji si postavio i nacin na koji vidis upravo ono sto ja celo vreme potenciram ,ne da bih omalovazavao bili ciji uspeh, citiracu jednu tvoju recenicu u kojoj si sve rekao i podrzao moje tvrdnje ,bar ja tako mislim" Opet kažem, nemoj gledati Rogera iz prizme osvajača 16 GS naslova, gledaj ga kao golobradog klinca kojega je Hewitt ubijao. Gledaj ga kao nestabilnog klinca koji u prvom GS finalu igra protiv iskusnog Philipoussisa koji više nego išta želi taj Wimbledon do kojega bi i došao možda da se pred koju godinu nije ozlijedio protiv Samprasa" zavrsetak citata -e sad pogledaj nesrecnog Mareja realno covek ima sve da bude GS sampion ali djaba kad natrci na teniske velicine )Roger ,Rafa,Nole)e sa takvim azdajama Federer nije morao da se bori al mu titulu svakako nije bilo lako osvojiti niti je osvojio na srecu u tom grmu lezi mali zeka;)
Drago mi je da smo se barem malo našli u svim suprostavljenim ali opet i donekle sličnim stavovima.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ulysses View Post
I mislio sam da je tako nekakav odnos snaga među njima četvoricom.
Šteta da Borg nikad nije Australiju igrao.
Bjornu se nije svidjala cinjenica da toliko vremena mora provesti u avionu i biti oko Nove godine na kraju svetaPancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal
sigpic
Comment
-
-
US tennis player Robert Kendrick gets 1-year doping ban after positive test at French Open
LONDON (AP) — Former top-100 player Robert Kendrick of the United States has been suspended for a year by the International Tennis Federation after testing positive for a banned stimulant at the French Open.
After failing the May 22 test, Kendrick said the stimulant got into his system because of a capsule he took to combat jet lag. He denied he was trying to enhance his performance. Kendrick lost in the first round at Roland Garros.
There's something wrong with me chemically
Something wrong with me inherently
The wrong mix in the wrong genes
I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
It was the wrong plan
In the wrong hands
With the wrong theory for the wrong man
The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
The wrong questions with the wrong replies
Comment
-
Ljubicic i Robredo nece igrati u Montrealu, Robredo je povredjen, a Ljubicic zbog privatnih razloga.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Ryan Harrison knows why Roger Federer has been slumping
By Chris Chase
Roger Federer has won 13 more Grand Slams than Ryan Harrison has played in, a fact which didn't stop the 19-year-old American from giving the Swiss tennis great some career advice this week.
Harrison is known for his brash (some would say cocky) attitude on the court. This demeanor sometimes leads to racquet smashing and umpire berating, the former of which occurred during a semifinal loss in Los Angeles on Saturday. When asked about his outbursts, Harrison reminded reporters that Federer used to be known for the same thing during his junior days.
"To be honest with you," Harrison said "Federer, personally, if he had a little more fire, it would help him get back to the top."
He makes a fine point. Critics note that Federer has mellowed in recent years and doesn't seem to live and die with tennis as he once did. Having a wife, twin daughters and a 30th birthday looming will do that to a guy. Maybe if he showed some more passion, he wouldn't be ceding the limelight to Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal.
Be that as it may, Harrison can't be the one saying so. He's 19. He just cracked the top 100 for the first time this week. I have condiments in my fridge that are older than his professional tennis career. What can Ryan Harrison possibly teach to Roger Federer about winning? Paul McCartney may not be writing "Yesterday" anymore but that doesn't mean he needs songwriting tips from Ke$ha, you know?
I don't think Harrison meant anything by the remarks and I sort of love his moxie in saying them. We complain that Federer and Djokovic and Nadal don't say anything interesting in press conferences and then bash Harrison when he does? That's hypocritical.
Aim lower though, Ryan. Wait until you get to the top 10 to take shots at legends.
Zadnja recenica govori svehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment