Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sta bi bilo sa Federerom da nema ovog sistema?

    Pa da stavimo na vagu. Znaci Djokovica bi Medvedev MOGAO da prestigne, a sta bi sa Fedom bilo?
    sloboda ili ništa

    Comment


    • @talicni
      Tebe vise ne citam, ja vidim samo nabacane reci bez ikakvog reda, kad naucis da koristis veliko slovo, mozemo da pricamo.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by gomila nesklada View Post
        Sta bi bilo sa Federerom da nema ovog sistema?

        Pa da stavimo na vagu. Znaci Djokovica bi Medvedev MOGAO da prestigne, a sta bi sa Fedom bilo?
        Bio bi van top 200, nemam pojma ni ja koji bi bio.

        A da ja tebe pitam nesto, da li je bitnije koji je Federer ili je bitnije ko je no.1 i da postoji mogucnost da dodje do smene na vrhu?
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • To je opet spin i ne razumem bas pitanje. Diskutujemo kome je vise pomoglo Federeru ili Djokovicu, pa su obe stvari podjenako bitne za temu.

          Dakle, Djokovic bi bio i dalje prvi, ali bi bio ugrozeniji, tj. Medvedev bi ranije imao sansu da dodje do prvog mesta. Federer bi bio 200 i neki, ne znas ni ti koji, a sad je 6.

          Nek kazemo da je obojici pomoglo, mislim da je nemerljivo kome je vise, ne treba neka velika pamet da se to zakljuci.
          sloboda ili ništa

          Comment


          • Niko ni ne govori da Federeru nije vise pomoglo, tj. da mu je najvise pomoglo, kad sam ja napisala suprotno?
            Ali isto tako ste se vi uhvatili za Federera i kako bi on bio ko zna koji na listi, ali se pravite slepi da bi Djokovic vec sad bio ugrozen na prvom mestu, da bi itekako bio ugrozen na prvom mestu tokom sljake.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Pa ti si pisala, parafraziram, 'da ovo odgovara Federeru ili Nadalu, da budu prvi na svetu, ovde bi se pominjali Cia, Vatikan, zavere' ne pominjuci tada da vise odgovara Federeru.

              Ne pravim se slep, rado cu o tome diskutovati kada bude sezona sljake i ako Djokovic bude 'nezasluzeno' prvi. Mada, tesko da ce Medvedev uspeti da napravi neke rezultate na prasini.
              sloboda ili ništa

              Comment


              • Ovo prvo bi se sigurno desilo, bukvalno mogu ruku, nogu i glavu da stavim.


                A druga stvar, Nadala niko ne spominje, a on bi bio no.5, sezona na sljaci samo sto nije pocela. Mislim da je to mnogo bitnije, nego gde se nalazi Federer, jer je po vama on bivsi igrac, penzioner koji jedva da moze da potrci.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • roŽEa si se uhvatila ti i da ga ne spominjes toliko već bi ga zaboravili
                  Wizard

                  Comment


                  • Razlika između No.5 i No 200 je kao između kupatila i poljskog WCa.
                    Originally posted by Casiraghi
                    Al bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
                    Originally posted by Casiraghi
                    Ti nikad neces biti kao Joel Matip.

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj_G6ExBTE
                    Originally posted by Casiraghi
                    Srecan Mane svima koji slave.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by MareLFC View Post
                      Razlika između No.5 i No 200 je kao između kupatila i poljskog WCa.
                      Razlika je sto Federer ne moze nista da uradi na RGu i totalno je nebitan, a to da li je Nadal no.5 pa moze da dodje vec u QF ili 3.,4. pa moze u SF ili 2. pa moze tek u finalu...e to je razlika izmedju kupatila i poljskog WCa
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Može da uradi na WBu i itekako je bitan
                        Originally posted by Casiraghi
                        Al bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
                        Originally posted by Casiraghi
                        Ti nikad neces biti kao Joel Matip.

                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj_G6ExBTE
                        Originally posted by Casiraghi
                        Srecan Mane svima koji slave.

                        Comment


                        • Ja kao Novakov navijac mogu samo da se slozim sa Bojanom. Federerov renking trenutno uopste nije bitan. Jedino ce mozda da mu znaci ako ostane medju osam na Wimbledonu. Doduse sa druge strane Rodzer nije imao srece da su bas sada ukinuli onu formulu po kojoj su racunali nosioce na Wimbedonu i po kojoj bi on svakako zasluzio da bude medju osam.

                          Sa druge strane Novak i Rafa mogu mnogo vise da profitiraju. Realno da bi Medvedev skinuo Novaka sa prvog mesta do Wimbledona morace da bude dobar makar kao Novak, a van betona to ce biti jako tesko. Rafi sa druge strane je jako bitno sto je medju cetiri. Plus sto ce sada sigurno da izbegne Tima pre finala. Da se ne lazemo i Rafi je zreb na RGu mnogo bitan. Mozda deluje da je veliki favorit protiv svih, ali ako se neki mec oduzi moglo bi biti problema. To smo najbolje videli protiv Cicipasa u Australiji. Tako da po meni njemu su najvece sanse da pobedjuje u tri seta ili u kratka cetiri seta. Tako da ako bi trebao recimo da veze Zvereva (ili Cicipasa) pa Tima i Novaka koji su u formi bilo bi jako tesko. Uostalom kladionice daju Rafi oko 50% ( ili cak malo mane) na RGu sto je po meni sasvim realno.

                          Comment


                          • Nadam se da moze, ali i dalje ne menja cinjenicu da niko ne spominje Nadala i njegovu poziciju pred sezonu na sljaci.
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Potpuno nerazumevanje materije i spinovnje. Sa ovim novim 50% pravilom je noletu manje vise isto kao i prije. Tek ako se gleda cijela slika i uporedi sa standardnim pravilima je meda noletu na par stotina poena. Sto moze potencionalno da noletu izvuce koju sedmicu na potezu recimo vimbldon - US turneja, gdje meda brani pno vise. Sa druge strane je nole ovim promijenama vec ostecen 22 sedmice. I sada je problem sto ce mu mozda sistem koji mu je uzeo 22 sedmice vratiti neki dio toga. I to veliko mozda a 22 sedmice su mu uzete u startu.

                              Comment


                              • talicni nasao veliko slovo

                                Ako pircamo da je Federer sad realno oko 600. mesta, onda moramo da pricamo i o tome da je Medvedev trenutno 335 poena iza Djokovica, sto znaci da posle Majami vec moze da dodje do promene na prvom mestu.
                                A sto se tice 50% poena, to izuzetno odgovara Djokovicu jer on ne mora ni da pipne reket, a sa sljakastih mastersa i RGa ima 1600 poena. Medvedev moze samo da sanja da osvoji toliko poena na sljaci, jer on trenutno sa sljakastih turnira ima nekih 800 poena, a to dalje znaci da Djokovic moze da igra opusteno i bez pritiska rankinga.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X