Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LosmiSK View Post
    Ko je big 3 Nadal,Djokovic i? Aludiras na Federera al on nije osvojio turnir godinama..
    Znaci da mu uzmemo ovih 100+ titula koje je osvojio do sad?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Prvo slem Medo treba da osvoji, a to ako se kad uopšte i desi, imat će pošten sistem

      Comment


      • Ma nije samo do Medvedeva, kako ce mladji da se probijaju kad ovi imaju zagarantovane poene, ne moraju ni da igraju
        Narednih 18 meseci ce vaziti ovaj sistem, tek kad dodje Sinsinati 2022. onda ce biti na snazi stari, normalni sistem gde se gledaju poslednje 52 nedelje.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Imaju normalan sistem godinama, pa niko nit je primirisao prvom mjestu niti se igrački približio, mimo Thiema, ovima najboljima

          Nijedan sistem nekoga kvalitetnoga neće spriječiti da se probije u vrh ako to igrama zaslužuje.

          Sad će malo teže do love, pa možda počnu bolje trenirati

          Comment


          • Budi malo realan, vuku se poeni iz 2019. godine, a sad smo u 2021.
            Sta je smetalo da od nedelje posle Dubaija pocnu sa normalni skidanjem poena, tour se skroz vratio, regularno igraju turnire i osvajaju poene...jedini veliki turnir koji je odlozen je IW, a prezivece sa jednim mastersom manje.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Postoji li neko racionalno objasnjenje za ovu glupost?
              sigpic

              Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
              But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

              Comment


              • Pa realan sam, sistem jeste kretenski, ali šta to nije kao što bi trebalo biti trenutno?

                Nolo najbolji na svijetu? Jeste i prvi je.

                Ovi iza njega svi poredani kako i treba da budu poredani. Ok, Federer bi trebao biti niže, ali po kvalitetu svakako pripada tu gdje jeste.

                Neko od nekih novih mladih igrača prikazuje neke nevjerovatne partije, a sistem mu ne da naprijed? Nope.

                Karatsev popravio ranking za 1000 mjesta, odigraš kako treba i sistem će prepoznati kakav god da je.

                Comment


                • Nebitno je sto je Roger kvalitetan, posle Dubaija su trebali da pocnu da skidaju poene, u krajnjem ovo ce poprilicno da utice i na sam zreb i ko sa kim moze da se sretne u uvodnim rundama.
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Čekaj, znači Rafa ako izgubi u 1.kolu RGa ili Novak u 1.kolu WBa, ostaju im 1000 poena?
                    Originally posted by Casiraghi
                    Al bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
                    Originally posted by Casiraghi
                    Ti nikad neces biti kao Joel Matip.

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj_G6ExBTE
                    Originally posted by Casiraghi
                    Srecan Mane svima koji slave.

                    Comment


                    • Izgubit će od Baene u prvom kolu

                      Suštinski se ništa ne mijenja, ranking je samo broj, nivo igre je bitan

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by MareLFC View Post
                        Čekaj, znači Rafa ako izgubi u 1.kolu RGa ili Novak u 1.kolu WBa, ostaju im 1000 poena?
                        Da.
                        Isto tako, sta god da urade u Rimu i Madridu, Djokovic ima 1000 poena, a Nadal 680.
                        Ne kazem da ja oni nece da ostvare bolje rezultate, ali mogu da taktiziraju, da preskacu turnire itd.
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Nisam bas ispratio, jel ovo znaci da mogu dva igraca da imaju po 1000 poena sa jednog istog turnira(Mastersa)?
                          Last edited by mark !t zer0; 05-03-21, 12:33.
                          sloboda ili ništa

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by gomila nesklada View Post
                            Nisam bas ispratio, jel ovo znaci da mogu dva igraca da imaju po 1000 poena sa jednog istog turnira?
                            Da, recimo Nadal je osvojio Rim 2019., a Djokovic 2020., obojici je zagarantovano 500 poena.
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                              Da.
                              Isto tako, sta god da urade u Rimu i Madridu, Djokovic ima 1000 poena, a Nadal 680.
                              Ne kazem da ja oni nece da ostvare bolje rezultate, ali mogu da taktiziraju, da preskacu turnire itd.
                              E, svašta.
                              Originally posted by Casiraghi
                              Al bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
                              Originally posted by Casiraghi
                              Ti nikad neces biti kao Joel Matip.

                              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj_G6ExBTE
                              Originally posted by Casiraghi
                              Srecan Mane svima koji slave.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by shminka View Post
                                Ovi iza njega svi poredani kako i treba da budu poredani. Ok, Federer bi trebao biti niže, ali po kvalitetu svakako pripada tu gdje jeste.
                                Nisam bas siguran za taj kvalitet u ovom trenutku. Jer smisao ATP liste jeste da rangira igrace po kvalitetu u tekucem trenutku, pa nisam siguran da Federer treba da ima prednost u zrebu u odnosu na Cicipasa, Zvereva, Rubljeva itd... prakticno mu 'preko veze' daju vetar u ledja.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X