Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Samo da ovo sve ovako hoce ostat 9 igraca od 125 ne igra, to je realno odlicno. Samo da hoce krenuti konacno

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
      Joker, nisu ni Vavrinku spomenuli, a on je bivsi sampion.
      Je li moguce da si ovo stavila u ravan sa Rafinim otkazivanjem u zadnjem momentu? Stan, za kog se vec odavno zna da nece ucestvovati, koji je jednom osvojio taj turnir... a ovamo imas cetvorostrukog AKTUELNOG sampiona! Ej, AKTUELNOG! On brani titulu!!! I ti mi pominjes Vavrinku kao primjer, kao sve je to isto.. Sta je s tobom, Bojana??

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Joker View Post
        Je li moguce da si ovo stavila u ravan sa Rafinim otkazivanjem u zadnjem momentu? Stan, za kog se vec odavno zna da nece ucestvovati, koji je jednom osvojio taj turnir... a ovamo imas cetvorostrukog AKTUELNOG sampiona! Ej, AKTUELNOG! On brani titulu!!! I ti mi pominjes Vavrinku kao primjer, kao sve je to isto.. Sta je s tobom, Bojana??

        Valjda zbog prevelike zabrinutosti posto kovidiša nije pod kontrolom i raste broj slucajeva u svijetu

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Joker View Post
          Je li moguce da si ovo stavila u ravan sa Rafinim otkazivanjem u zadnjem momentu? Stan, za kog se vec odavno zna da nece ucestvovati, koji je jednom osvojio taj turnir... a ovamo imas cetvorostrukog AKTUELNOG sampiona! Ej, AKTUELNOG! On brani titulu!!! I ti mi pominjes Vavrinku kao primjer, kao sve je to isto.. Sta je s tobom, Bojana??
          Pa i za Nadala se vec duze vreme zna da nece igrati, nisu spomenuli niti jednog igraca koji je otkazao, osim Feda koji je otkazao celu sezonu.
          Dakle, resili su da pricaju o igracima koji ce igrati, a ne o onima koji nece.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
            Pa i za Nadala se vec duze vreme zna da nece igrati..
            Ej, stvarno necu dalje. Ti si toliko voljna relativizovati stvari i mutiti vodu, da stvarno ne zelim da se rvam u blatu. Zaboravi.. sve se ovo znalo, svi smo ovo znali, nista novo... bravo!

            Comment


            • Ma spomenuli su Feda zato sto su htjeli da naglase da razlog njegovo neigranja nije KOVIDIŠA vec je covjek davnih dana otkazao sve da ne bi ko pomislio da ne zeli da putuje. A ove sto se plase kove i ne treba pominjat, pametni su ovi iz USO jer ne zasluzuju da ih se spomene a i nanose stetu samom turniru
              Last edited by DinoFC; 04-08-20, 20:04.

              Comment


              • Lajovic ima najbolje ime

                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Evo prilike za next gen da osvoje slem, posto nema Nadala.Ako to ne bude Novak, navijam da Tim uzme.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                    Je l ovo stvarno Raonic?
                    Gledam sliku i ne mogu da verujem [emoji44][emoji44]

                    José Morgado


                    Diego Schwartzman diactivated the comments, as people just couldn’t contain themselves about Milos’ shape. Fognini suggested Milos ‘ate an elefant’ during quarantine.

                    Well done, Diego.
                    Wizard

                    Comment


                    • Ocekivana odluka Nadala.

                      Varaju se svi koji misle da ce USO biti lak posao za Novaka. Medvedev, Tim, Zverev, Agut i Cicipas su tu. I svaki od njih je nezgodniji za Novaka od Nadala. Forma svih njih, ukljucujuci i Novaka, je velika nepoznata. Kao i uvijek, za Novaka ce puno zavisiti od zrijeba.

                      Comment


                      • A i ako uzme titulu biće osporavana.
                        Kao nema Federera i Nadala. Ovaj prvi sigurno ne bi ni igrao jer je čovek povređen a ovaj drugi na betonu protiv Novaka teško da šta može da uradi.

                        Ali džaba sve to, jer šta bi bilo da je Fed igrao na jednoj nozi i pokosio ga govno... Uvek će taj GS imati manju vrednost zbog ovog sranja i hipotetičkih naglabanja.
                        There's something wrong with me chemically
                        Something wrong with me inherently
                        The wrong mix in the wrong genes
                        I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
                        It was the wrong plan
                        In the wrong hands
                        With the wrong theory for the wrong man
                        The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
                        The wrong questions with the wrong replies

                        Comment


                        • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by NI View Post
                            Ocekivana odluka Nadala.

                            Varaju se svi koji misle da ce USO biti lak posao za Novaka. Medvedev, Tim, Zverev, Agut i Cicipas su tu. I svaki od njih je nezgodniji za Novaka od Nadala. Forma svih njih, ukljucujuci i Novaka, je velika nepoznata. Kao i uvijek, za Novaka ce puno zavisiti od zrijeba.
                            Igraču sa 17 GS titula i toliko trofeja na betonu "kao i uvek zavisi od žreba"?

                            Šta sve neću pročitati...

                            Jimmy, znači više od pola karijere Rogera možemo da osporimo... Mislim u poređenju njih trojice ja to i radim, ako se gleda ko je od njih trojice bolji onda je fer gledati samo vremenski period kad su igrali sva trojica, tj. bili aktivni u karijeri.
                            Last edited by Ljubitelj tenisa; 05-08-20, 14:06.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Ljubitelj tenisa View Post
                              Jimmy, znači više od pola karijere Rogera možemo da osporimo... Mislim u poređenju njih trojice ja to i radim, ako se gleda ko je od njih trojice bolji onda je fer gledati samo vremenski period kad su igrali sva trojica, tj. bili aktivni u karijeri.
                              Nadal je igrao W 2003.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                                Nadal je igrao W 2003.
                                Nema veze, nije igrao Đoković. Nemoj mnogo da se kurobecaš jer možemo da gledamo i period kad su stasali ko igrači pa ti miljenik ode daleko ispod crte...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X