Samo da ovo sve ovako hoce ostat 9 igraca od 125 ne igra, to je realno odlicno. Samo da hoce krenuti konacno
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostJoker, nisu ni Vavrinku spomenuli, a on je bivsi sampion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joker View PostJe li moguce da si ovo stavila u ravan sa Rafinim otkazivanjem u zadnjem momentu? Stan, za kog se vec odavno zna da nece ucestvovati, koji je jednom osvojio taj turnir... a ovamo imas cetvorostrukog AKTUELNOG sampiona! Ej, AKTUELNOG! On brani titulu!!! I ti mi pominjes Vavrinku kao primjer, kao sve je to isto.. Sta je s tobom, Bojana??
Valjda zbog prevelike zabrinutosti posto kovidiša nije pod kontrolom i raste broj slucajeva u svijetu
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joker View PostJe li moguce da si ovo stavila u ravan sa Rafinim otkazivanjem u zadnjem momentu? Stan, za kog se vec odavno zna da nece ucestvovati, koji je jednom osvojio taj turnir... a ovamo imas cetvorostrukog AKTUELNOG sampiona! Ej, AKTUELNOG! On brani titulu!!! I ti mi pominjes Vavrinku kao primjer, kao sve je to isto.. Sta je s tobom, Bojana??
Dakle, resili su da pricaju o igracima koji ce igrati, a ne o onima koji nece.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
-
Ma spomenuli su Feda zato sto su htjeli da naglase da razlog njegovo neigranja nije KOVIDIŠA vec je covjek davnih dana otkazao sve da ne bi ko pomislio da ne zeli da putuje. A ove sto se plase kove i ne treba pominjat, pametni su ovi iz USO jer ne zasluzuju da ih se spomene a i nanose stetu samom turniruLast edited by DinoFC; 04-08-20, 21:04.
Comment
-
Lajovic ima najbolje ime
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostJe l ovo stvarno Raonic?
Gledam sliku i ne mogu da verujem [emoji44][emoji44]
Diego Schwartzman diactivated the comments, as people just couldn’t contain themselves about Milos’ shape. Fognini suggested Milos ‘ate an elefant’ during quarantine.
Well done, Diego.Wizard
Comment
-
Ocekivana odluka Nadala.
Varaju se svi koji misle da ce USO biti lak posao za Novaka. Medvedev, Tim, Zverev, Agut i Cicipas su tu. I svaki od njih je nezgodniji za Novaka od Nadala. Forma svih njih, ukljucujuci i Novaka, je velika nepoznata. Kao i uvijek, za Novaka ce puno zavisiti od zrijeba.
Comment
-
A i ako uzme titulu biće osporavana.
Kao nema Federera i Nadala. Ovaj prvi sigurno ne bi ni igrao jer je čovek povređen a ovaj drugi na betonu protiv Novaka teško da šta može da uradi.
Ali džaba sve to, jer šta bi bilo da je Fed igrao na jednoj nozi i pokosio ga govno... Uvek će taj GS imati manju vrednost zbog ovog sranja i hipotetičkih naglabanja.There's something wrong with me chemically
Something wrong with me inherently
The wrong mix in the wrong genes
I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
It was the wrong plan
In the wrong hands
With the wrong theory for the wrong man
The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
The wrong questions with the wrong replies
Comment
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostOcekivana odluka Nadala.
Varaju se svi koji misle da ce USO biti lak posao za Novaka. Medvedev, Tim, Zverev, Agut i Cicipas su tu. I svaki od njih je nezgodniji za Novaka od Nadala. Forma svih njih, ukljucujuci i Novaka, je velika nepoznata. Kao i uvijek, za Novaka ce puno zavisiti od zrijeba.
Šta sve neću pročitati...
Jimmy, znači više od pola karijere Rogera možemo da osporimo... Mislim u poređenju njih trojice ja to i radim, ako se gleda ko je od njih trojice bolji onda je fer gledati samo vremenski period kad su igrali sva trojica, tj. bili aktivni u karijeri.Last edited by Ljubitelj tenisa; 05-08-20, 15:06.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ljubitelj tenisa View PostJimmy, znači više od pola karijere Rogera možemo da osporimo... Mislim u poređenju njih trojice ja to i radim, ako se gleda ko je od njih trojice bolji onda je fer gledati samo vremenski period kad su igrali sva trojica, tj. bili aktivni u karijeri.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment