Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Знам да то звучи “вери фани”
    ал, ево размисли и стани.
    Па реци: је*у га а он не може да се брани.
    Да ли су деди прошли дани?

    Или је деда уп’о у кризу
    па не зна да му је крај дошао
    јадан мисли да није ни близу
    не разуме да је одавно прошао …

    Но нема везе нек се копрца
    кад неће на време да се преда
    то Ноле воли својски да пр*а
    а изгледа да исто воли и деда.

    Дај онда деда немој да стајеш
    слава и титуле тако су глупе
    ништа се не може мерити с тиме
    када своју гу*ицу дајеш
    када га својски примаш у **** ….

    Трпај Ноле кад ти се нуди
    егзекутор дедине гу*ице буди
    да те славимо ко шампиона
    највећег краља тениског трона!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by notorious View Post
      Zanimljivo je i ono poslije polufinala USO 2011, ali ništa to nije protiv Novaka i Maxx-a je paranoik
      da se mi vratimo temi... sta kazes na ono kada se naknadno sjetio da je u mecu sa noletom na OZIju 2008. imao mononukleozu. iako je poslije tog OZIja odigrao vjerovatno najgusci raspored u svojoj karijeri: dubai-iw-majami-estoril-mc-rim-hamburg-rg-hale-vimbl.... cudnovata je to bolest. neki zavrse karijere a neki pojacaju raspored igranja.

      a znate li za ono kad je s izvesnim vavom igrao 4 sata to je bio rat. isle mu stalno lopte jake al je stizao na svake kad vavrinku je zadesio jad. svega je tu tada bilo, pa se ono dogodilo sto je mirku proslavilo tad.

      e poslije je dao WO noletu u finalu jer se nije oporavio, vadio se na ledja ali ga to nije sprijecilo da nakon 4 dana igra u 3 dana 3 meca u 3 dobijena. ko da je on srbin a ne nole.
      Last edited by talicni; 21-03-19, 20:20.

      Comment


      • nego ne vidjeh da ste prokomentalisali jednu drugu njegovu izjavu ovih dana. za neke svajcarske novine.

        preuzeto sa MTFa (ako nije dobar prevod nije do mene)

        Federer stated the following to a Swiss journalist after his loss against Thiem:

        "I often play while in pain. I don't want to pretend like its otherwise. Me and Nadal are definitely two players who played the most matches while in pain. I just have a different approach than Nadal. Its useless to talk about the pain. On the contrary: It only helps the opponent."

        https://www.watson.ch/sport/tennis/6...-mit-schmerzen

        imati na umu da je taj poraz od tima dosao nakon onog WO od rafe
        Last edited by talicni; 21-03-19, 20:17.

        Comment


        • Zato sto su ga pitali

          Meni se cini da ovde niko ne shvata da njega novinari pitaju sve i svasta i da on na to odgovara, a svaki put se trudi da zaista da odgovor, a ne da daje neke genericke. Ali dzabe ja to ovde pricam, jer umesto da se analizira njegova izjava, analizira se njegov karakter, zena i itd.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • pa da logicno. on ne prica o bolu i misli da je tako najbolje jer bi to samo pomoglo oponentu ali istovremeno sa sigurnoscu zna da su upravo on i rafa igraci koji najvise igraju pod bolom! ali on nije kao rafa pa da prica o tome (a sta ako i drugi ne pricaju kako onda on to definitivno zna da su bas njih 2 igrali najvise pod bolovima ili on sigurno zna da je jedini koji ne prica o tome jer je valjda pametniji od svih ostalih koji ne kontaju da tako pomazu oponentima? i sta je recimo sa potrom?). i to komentarise bas eto nakon sto je dobio WO od rafe zbog bolova ovoga u koljenu. i nije li cijela izjava kontradikcija sama sebi? ja sam definitivno onaj koji najvise igra pod bolom, ne zelim da se pretvaram da nije tako ali sam i onaj koji nikada ne prica o svojim problemima sa bolom jer bih pomogao protivnicima. za razliku od drugih koji pricaju o tome. ma vazi!
            Last edited by talicni; 21-03-19, 21:01.

            Comment


            • Nije problem sto on odgovara nego nacin na koji on to radi. Jednu stvar mozes reci na vise nacina to zavisi od same licnosti. Branis nesto sto je neobranjivo.

              Comment


              • A sto volim tu recenicu: branis neodbranjivo...to se napise i to je onda to, kraj, nema dalje

                ma ni necu da branim, oni koji se bas razumeju su rekli svoje, meni dosta
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Upravo si potvrdila ono sto sam rekao. Imas pravo da spinujes ali opet masis sustinu. Politicka korektnost, sta to bese?

                  Comment


                  • Kakvo spinovanje, ja sam dala svoje misljenje i stojim iza toga, nisam analizirala Fedov karakter kao vi
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Kako nije spinovanje kada se od celog mog posta uhvatila za zadnju recenicu koja je tu forme radi. Sustina je da je on sve ovo mogao reci na mnogo korektniji nacin. I naravno da to ima sa veze sa samom licnoscu nema sta tu da se analizira.

                      Comment


                      • nadji mi tacno sta ovde nije korektno, ali lepo odslusaj ceo odgovor, nije dugo, 1 minut

                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Toni Nadal:Ne mogu svi da budu kao Mesi,Djokovic i Federer
                          https://www.b92.net/sport/tenis/vest...nav_id=1520852

                          Comment


                          • Opet spinujes, imas moj odgovor na 1232 strani. Procitaj ako nisi, ne treba ti vise od 10 sekundi.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by skeptik View Post
                              Opet spinujes, imas moj odgovor na 1232 strani. Procitaj ako nisi, ne treba ti vise od 10 sekundi.
                              Procitala sam ga i daj ozbiljan teniski odgovor, a ne ono
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • ma samo da je rekao kako je rekao bez dodatka o cenel slemu. i tome kako je borg uradio najveci moguci i najtezi teniski izazov osvojivsi RG pa vimbl. nit ga je ko pitao o tome niti je to teze uraditi od nole slema. i opet je sam sebi kontradiktoran. kaze vidimo da je sada osvojiti 4 u nizu mnogo lakse nego prije, pa kao dokaz tvrdnji- evo nole moze to da uradi po 2 put a ja sam bio blizu i rafa pa pominje cenel slem kao ultimativni izazov i navodi borga koji je ono uradio 3 puta, (rafa 2 i on 1 ali nije nole), sa zenama ih je 10ak koji su to uspjeli i bog te pita koliko ih je bilo blizu onako kao sto su on ili jos gore rafa 4 u nizu (marej je recimo igrao finale RGa pa osvoji vimbl).

                                sta ti je propaganda:
                                http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1054247.shtml
                                Last edited by talicni; 21-03-19, 21:33.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X