Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by NEMANJA97 View Post
    ATP 500 je od 2009 , ali traje to još od ranije , ali je imala druge nazive. Opet najbitnije da su bili sve vreme tu dok su imali Federera, Nadala i Noleta koji jedni od najboljih. Zato posle kad se odjedanput pojavi ta kategorija tu ne znam kako će je ubaciti
    Nije tacno, nisu svi turniri bili uniformisani i nisu svi nosili 500 poena, a i neki turniri su se igrali best of 5 u finalu. Fed je osvojio Bazel 2006., turnir je ja mislim nosio 300 poena, to je bilo pre onog dupliranja, plus je finale bilo best of 5.

    Tako da, kao sto su duplirali poene, kao sto su izjednacili turnire i podelili ih u 250 i 500, tako mogu i da naprave seriju 750.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Znam da nisu svi pre te 2009 vredeli 500, ali nije to bila poenta nego mi je sad bespotrebno izdvajati 3 ili 4 turnira da vrede 750. Mogu da se posvete nekim drugim bitnijim stvarima, a ne tome oko turnira što sad ima dobar raspored.

      Comment


      • Pa dobro, recimo Hamburg koji se igra posle W nosi 500 poena, a konkurencija je smesna i Bazel isto nosi 500 poena, a konkurencija je bas jaka. Turniri koji imaju jake igrace i koji daju ogromne pare zele da se nekako izdvoje, meni je to skroz logicno i sasvim ok.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Ma to je po mom mišljenju bespotrebno komplikovanje kalendara koji je trenutno jasno podeljen. Ko sad što ima u ženskom kalendaru. Zato i kažem da sigurno ima bitnijih stvari koji bi mogli da se poboljšaju.
          Jer sad ako od tih 500 izdvojimo 3 ili 4 onda će i oni iz 250 sigurno se naći nekoliko njih koji će želeti da se izdvoje iz grupe od 250 gde ih ima puno.

          Comment


          • Što se tiče mastersa na travi, ja bih to dao Kvinsu, imaju najbolju travu nebo i zemlja u odnosu na Hale

            Comment


            • Ja to ne vidim kao neko veliko komplikovanje kalendara
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Meni jeste ko sad kad žene igraju moram da uđem i proverim koliko turnir vredi da bih bio siguran koliko je bitan. Jer kalendar je vrlo jednostavan pa ga zato znam otprilike
                Ja sam uvek za to nešto što je dobro , a zašto bi se to moralo bilo kako komplikovati?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Lord Aleksoni View Post
                  Što se tiče mastersa na travi, ja bih to dao Kvinsu, imaju najbolju travu nebo i zemlja u odnosu na Hale
                  I ja sam takođe za Kvins

                  Comment


                  • Ne mogu ni Kvins ni Hale, nemaju oni dovoljno terena da bi bili mastersi
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Pošto ove sezone mnogi imaju priliku da upadnu u top10, jel vidite možda da ćemo imati do kraja sezone još neko novo lice u 10?

                      Comment


                      • Tu su samo Bautista Agut i Querrey realni da ulete. Eventualno Kyrgios, ali sumnjam. Dao bih sansu velikom Samu.

                        Comment


                        • Kveri je trenutno na 10-tom mestu u trci za London, a i bitan je detalj da je tu deveti Nole koji ima svega 150 poena.
                          Tako da se meni čini da je za Kverija samo pitanje trenutka, a i slažem da još jedino neke šanse ima Agut.

                          Comment


                          • Djokovica i Wawrinku ne gledaj na race listi, oni su trenutno nebitni.
                            Kao sto je zdravkelja rekao, Kveri je najveci kandidat, pa onda Agut, Kirijos isto ima sansu, ali on ce se smoriti u nekom trenutku
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Ma ne gledam Noleta i Stena za London. Znam da oni tamo svejedno neće igrati nego sam gledao rejs listu jer ona krajem godine i bolje merilo jer nema tu oduzimanja bodova.
                              Zašto sam spomenuo Noleta? Ma iz skroz nebitnog razloga jer sam hteo naglasiti pošto je tu Kveri deseti , a pošto je Nole deveti. Samim tim se vidi da je i na klasičnoj listi vrlo blizu ulaska u 10.
                              Sad sam baš analizirao rang Kverija i Aguta kroz karijeru i baš mislim da im je sad nikad bolja prilika da uđe u 10.
                              Kyrgiosa nisam spominjao jer još dalje na listi , a opet svi znamo kako se ponaša.
                              Ipak ima dosta prostora do kraja kad se pogleda lista tu imamo Nadala i Federera u top2 posle toga Zverev, Čilić, Tim, Dimitrov u top6, a ostatak top10 tu je sve moguće , a razlike su baš male pa mnogi imaju priliku.
                              Last edited by NEMANJA97; 12-09-17, 16:13.

                              Comment


                              • Pa nema puno njih sanse da upadne u top 10, posebno sto je kraj sezone, nema jos toliko poena da se podeli
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X