Možda je kao navijač, pokušao da objasni zašto je Miloš to izjavio a praksa pokazuje da je nemoguće oporaviti se od takve povrede za tako kratko vreme.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Nije Raonic ni prvi ni poslednji koji se nije osecao sposobnim za borbu protiv spremnijeg kada proceni da su sanse na sledecem turniru ugrozene.Tihi oportunizam(potkrepljen odgovarajucom med.dokumentacijiom) ocigledno prolazi kod ATPa.
Federer i predaja finalnog meca na WTF2014 pa igranje finala DC u kratkom periodu , nije to bilo tako davno .
Milosevo dodavanje dramatike pricom o rupturi kvadricepsa, nekom moze zvucati kao odbrambeni mehanizam, los PR, ali sustinski ne menja stvari.
Sto se ove izjave , koliko vidim covek je rekao da povreda onako kako je nazvana (u Raonicevoj izjavi o razlozima povlacenja) ne moze da se zaleci za kratak vremenski period, to je opstepoznato i medicinskim laicimaSimilis simili gaudet
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostJa imam odgovor, sigurno je bio povredjen, nije hteo da rizikuje da bi bio spremniji za London.
Originally posted by torpedo View PostMedicina je čudo
Mlad je on, naučiće bolje lagati.
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostKoliko ja znam, ATPov doktor mora da potvrdi povredu, sto znaci da je nekoliko doktora pogresno reklo Raonicu u cemu je problem, jer Raonic je samo teniser, on moze samo da ponovi ono sto su mu rekli doktori.
A ako cemo o teoriji zavere, Djokovic, njegovo ponasanje i rezultati su mnogo sumnjiviji od Raoniceve predaje.
Doping znaci kod Novaka, prevali slobodno, tastatura trpi sve Bojana.
I samo jos ovo ako zelis, kad si slusala licno Momu na radiju da li se iz njegovih usta cula rec LAZE Raonic?
Poz
Послато са SM-N9005 уз помоћ Тапатока
Comment
-
@cacanin
Da, iz njegovih usta sam cula:Raonic laze, radio s2 je u pitanju, negde posle 12h je bila njegova izjava, ako nekako mozes a ti proveri.
Nisam ja rekla doping niti sam mislila, pogresno si razumeo, procitaj ponovo, a mozes i Vladanov post da procitas.
Sent from my Z3 compact <3http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Average forehand speeds 2016
Thiem 81 mph
Djokovic 78
Nishikori 78
Wawrinka 78
Cilic 77
Raonic 76
Monfils 75
Murray 74
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TennisChannel?src=hash
Dominik snagatorSimilis simili gaudet
Comment
-
Originally posted by Maxx-a View PostAverage forehand speeds 2016
Thiem 81 mph
Djokovic 78
Nishikori 78
Wawrinka 78
Cilic 77
Raonic 76
Monfils 75
Murray 74
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TennisChannel?src=hash
Dominik snagator
Moram priznati da sam iznenađen podatkom za Novaka, i to vrlo pozitivno.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Maxx-a View PostAverage forehand speeds 2016
Thiem 81 mph
Djokovic 78
Nishikori 78
Wawrinka 78
Cilic 77
Raonic 76
Monfils 75
Murray 74
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TennisChannel?src=hash
Dominik snagatorLako je uvek pogadjati u centar ako imaš ljude da crtaju krugove oko njega
Comment
-
Sumnjam da su se Raonic i Endi nesto dogovarali. Po meni je mnogo verovatnije da su se Federer i Del Potro dogovorili na zavrsnom turniru 2009. godine i izbacili Endija. Ne znam da li se secate, ali je bio neki neverovatan rezultat gde je Endi ispao za jedan gem i to je bila bas mala sansa da se desi a ipak je bio takav rezultat izmedju Federera i Del Potra. Koliko se secam Federer je bio onda prvi u grupi a Del Potro drugi. Onda je Federer prvi put igubio od Davidenka a Del Potro valjda pobedio Soderlinga, da bi u finalu na kraju Davidenko osvojio ceo turnir
Edit : Del Potro je dobio 6–2, 6–7(5–7), 6–3. Njemu je bilo potrebno da ima ubedljivu gem razliku ( ako dobije 2:1) a Federeru je manje vise bilo dovoljno da dobije set ( jer je imao strasnu gem razliku)Last edited by 147; 15-11-16, 19:54.
Comment
-
Dosta je ispisano a da Role nije spomenut, napredujemo kao forum
Sent from my Z3 compact <3http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
To Stoji Bojana. Raonic i Marej se gotovo sigurno nisu dogovorili. E sada drugo je pitanje da li bi Raonic igrao protiv nekog slabijeg. Mozda bi.
A za Federa sam onako spomenuo. Slazem se da verovatno nije ni vreme ni mesto
Inace meni je skroz ok da neko navija za Rodzera iz Srbije. Pa ja sam bio njegov navijac od 2006 do 2008. Krenuo sam da navijam za Djokovica zato sto je Srbin. DA nije tako verovatno bi i dan danas navijao za Federera.
Po meni je gore ovo sto sam ja uradio nego da neko iz Srbije navija za Rogera. Doduse i moj potez je skorz logican
Comment
-
Pa posto si sad takav fan Djokovica, a za Feda si navijao od 2006.-2008., ti realno nikad nisi ni bio Roletov fan
Sent from my Z3 compact <3http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Maxx-a View PostAverage forehand speeds 2016
Thiem 81 mph
Djokovic 78
Nishikori 78
Wawrinka 78
Cilic 77
Raonic 76
Monfils 75
Murray 74
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TennisChannel?src=hash
Dominik snagator
Možda zato što on ubacuje dosta spina, a ostali udaraju ravnije?Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.AliKo sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred."When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostKoliko ja znam, ATPov doktor mora da potvrdi povredu, sto znaci da je nekoliko doktora pogresno reklo Raonicu u cemu je problem, jer Raonic je samo teniser, on moze samo da ponovi ono sto su mu rekli doktori.
A ako cemo o teoriji zavere, Djokovic, njegovo ponasanje i rezultati su mnogo sumnjiviji od Raoniceve predaje.
Comment
Comment