Novak se posteno iscijedio juce, a predstoji mu put: Faderer - Cicipas - Demonic Thiem. Ovo je horor.. Stvarno ovaj turnir treba da ima tezinu slema.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nitto ATP Finals London 2019.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostMa kakav h2h u trouglu, to je nemoguce, ako je takvo pravilo nista gluplje odavno nisam cuo.
U svakom slucaju Novaku sada odgovara.
Comment
-
Ako je istina ovo sto Mare kaze da Nadal igra prvi mec onda tu nema posla,zavrsio je on svoje.
I da dobije Cicibana Medjed ne bi to vece imao motiv da pobijedi,jedino to sto bi mu znacilo tih 200 bodova da bude medju 4 nosioca na AO sto je znacajna stvar,jer bez tih 200 bodova bi ovdje Thiem mogao ozbiljno da ga ugrozi.Mada ako udje u finale Timi svakako ga stize ali bi ostala manja razlika koja bi bila dostizna na turnirima pred AO.
U svakom slucaju Djokovicu bi trebala titula ovdje za prvo mjesto ako Rafa dobije Cicibana,ako ne dovoljno mu je finale.
Ipak ne, ja sve zaboravljam da je Novak izgubio svoj mec,samo mu titula igra vec sad.Last edited by E1_PG; 13-11-19, 22:23.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ivan_PG View PostAko je istina ovo sto Mare kaze da Nadal igra prvi mec onda tu nema posla,zavrsio je on svoje.
I da dobije Cicibana Medjed ne bi to vece imao motiv da pobijedi,jedino to sto bi mu znacilo tih 200 bodova da bude medju 4 nosioca na AO sto je znacajna stvar,jer bez tih 200 bodova bi ovdje Thiem mogao ozbiljno da ga ugrozi.Mada ako udje u finale Timi svakako ga stize ali bi ostala manja razlika koja bi bila dostizna na turnirima pred AO.
U svakom slucaju Djokovicu bi trebala titula ovdje za prvo mjesto ako Rafa dobije Cicibana,ako ne dovoljno mu je finale.
Comment
-
Nadal sigurno igra prvi, jer ako stave mec Zverev-Medvedev kao prvi, moze da se desi da Cicipas-Nadal bude "mrtav" mec.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Ma Medjedov ce pobijediti Zvereva, on je danas zbog prsta izgubio, nesto nestvarno totalno, iako je pao u formi i dalje je jedini posle velike trojke koji moze da igra u kontinuitetu na najvecem nivou. Djokovicu je mnogo zajebaniji Federer od Nadala, njemu je Nadal idealan protivnik ovdje. Tri sata protiv Tima moze ostaviti posledice.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostAko ispadnu Novak i Nadal da li igraju za peto mjesto i pobjednik uzima 420 bodova?
Mozda nije Halep, mozda je Woz, ali znam da je bilo [emoji3]
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment