Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nitto ATP Finals London 2019.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Zverko (uz nivo protiv Rafe) Tsitsi (uz nivo danas) te Thiem (uz nivo igre kao juče) kad imajo svoj "najbolji" dan mogu i ume da dobiju veliku trojku i uz činjenicu da igrači velike trojke igrajo na svom maksimumu.

    Neče biti lako VELIKOJ TROJKI sljedeče godine na GS-ovima.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
      Ako Nadal pobedi Cicipasa, a Zverev izgubi (posto jedino tako Nadal moze da prodje), onda Medvedev i Zverev ispadaju jer imaju samo 1 pobedu, a Nadal prolazi dalje jer ima bolji h2h.
      Ako Zverev pobedi, Nadalu pobeda nista ne znaci.
      Ne moze biti prvi Nadal nikako, moze DA bude drugi samo.
      There's something wrong with me chemically
      Something wrong with me inherently
      The wrong mix in the wrong genes
      I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
      It was the wrong plan
      In the wrong hands
      With the wrong theory for the wrong man
      The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
      The wrong questions with the wrong replies

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Indigo View Post
        Pa to sam I rekao. Rafa I Tsitsi ne mogu imati isti set kolicnik. Kako da oducuje h2h kada Tsitsipas ima bolji set kolicnik. U ovom primeru sto je neko postavio pise da je igrac sa set kolicnikom 5-2 prvi.
        Ispravio sam sw posle,dakle kada dvojica samo imaju isti odnos pobeda i poraza bez treceg takvog onda H2h

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Indigo View Post
          Pa to sam I rekao. Rafa I Tsitsi ne mogu imati isti set kolicnik. Kako da oducuje h2h kada Tsitsipas ima bolji set kolicnik. U ovom primeru sto je neko postavio pise da je igrac sa set kolicnikom 5-2 prvi.
          Indigo, ako Zverev pobedi, u najgorem slucaju sa 2:1, Medvedev ispada skroz jer nema pobedu. I Nadal pobedi sa 2:0.
          Onda postoje 3 igraca sa 2:1 w/l, onda se gleda prvo set kolicnik.
          Tsitispas ide na 4:2, Nadal na 4:3, Zverev na 4:3.
          Tsitsipas dalje otpada jer ima najbolji odnos, ostaju Zverev i Nadal i dalje prolazi Zverev zbog h2h.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Kad su samo dvojica izjednačena (Nadal i Tsitsipas), prvo se gleda h2h.

            Comment


            • Дакле, зависи од оба меча, ко ће ићи даље!

              ако добије Зверев и Рафа, примењује се једно правило

              ако победи Рафа а Зверев изгуби примењује се друго правило

              ако победи Грк, нема правила, само табела он први Зверев други, а ту је и Меда у комбинацији..за друго место..
              Last edited by Žika; 13-11-19, 22:10.
              sigpic

              Comment


              • Da, a to moze da se desi samo ako Zverev izgubi, pa Zverev i Medvedev imaju 1 pobedu i automatski ispadaju, pobednik meca Cicipas-Nadal ide kao prvi u grupi.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                  Indigo, ako Zverev pobedi, u najgorem slucaju sa 2:1, Medvedev ispada skroz jer nema pobedu. I Nadal pobedi sa 2:0.
                  Onda postoje 3 igraca sa 2:1 w/l, onda se gleda prvo set kolicnik.
                  Tsitispas ide na 4:2, Nadal na 4:3, Zverev na 4:3.
                  Tsitsipas dalje otpada jer ima najbolji odnos, ostaju Zverev i Nadal i dalje prolazi Zverev zbog h2h.
                  Meni je to jasno, nisam ni pisao o tome. Samo mi objasni kako Rafa moze biti prvi? Posto ne moze.
                  There's something wrong with me chemically
                  Something wrong with me inherently
                  The wrong mix in the wrong genes
                  I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
                  It was the wrong plan
                  In the wrong hands
                  With the wrong theory for the wrong man
                  The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
                  The wrong questions with the wrong replies

                  Comment


                  • Izgleda Rafa igra prvi, znači nema ništa.
                    Originally posted by Casiraghi
                    Al bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
                    Originally posted by Casiraghi
                    Ti nikad neces biti kao Joel Matip.

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj_G6ExBTE
                    Originally posted by Casiraghi
                    Srecan Mane svima koji slave.

                    Comment


                    • OK, odustajem. Jebala ih pravila.
                      There's something wrong with me chemically
                      Something wrong with me inherently
                      The wrong mix in the wrong genes
                      I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
                      It was the wrong plan
                      In the wrong hands
                      With the wrong theory for the wrong man
                      The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
                      The wrong questions with the wrong replies

                      Comment


                      • Ukratko, Nadalu je nemoguća misija da ode u finale. Sve zavisi od Novaka što se tiče prvog mjesta.

                        Comment


                        • Ipak je Salo resio sa pobedom od 2:0 i danasnjim raspadom bravo Salo veliki si majstoree veliki,veci od prevare

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Indigo View Post
                            Meni je to jasno, nisam ni pisao o tome. Samo mi objasni kako Rafa moze biti prvi? Posto ne moze.
                            Pa kako ne moze, Zverev izgubi, on i Medvedev imaju 1/2 w/l, njih dvojica skroz ispadaju iz price.
                            Onda imas Cicipas-Nadal, ako Nadal pobedi, obojica imaju 2:1 w/l i gleda se h2h jer Medvedev i Zverev imaju samo po jednu pobedu.
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Ma kakav h2h u trouglu, to je nemoguce, ako je takvo pravilo nista gluplje odavno nisam cuo.
                              sigpic

                              Comment


                              • Hahahahah ni ja isto,Wtf je zajedno sa Salom prekucao igricu

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X