Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Australian open 2019.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Steta sto ce Rafa uzeti ovaj AO.
    Dayman (a-a-ah...)
    Fighter of the Nightman (a-a-ah...)
    Champion of the sun (a-a-ah...)
    You're a master of karate and friendship
    For everyone

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Dekson View Post
      Mogao je i da izvrši korekciju linijskog sudije(koji je ne samo pogrešio već i kasno uzviknuo aut) ako je video dobru loptu i tek onda dozvoli čelendž, ali sve se tako brzo izdešavalo da je i ovako ispravno postupio što je odma dao čelendž kao bi zaštitio obojicu igrača a pre svega Keia od loše procene linijskog sudije.
      ?? Pa sta ce da dozvoljava challenge ako je izvrsio koreckciju. Onda moze samo Keiju da dozvoli. I sta je zastitio ikoga time sto je dozvolio. Morao je ili da ne da challenge uz obrzlozenje late call ili da ponovi poen nakon sto je hawk-eye pokazao dobru loptu, ako je vec dozvolio. Ovako je dao challenge i nije ga uvazio

      Comment


      • IMG_20190121_211908.jpg

        Sve je objasnio.
        Originally posted by Casiraghi
        Al bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
        Originally posted by Casiraghi
        Ti nikad neces biti kao Joel Matip.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj_G6ExBTE
        Originally posted by Casiraghi
        Srecan Mane svima koji slave.

        Comment


        • Last edited by icetea; 21-01-19, 20:33.
          -To define is to limit.

          Comment


          • Dovoljna greska je i to Busta Challenging the call...Treba da izbaciti negde do Wimbledona. Za nauk ostalim sudijama.

            Takodje Lajani ocajno sudi ovaj turnir. Jeste harizmatican i hrabar sudija, ali po meni vise nije sam vrh. I njega treba stavljati vise na neke sporedne terene.
            Last edited by 147; 21-01-19, 20:35.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by icetea View Post
              Nema sta po automatizmu, ako je tu samo da govori rezultat, onda neka uvedu neke zvucne semafore, hawk eye na sve linije i da izbacimo glavnog sudiju.
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Nema sta po automatizmu, ako je tu samo da govori rezultat, onda neka uvedu neke zvucne semafore, hawk eye na sve linije i da izbacimo glavnog sudiju.
                Ne razumem.
                -To define is to limit.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by icetea View Post

                  Ma vidi se da je sudija po automatizmu krenuo sa "Busta challenging the call..." i stao jer zna da je pogresio i nije trebalo da mu dozvoli challenge.

                  Trebalo je samo da kaze da je late call (to tek na 1:10 kaze), kao sto je i bio (tako da odluka je ispravno doneta) i zdravo.
                  Ovo je potvrdio i jedan sudija iz BiH, zajebao se, a onaj zaduzen za hawkeye odmah pustio celendz, umesto da saceka.
                  Dayman (a-a-ah...)
                  Fighter of the Nightman (a-a-ah...)
                  Champion of the sun (a-a-ah...)
                  You're a master of karate and friendship
                  For everyone

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by icetea View Post
                    Ne razumem.
                    Pa ako govori po automatizmu, znaci ne ukljucuje mozak, sta ce onda tu?
                    samo da govori rezultat, to moze bilo ko ili neki automat
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Mr. Wolf View Post
                      Ovo je potvrdio i jedan sudija iz BiH, zajebao se, a onaj zaduzen za hawkeye odmah pustio celendz, umesto da saceka.
                      Pa da, njega treba izbaciti.

                      Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                      Pa ako govori po automatizmu, znaci ne ukljucuje mozak, sta ce onda tu?
                      samo da govori rezultat, to moze bilo ko ili neki automat
                      Kazem krenuo je i stao. Pogresio, desava se.
                      -To define is to limit.

                      Comment


                      • A sto se tice ferpleja ko je sta zasluzio ili ne, pa nije ni Kei neko olicenje istog. Kada se samo setim protiv Novaka kako se pravio blesav kada je sudija priznao lopticu koja je dva puta pala, a ima jos tih gluposti.
                        Tako da je to bzvz pominjati.
                        sigpic

                        Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
                        But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by NI View Post
                          Usporeni snimka koju je posla dr Wolf je za mene rijesila dilemu.
                          Dayman (a-a-ah...)
                          Fighter of the Nightman (a-a-ah...)
                          Champion of the sun (a-a-ah...)
                          You're a master of karate and friendship
                          For everyone

                          Comment


                          • Nisam upratio...na 6:6 ide TB ali do 10 se igra?
                            Znsci 3 poena su produzili...e sile jesu produzili...
                            I ja sam za ukidanje dugih meceva ali mogo se TB ubacit na 8:8 ili 10:10...

                            Sent from my LG-M250 using Tapatalk
                            - 19 Grand Slams titles (84 titles)
                            - Most titles won on a single GS, Masters and ATP 500 (12 RG, 11 MC, 11 Barcelona)
                            - Winning 1 slam for 10 years in row (2005-2014)
                            - Clay slam (2010), Summer slam (2013), 2x Channel slams (2008,2010)
                            - Slams on 3 different surfaces in single year (2010), 2 slams on each surface
                            - The highest winning ratio on single surface (clay - 92%)
                            - Positive Grand Slam H2H with all big rivals
                            - Single and double gold medal winner (2008, 2016)

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by jacques9 View Post
                              A meni je želja, da neko namuči NOvaka do finala.

                              A budi siguran, da to se neče desiti.

                              NOvak je več u finalu.

                              Raonič kad igra svoj najbolji tenis može svakoga da pobedi, ali po pravilu kad igra protiv NOvaka on se ukenja i NOvak uvijek pješke dobiva.
                              Jesi ti gledao njihov zadnji mec u Sangaju? Raona je puno radio na sebi.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Joker View Post
                                Jesi ti gledao njihov zadnji mec u Sangaju? Raona je puno radio na sebi.
                                U teoriji (kad je u dobroj formi) Raonič je nepobediv na brzoj podlozi

                                Ako servira dobro a to ume da radi po cijeli meč, nemoguče mu je uzeti servis. Znači najmanje do tie breaka može da doguru, a u tie-brokovima ima najbolji % pobeda od svih igrača na ATP touru.

                                Tu i tamo desi se, da NOvak (pa i Rafa) imaju koji loš servis game, znači Raonič je stanju da napravi po koji break i protiv njih

                                Ali to je samo teorija i važi za mečevi kad Raonič ne igra protiv velike četvorke



                                Svi znamo kakva je Raoniču mentalna snaga kad se suprostavi Novaku. TOTALNI RAZPAD SISTEMA


                                Pa i Shangaju je Raonič izgubio od Novaka, tako da priča je uvijek ista.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X