Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nitto ATP Finals London 2018.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by 147 View Post
    Pa da. U tom slucaju je Anderson prvi jer ima najbolji set kolocnik, a Nisikori drugi jer je pobedio Federera u medjusobnom duelu.
    Pa zar se u krugu onda dalje ne gleda gem kolicnik, a ne da se vraca na medjusobni duel?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
      Pa zar se u krugu onda dalje ne gleda gem kolicnik, a ne da se vraca na medjusobni duel?
      Sudeci po toj tabeli moj prethodni odgovor je jedino objasnjenje. Ajde potrazicu pravilnik na sajtu ATPa. Secam se da sam bas to gledao pre par godina, ali sam zaboravio sta sam procitao

      Comment


      • A i ovo mi smiješno što ih vucaju zajedno, ko mečke ih pokazuju. A ljubav između ljutih rivala cvjeta

        Comment


        • Originally posted by 147 View Post
          Sudeci po toj tabeli moj prethodni odgovor je jedino objasnjenje. Ajde potrazicu pravilnik na sajtu ATPa. Secam se da sam bas to gledao pre par godina, ali sam zaboravio sta sam procitao
          Ne moras, nasla sam ,vraca se na medjusobni duel
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Da, evo nasao sam. Tabela je tacna:

            Comment 4: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, 1 player’s sets won-loss is 5-2 for 71.43%; the other 2 players both have a 4-3 record in sets for 57.14%. In this case there is 1 superior player (71.43%) and the remaining 2 players are tied; it now reverts to the head to head result of the 2 remaining players with the winning player advancing as group runner-up.

            Slobodno obrisi ovaj komentar, bila si malo brza, pa nisam video tvoj komentar...

            Comment


            • Rece Visko da je apliciralo oko 40 gradova za zavrsni od 2021. Sredinom decembra ATP bira 4-5 kandidata, a u martu sledece godine znace se da li ostaje u Londonu ili se seli i gde.
              sigpic

              Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
              But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

              Comment


              • Ma nema veze, neka stoji, mozda ce zatrebati za drugu grupu

                Roger mora da dobije sa 2:0 i da ne razmislja o Timu i Nishikoriju
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Roger igra u 21h u cetvrtak (Beneto umire kuci ), tako da ce znati na cemu je
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by miloolja View Post
                    Rece Visko da je apliciralo oko 40 gradova za zavrsni od 2021. Sredinom decembra ATP bira 4-5 kandidata, a u martu sledece godine znace se da li ostaje u Londonu ili se seli i gde.
                    Sad poceo da pisem ali vidim ti poslala...pa samo da dodam, svaka cast Visku i ekipi SK odlicni prilozi iz Londona. Uzivanje je gledati W na SK.
                    Svaka cast.

                    Послато са SM-N9005 уз помоћ Тапатока

                    Comment


                    • Nego nesto se razmisljam. Deluje mi da Rodzer nema sansi ako Nisikori dobije 2:0. Posle Anderson treba da odigra par gemova i da preda Rodzeru. Pravi se krug. Anderson ima najbolji set kolicnik, a Rodzer najgori i ide kuci...

                      Comment


                      • Anderson ako preda, onda on ide kuci, ne moze da preda a da nastavi turnir
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                          Anderson ako preda, onda on ide kuci, ne moze da preda a da nastavi turnir
                          To deluje logicno. Nego, sta ako Tim preda Nisikoriju na 1:0 u gemovima u prvom setu? Kako bi se racunala ta pobeda za Nisikorija? Da li kao 6:0 6:0?

                          Comment


                          • najpametniji moguci odgovor

                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by 147 View Post
                              To deluje logicno. Nego, sta ako Tim preda Nisikoriju na 1:0 u gemovima u prvom setu? Kako bi se racunala ta pobeda za Nisikorija? Da li kao 6:0 6:0?
                              Sigurno ne, onda bi se Keiju racunao samo taj jedan set, ja makar mislim
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                                Sigurno ne, onda bi se Keiju racunao samo taj jedan set, ja makar mislim
                                Obrni, okreni, kako god da se to gleda nije fer. Zato po meni treba promeniti pravilo, odnosno da se gleda set odnosno gem kolicnik samo u krugu...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X