A volim ja tebe, Oljice, boze sacuvaj da bih te stavio na ignore, sve i da mogu.. samo sto ne mogu bas vazda da odgovaram na tvoja "ja niista ne razumeeem"
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nitto ATP Finals London 2018.
Collapse
X
-
Pa srpski ti pricam....preskoci, da sacuvas zdravlje, ti proizvoljni zakljucci na ovom forumu kako se kome cefne ,iskreno na glavu su mi se popeli...jer imate misljenjasigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.
Comment
-
Gledao sam malopre Viska iz Londona i na pitanje da li je podloga u Londonu brza ili spora kao sto kaze Federer Novak je odgovorio da je "nezgodna". Znci pored brze i spore podloge sada imamo i "nezgodne" podloge tako da je Bojana u pravu.
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostMeni je podloga cudna, juce sam to pripisivala to sto je Federer nesposoban, ali i sad gledam i ne mogu da je definisem uopste
Comment
-
Mi, veliki majstori, slicno razmisljamo
Sad ozbiljno, juce je Djokovic stalno nekako plasirao lopticu, dosta spina davao, retko kad je jako i snazno udarao, kao da je nije lako iskontrolisati lopticu mozda si u loptice u pitanju, nemam pojma, ali jeste sve nekako cudnohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Nek je neko spomenuo ono bezobrazno forsiranje Federera u Australiji , moralo je nesto biti iza toga kao sto je Beneto spomenou neku poslovnu vezu. A sad Djokovicu su vezane ruke sto se tice odgovara, morao je diplomatski ali je naglasio da razumije Benetov point of view i to je nesto
Comment
-
Je l su i Izneru vezane ruke?
Beneto dobijao Satrije i CC u Bersiju samo zato sto je rodjen u Francuskoj, osvojio lik ukupno 0 titula u singlu i nasao nesto da pametuje ali shvatam ga, da je pricao o svojoj karijeri ne bi dobio ovoliko medijskog prostora, ovako dobio svojih 5 minuta slave, valjda je sad srecanhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Pa Izner nije uopste izravno pogodjen ovom pricom, ni ti bi igrao te vecernje termine koji su bili rezervisani za Federera, on ima pravo na misljenje a covjek koji je izravno pogodjen Federerovim specijalnim tretmanom u najvecem broju slucajeva bio je upravo Djokovic. I vidjelo se u odgovoru da bi rekao svasta ali nece jer razumije situaciju gdje novac i popularnost igraju najvecu najvecu ulogu ali da se moralo imati granice za to a nije. Ali opet mi je drago da se to spomenulo jer gdje ima dima ima i vatre
Comment
-
Pusti Benetoa, sta si se okomila na njega. Bas zamrzis bilo koga ko kaze bilo sta iole lose o Rodzeru.
Jbt ....
SpoilerRodzer je gaysigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sandugp View PostPusti Benetoa, sta si se okomila na njega. Bas zamrzis bilo koga ko kaze bilo sta iole lose o Rodzeru.
Jbt ....
SpoilerRodzer je gay
licemerno je slaba rec za to...
@Dino
Djokovic je jasno rekao
you have to understand that also Federer is a driving force of tennis in terms of revenue, in terms of attention, in terms of all these different things. ‘Julien and guys like him are also benefitting from tennis, because of Roger, because of what he has done for the sport.’
So I don’t think there’s a favouritism system like that at all. I think those guys are the ones that by and large carry our sport in a big way and they deserve everything they’ve ever earned. So that is how you can look at a guy like Roger. He is men’s tennis in my opinion. So, he deserves everything and more that he’s ever had.’http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Tek sad vidim sta je Isner rekao i klasicno preseravanje, govorenje u radikalnom obliku onoga sto zele mnogi da cuju. Federer je tenis, zasluzuje vise nego sto je dobio , pa komentatori i mediji su proglasili Federera za GOAT-A kad je imao 6 GS i tako ga i oslovljavali.
Pa to sto je Djokovic rekao ne mora da znaci da je on na osnovu toga mislio da je Federer morao igrati svaki vecernji termin i svaki put biti na CC svakog turnira ikad zbog te cinjenice i da podrzava tako nesto.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DinoFC View PostTek sad vidim sta je Isner rekao i klasicno preseravanje, govorenje u radikalnom obliku onoga sto zele mnogi da cuju. Federer je tenis, zasluzuje vise nego sto je dobio , pa komentatori i mediji su proglasili Federera za GOAT-A kad je imao 6 GS i tako ga i oslovljavali.
Pa to sto je Djokovic rekao ne mora da znaci da je on na osnovu toga mislio da je Federer morao igrati svaki vecernji termin i svaki put biti na CC svakog turnira ikad zbog te cinjenice i da podrzava tako nesto.
Ali dzaba ja to pisem, najverovatnije Djokovic ne misli ni ovo, samo je to tako rekao:
‘If he doesn’t have it, who is going to have it? People want to see him play on the center court, and they want to see him play in showtime, the best hours, which is 7:30 at night in Rod Laver Arena.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment