Originally posted by miloolja
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pariz 2018.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Joker View PostDobro, onda cu i ja od sad da pocinjem postove sa: "Vidi se koliko ne znas..", time cemo unaprijediti kvalitet rasprave.
I da Bojana ne govori clanovima da nemaju pojma, zaboravih to -.-sigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.
Comment
-
Pa kad ne zna, kako da mu kazem, sam je rekao da je otisao na atp sajt da pogleda h2hhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by miloolja View PostJel to ona dupla ram-zica loptahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Meč je bio dobar i kvalitetan mada po meni ne meni bez te neke note epskog.
Zbog Novakove realizacije od 0% na brejk prilike imali smo viđeni tok meča. Nije sporno da je Rodžer imao odličan serverski dan međutim Novak je morao i mogao biti bolji u tom segmentu. Na stranu što je i sreća okrenula leđa u dve prilike ali ona nije bila presudna u situacijama gde se samo on pitao kao recimo kod one fh paralele koja završi u debelom autu. Bar 3,4 puta bio je na loptici uprkos dobrim Rodžerovim servisima, imao lepe šanse za dobar ritern ali ih je redom proćerdao. Da je u tim situacijama imao koncentraciju poput one u dva tb-a meč bi bio rešen ranije.
Sumnjam da Rodžer može bolje od prikazanog dok Novak sigurno može.sigpic
Comment
-
Roger moze bolje od ovog, pre svega kod riterna, koji je poslednja kockica koja se uklopi u njegovoj igri kad se vraca u formuhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostVidis, ja mislim da je na onoj BL kad se iznervirao imao sansi. On je Federerove 1. servise u T te dubine vracao citavo vrijeme meca. Zato se i iznervirao.
Dvije greske koje su uslijedile sam pripisao Novakovom nedostatku zelje za pobjedom. Ako se nesto moze zamjeriti Novaku, to je da pritisak na Federera nije bio konstantan. Poslije propustenih prilika bi pritisak padao. Najgori pad je bio u 12. gemu 2. seta. Tada je dzabe dao svoj servi. Inace, to nije vazilo u TB-ovima. U TB-ima su Novakov intenzitet i fokus bili besprekorni. TB cesto odluci sreca. U prvom TB je ona bila na Federerovoj strani, ali to nije dekuraziralo Novaka, njegov fokus je presudio. U drugom je sreca bila na Novakovoj strani i sve je islo lako.
Federer je cijelo vrijeme igrao na maksimumu. (red lining) I to uspjesno. 54 vinera 52 neiznudjene. Kad igras tako ima grubih promasaja. A Novak nije igra na maksim. Gotovo je igra bez BH paralele. Nije bio siguran u nju. Rodzer je dobio vise poena BH parelelom nego Novak. Rodzer je imao efikasnost 63.6%. Tj. 63.6% poena koje je on odluci je odlucio u svoju korist. (To je za Federera nisko. On obicno ima 70%. To je znak da je igrao na maksimumu) A Novak je imao 71.4%.
E tu si bas omanuo, moram da ti kazem, nijednim potezom to nije pokazivao, naprotiv, a to sto mubje fokus koji je maltene bio na najvisem novou, dovoljno govori, zapravo fokus obojice.
Ja sam i rekla da se iznervirao zbog loseg riterna i zato polupao reket.
A greske nakon tog izjednacenja, kao i nekoliko puta pre toga meni su govorili samo jedno...da se iznervirao zbog propustenih sansi, kao sto je bila i ta na 40:40 i dozvolio da mu fokus ipak malo padne, da bi se odmah u svom servis gemu vratio.sigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostPa kad ne zna, kako da mu kazem, sam je rekao da je otisao na atp sajt da pogleda h2h
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joker View PostPa ja nisam folirant, od mene ces iskren odgovor uvijek dobiti. Znao sam da su igrali USO jos kad Fedja nije imao ni slema, ali sam za zadnje njihove okrsaje mislio da su ipak bili par godina ranije. To sve nije razlog da se omalovazavamo sujetnim: "Nemas pojma.. nista ne znas.." i sta ti ja znam. To vise prilici sitnim dusama, ne pravim navijacima. No.. tvoja volja, gospodare.. čini što ti volja...
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joker View Post"Samouvjereno" sam rekao da je Federer bio young gun tada i Bokica se razjarila.. dabogda....
Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment