Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shanghai 2017.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Ne mozes da poredis Gofana i Kirijosa, Gofan osvojio 2 titule u poslednje 2 nedelje i nije imao vise snage, ovaj rekao svom boksu: ako izgubim TB, predacu, a pre toga se svadjao sa sudijom
    plus, zna se kakav je Gofan, a kakav je Kirijos
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • #92
      Aj sad, znas da nisi u pravo... Sta je pokusavao prosle godine i kako je pokusavao? S tim sto je rekao sudiju da brze zovne TIME za da brze ide kuci? Sto je spavao u pauzi izmedju gemova? Nemoj molim te, nista ne pere Kirgiosa od svoje seljacko ponasanje.
      OVAKO

      Comment


      • #93
        Pa igrao je i Nik finale, on kao nije umoran bio?

        Ok, Goffin nije to rekao boksu, al suština je ista, pogledajte prvi gem u drugom setu pažljivo i sve će vam se samo kazati kakav je stav po pitanju drugog seta imao

        Comment


        • #94
          Nik je igrao finale, Gofan je igrao 2 nedelje i osvojio 2 turnira, definitivno nije isto.

          I Shapovalov je bio bolestan, pa je stajao u 3.setu protiv Troickog i pukao 6:0, cak su mu savetovali da ne igra, ali on je hteo jer je dobio WC.
          A ovaj majstor, onako grbav, resi da nije vredno da se cima i samo pruzi ruku i ode
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • #95
            Pa stajao je na terenu i Nik prošle godine protiv Zvereva, pa je popljuvan

            što bi u pričaonici rekli, dvostruki aršini

            heroj Šapo, stajao na terenu

            Comment


            • #96
              Realno, Kiriosa treba kazniti jako jednom, da se malo zapita, bas se nezrelo i bezobrazno ponasa, i mnogo mu se dopusta.

              Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
              Nik je igrao finale, Gofan je igrao 2 nedelje i osvojio 2 turnira, definitivno nije isto.

              I Shapovalov je bio bolestan, pa je stajao u 3.setu protiv Troickog i pukao 6:0, cak su mu savetovali da ne igra, ali on je hteo jer je dobio WC.
              A ovaj majstor, onako grbav, resi da nije vredno da se cima i samo pruzi ruku i ode
              Iskreno, po mom misljenju, ovo je tri puta gore, pisao sam pre to vec, ako vec ne mozes postenije je da predas, nista ti nisi ispostovao publiku i jos vise gledaoce pored ekrana ako si izgubio 6:0 i stajao na terenu, to je bas debilno, uvek se iznerviram kada gledam takav mec.
              sloboda ili ništa

              Comment


              • #97
                Pa i sam znas sta je Kirgios radio prosle godine, da je samo stajao ne bi ga niko krivio nesto posebno, ovako znamo svi sta je uradio i kako je to uradio. On je rekao sudiji da brze zovne TIME, spavao u pauze izmedju gemova i jos milion drugih stvari. To je nepostovanje prvo prema tenisu kao sport a onda i prema svima drugima. Ma ne kontam kako moze neko da opravdava Kirgiosa, decko koji zivi u svet gde misli da su se svi urotili protiv njega a on je bitan kao i lanski sneg.
                OVAKO

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by shminka View Post
                  Pa stajao je na terenu i Nik prošle godine protiv Zvereva, pa je popljuvan

                  što bi u pričaonici rekli, dvostruki aršini

                  heroj Šapo, stajao na terenu
                  Ono sto je on radio prosle godine protiv Zvereva je najveca moguca sramota, servira ispod ruke i samo krene ka stolici
                  Shapo se trudio, trcao koliko je mogao plus je klinac koji je dobio WC i nije hteo to da propusti.
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Svaka čast Šapi na trudu u trećem, dao sve od sebe, al nije mu se dalo da uzme gem

                    Comment


                    • Najveći gubitnik bila u pitanju predaja, povreda ili nespremnost je publika. Ljudi pošteno plate da gledaju tenis a zauzvrat dobiju šipak.
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by shminka View Post
                        Svaka čast Šapi na trudu u trećem, dao sve od sebe, al nije mu se dalo da uzme gem
                        Pa vise je uradio nego Kirijos prosle godine, uzeo je set i ponasao se samo 100 puta normalnije
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Ja ne vidim nista herojsko u tome kada se igraci vuku po terenu, ocigledno povredjeni i samo zamaraju narod da gleda njihovo prenemaganje koje se na kraju zavrsi nekim rezultatom tipa 6:1 6:0. Ko moze to da gleda? Zar nije postenije, ako vec ne mozes da das svoj maksimum, da predas nego da se foliras kao tu igras nesto a vec si predao, samo eto nisi jos pruzio ruku i krenuo ka svlacionici?
                          sloboda ili ništa

                          Comment


                          • Herojski je kad Šapo šeta, a kad Nik šeta, onda je za zatvora

                            Comment


                            • Uporedi Denisovo ponasanje od ove godine i Kirijosovo od prosle, ako je isto, onda ok.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Pa evo hipotetički, da je Nik ostao na terenu i da je izgubio 6-0 drugi set, da li bi bio popljuvan opet?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X