Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATP - Roger Federer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts



  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Wizard

      Comment


      • Deda je sigurni ucesnik polufinala. Ako mu se otvori zreb, bice to sa pola snage u polufinalu. Ako ne bude nikakvih pomeranja usled vremenskih prilika, sa danom odmora i bez postenog protivnika bice ovo uspesan turnir za njega.

        Comment


        • U 4.kolu najverovatnije Svarcman, u qf Stan/Cicipas, da Djokovic ima ovakav zreb, ti bi prvi kukao na sve strane, ali Roger je vec u polufinalu
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
            U 4.kolu najverovatnije Svarcman, u qf Stan/Cicipas, da Djokovic ima ovakav zreb, ti bi prvi kukao na sve strane, ali Roger je vec u polufinalu
            Novak ima podjednako težak žreb. Zvereva van forme kao i Stana i Ćorića u 4.kolu. Da imalo pratis forme i igru umesto modne revije znala bi. Ovako čekaćemo tvoj komentar kad izađe nova patika ili šorc.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Ljubitelj tenisa View Post
              Novak ima podjednako težak žreb. Zvereva van forme kao i Stana i Ćorića u 4.kolu. Da imalo pratis forme i igru umesto modne revije znala bi. Ovako čekaćemo tvoj komentar kad izađe nova patika ili šorc.
              Da ti imas blage veze o tenisu, ne bi pisao ovakve gluposti
              Cicipas ili Zverev, ma da, mnogo je tezi zreb Zverev van formi nego Cicipas koji je pobedio Nadala na sljaci i Rogera na AOu
              u 4.kolu najverovatnije Svarcman koji je namucio Djokovica u Rimu, ali ne sigurno je tezi Coric koji apsolutno nije u formi...

              a to sta cu ja ovde da pisem, to je moj problem, nemoj da ulazis na temu
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Ja sam odmah kad sam vidio zrijeb rekao da je Federer u polufinalu. Ne zbog imena koliko zbog cinjenice da ce mu protivnici dolaziti umorni na megdan. Time mislim prvenstveno na emotivna praznjenja u neizvjesnim mecevima, ne bas na fizicku iscrpljenost.. Ali tako mu se poslozilo. Ja prosto ne mogu da zamislim mec Cicija i Stana da bude 3:0 glat za nekog, tu mora biti krvi. Ma vidjecemo sve ubrzo..

                Comment


                • ma ljubitelj je u pravu,a bojana je trebala to da shvati kao kompliment fedu,sto u sustini i jeste
                  Wizard

                  Comment


                  • jos se ja cudim zasto je nema na tribinama, ni na jednom mecu da je prikazu

                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Samo da pohvalim Fedju da ima ubjedljivo najljepsi outfit na RG. Meni je ono prelijepo. Novakove one Lakosta strafte preko grudi su mi taaako.. seljacke. Bas jeftino izgledaju, kao od kineza..

                      Comment


                      • Pitanje za sve Federerove navijace:
                        U cijoj polovini bi vise voleli Federera na W?
                        Djokovicevoj ili Nadalovoj?
                        sigpic

                        Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                        U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                        Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Sandugp View Post
                          Pitanje za sve Federerove navijace:
                          U cijoj polovini bi vise voleli Federera na W?
                          Djokovicevoj ili Nadalovoj?
                          Nisam Federerovac, ali to niko u ovom trenutku ne moze znati. U prvom redu ne mozemo znati jer je neizvjesno kako ce Novak podnijeti danasnji poraz. U proslosti je dva slicna poraza podnio katastrofalno. (Rg 2012. i 2013.) Dok je tri dobro prebrodio. (RG 2011, 2014. i 2015.)

                          Comment


                          • Svejedno. Mozda vise Djokovicevoj jer je on u finalima napaljeniji, Fed je Nadala u poslednjih nekoliko finala izdominirao
                            Last edited by s_hyperion; 08-06-19, 19:09.

                            Comment


                            • Novakovoj, zna da se stegne Rodzer u finalu, a verujem da bi stegnut pre izasao sa Nadalom na kraj, nego sa Novakom.
                              I sto kaze zdravkelja - sa Rafom je pokazao da ume u finalima
                              Last edited by Mr. Wolf; 09-06-19, 15:30.
                              Dayman (a-a-ah...)
                              Fighter of the Nightman (a-a-ah...)
                              Champion of the sun (a-a-ah...)
                              You're a master of karate and friendship
                              For everyone

                              Comment


                              • Ako Fed osvoji Hale, nece postojati Nadalova polovina
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X