Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATP vs WTA - podjele nagrada, ravnopravnost, sovinizam i seksizam

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Joker View Post
    Daleko od toga da se to odnosi na sve profesije, vec samo na one u kojima su muskarci objektivno bolji. Ne vidim nista sporno u tome.
    Po cemu je to Djokovic bolji od Serene?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • #47
      U tome sto mu ne bi gem uzela?

      Comment


      • #48
        O boze
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • #49
          Kapitalisticko drustvo i pociva na zaradi, i jedino je novac bitan, koliko neko zaradjuje. Bas taj zapad toliko i mrzi komunizam, gde je sve izjednaceno i gde se ne gleda zarada vec pravicnost i radnicka jednakost. Gde se ne gleda ko je koliko uspesan, vec se sve deli jednako. Tenisere vise gledaju na stadionima, veca je posecenost, i samim tim vise prodaju karata, mnogo je popularnije, vise ljudi gleda preko TV prenose. Iz nekog razloga WTA je napravila komunisticki model, gde uzimaju novac od jednih i daju ih drugima . I sada odjednom je to dobro, a u svim ostalim aspektima se postuje kapitalizam i mrzi se komunizam.Kakvo licemerje, jezivo .

          Comment


          • #50
            po meni treba da je veci prizepool samo na slemovima zato sto m igraju u 3 seta i realno je da dobiju vise love jer je teze osvojiti, za sve ostale turnire je egal..

            Comment


            • #51
              Cinjenica je jedna: zenski tenis nikad nece biti kvalitetan i atraktivan koliko muski. Pametnom dovoljno..

              Comment


              • #52
                Sustina je veoma prosta. Zene i muskarci ne praktikuju isti sport (sad pricamo o tenisu). Nemaju tu snagu, brzinu i tehniku koje muskarci poseduju i to jednostavno zbog fiziolosko-anatomskih razloga. Plus igraju bo3 na slemovima, znaci napor je srazmeran njihovim mogucnostima. Kao sto zena nikad ne moze da bude vojnik na nivou jednog muskarca, niti baviti se ostalim poslovima muskog roda koji zahevaju takvu neku predispoziciju.
                Da li moze zena intelektualno da parira muskarcu? Apsolutno da. Moze biti superiornija po pitanju znanja, vestine, shvatanja? Apsolutno da.
                Sve ostalo je puko mlacenje prazne slame.
                --ZA GOSPODINA GOVEDARICU OD NJEGOVOG VERNOG SK FAN KLEBA--

                https://ibb.co/cD1Xnq

                Comment


                • #53
                  Glupo poređenje skroz. U svakom sportu ako se ne varam žene i muškarci igraju istu količinu minutu, setova, četvrtina osim u tenisu? Nema logike. Bore se za novac a ne kapiraju da to nema veze sa muškim tenisom već direktno sa sponzorima. Ljudi će radije gledati Djokovica, Nadala, Federera nego Serenu, Sabinu i kompaniju. Činjenica. A sponzori će naravno više da uloze onda u muškarce.

                  Jednakost. Apsolutno nikakav problem. Žene izvolite na građevinu muškarci u kuhinju. Najbanalnije moguće.

                  I što se tiče mogućnosti žena u tenisu. Evo ja sam lično ubeđen da bi Serena lagano dobila pola top10 muškaraca. Neka se vrati Enan ako ne grešim iz penzije ista priča.
                  Serena je klasa ništa sporno tu nije. Ali ako se traži ista zarada neka za početak igraju 3ci set na slemovima. Ili primer u 3 meča 12 sati da budu na terenu na AO kao što se dešava muškim teniserima.
                  Last edited by l1m4r; 21-03-16, 11:09.
                  Originally posted by Vladan
                  SAFa niko nije mogao ni jednom da prezivi, Runi je to uradio dva puta. Masivan. Monumentalan. Bivsi. Pozdrav legendo, donesi Evertonu nemoguci san.
                  :vinjaksmajli:

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Ugasiti Wta tour i sve pare preusmjeriti na Atp, a teniserke poslati u kuhinju, krevet i porodilista, tu im je i mjesto
                    sigpic
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMJ0-1GGf5k

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Serena ne bi dobila ni top 100 igraca, ali to nema veze sa ovom pricom.
                      Ali po ovojh prici ispada da Dudi Sela zasluzuje vise para, a da li on privuce vise gledaoca od neke Govortsove (uzela sam im ranking, koji je isti)? ja sumnjam, tj. podjendako ih ljudi ne gledaju
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Relativizovanjem do besmisla..

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                          Serena ne bi dobila ni top 100 igraca, ali to nema veze sa ovom pricom.
                          Ali po ovojh prici ispada da Dudi Sela zasluzuje vise para, a da li on privuce vise gledaoca od neke Govortsove (uzela sam im ranking, koji je isti)? ja sumnjam, tj. podjendako ih ljudi ne gledaju
                          Po tvome Federer ne zaslužuje više para od Kerber?

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                            Kao prvo, ako cemo po popularnosti da dajemo pare, onda i Noki nekim svojim kolegama treba da da deo para
                            A drugo, ne daje on pare, nego sponzori, i ako su oni nasli neku racunicu, ne znam sta se on tu mesa
                            Pa nece biti, Federerova dominacija bila mnogo dosadnija, brojke ne lazu. Ovo je zlatno doba ATPa

                            http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/J...BBB2626EA.ashx
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by darkman.021 View Post
                              Po tvome Federer ne zaslužuje više para od Kerber?
                              Ne, zasluzuju podjednako para, a Fed ionako ima ludacke sponzorske ugovore, tako da se ja ne brinem za njega.

                              @Vladan
                              znas ti dobro sta sam ja mislila, Buleverac je to lepo objasnio, a ti kopiraj postove sa MTFa i dalje
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Izglupirao se Novak za sve pare, umesto da da kratak odgovor uvukao se u celu pricu bez ikakve potrebe. Tu ide krajnje polite izjava, kako muskarce i zene treba tretirati na podjednak nacin, da treba zajedno da se bore za bolje uslove i vece nagrade jer zajedno su jaci bla bla truc truc

                                Umesto toga on se upleo kao pile u kucine
                                Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X