Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATP vs WTA - podjele nagrada, ravnopravnost, sovinizam i seksizam

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Moguće da ima nešto u ovome...

    tt.jpg

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Nikolabg View Post
      Moguće da ima nešto u ovome...

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]14402[/ATTACH]
      Naravno da ima. Prihodi su ne malim dijelom proporcionalni konkurenciji u samom vrhu.

      Comment


      • I još nešto o ravnopravnosti. Ako već žene žele iste novce kao i muškarci u tenisu, i ako je već neizvodljivo da igraju na tri dobijena seta(zbog organizacije i sl.što je Bojana pomenula), onda neka i muškarci GS igraju na dva dobijena, pa neka nagrade budu iste.
        Zapravo stvar je vrlo prosta, koliko radiš toliko treba i da zarađuješ, nema to veze sa polom.
        A najzanimljivija stvar koju niko još nije pomenuo...Kakve su plate sudija, trenera?
        Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.Ali
        Ko sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred.
        "When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Marija81 View Post
          I još nešto o ravnopravnosti. Ako već žene žele iste novce kao i muškarci u tenisu, i ako je već neizvodljivo da igraju na tri dobijena seta(zbog organizacije i sl.što je Bojana pomenula), onda neka i muškarci GS igraju na dva dobijena, pa neka nagrade budu iste.
          Zapravo stvar je vrlo prosta, koliko radiš toliko treba i da zarađuješ, nema to veze sa polom.
          A najzanimljivija stvar koju niko još nije pomenuo...Kakve su plate sudija, trenera?
          Zanimljiv clanak iz 2002., WTA je bio mnogo popularniji od ATPa, paljba po Rogeru (da je talenat koji nikako da se dokaze), paljba po Hjuitu i po jos nekim igracima, takodje i konstatacija da 32godisnji Agasi nece biti jos dugo tu da vuce ATP.
          Da li su tada zene vise zaradjivale od muskaraca?

          http://www.si.com/vault/2002/06/17/3...-by-themselves

          jeste blog, ali je pogodjena sustina

          https://adventuresofnicoleeclectic.w...uty-of-sports/
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Dobro, oca mu jeb, mogu li da dobijem objasnjenje zasto mi se brise post?

            Comment


            • Zato sto nisam htela da te banujem, post je prepun vredjanja
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Zato sto nisam htela da te banujem, post je prepun vredjanja
                A je lii, prepun je vrijedjanja? Nije uvreda kad se za nas koji se slazemo sa Novakovom izjavom kaze da bi voljeli zenu vidjeti kao u srednjem vijeku, bez prava i dostojanstva? Da smo sovinisti, zenomrzci i sta sve jos.. A moje "uvrede" su bile da me tolika ogorcenost vas pojedinih podsjeca na narko-apstinente koji ponavljaju jedno te isto u agoniji? Oooo, da znam ko moze da se sluzi uvredljivim metaforama, a ko ne.. nema duplih arsina odje, sve fer i korektno, da..
                Mada, mislim da je ipak kljucna moja "uvreda" bila sto sam pomenuo neke koji su Novaka optuzivali za dopicg, pa se onda zbog "grize savjesti" htjeli samobanovat. Sramota, koliko sujete...

                Comment


                • Da, a nisi dovoljno velika osoba da mi kazes neke stvari u lice, nego si i kukavica i kazes tamo neki su se samobanovali
                  Mogla bih cak i da napisem kakva je to karakterna osobina, ali cu se ipak suzdrzati.
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Bojana, imam jedno pitanje za tebe, da li smatras da i takmicari u dubl konkurenciji(ovi top uglavnom igraju samo dubl) treba da zaradjuju jednako kao i u singl jer i oni su se isto odricali u zivotu da bi bili tu gde jesu? Nagrade u dublu su visestruko manje, a jos se dele na dva dela, zasto nikad niko nije trazio ravnopravnost za njih, a manje nagrade se naravno vezuju za to da privlace manje paznje, manje sponzora itd, isto sto je i Novak mislio za zene (mada je bio veoma nespretan, mora se priznati), ali svima koji nisu vodjeni cisto mrznjom ili zavisti je jasno da nema tu nikakvog sovinizma, seksizma, i sta vec misls da je bilo.
                    sloboda ili ništa

                    Comment


                    • Posto ocigledno niko nije procitao blog, ovo je poenta price:

                      You see, equal prize money in tennis doesn’t have to be strictly about economics. It can be a chance for tennis to say, “We value women just as much as we value men.” It can be a chance for tennis to say, “Women’s tennis is just as worthwhile and exciting and interesting as is men’s tennis.” It can be a chance for tennis to say, “The world is filled with sexism, and it sucks. We’re taking a stand against it because we think women are amazing and completely equal in value to men.
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Ja iskreno nemam nista protiv toga da se zaradjuje isto, ali imam protiv novinara zapadnih aka laznih moralista, i da se pise nesto sto nema veze sa vezom, cuj Novak Djokovic sovinista.

                        Women’s tennis is just as worthwhile and exciting and interesting as is men’s tennis.
                        A sto se ovoga tice, cak ni ti ne verujes u ovo.
                        sloboda ili ništa

                        Comment


                        • Ali oni ne zaradjuju isto, kao da su to svi smetnuli sa uma. Oni zaradjuju isto samo na zajednickim turnirima, dakle na slemovima i na 4 zajednicka mastersa, na ostalim turnirima se nagrade razlikuju.

                          Pogledaj finale u nedelju, Vika i Serena su odigrale dobar i zanimljiv mec, a ne bih to mogla da kazem za musko finale.
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Kako da bude zanimljivo muško finale kada je Đoković toliko dominantan u odnosu na sve ostale da je ta razlika za nevericu.
                            Rođina domniacija je ista takva bila, previše dosadna, previše smešnih protivnika, dok se nije pojavio Nadal.
                            Ženski tenis retko kada bude bolji od muškog. Čak i sama si mnogo puta iskazivala negodovanje kada prenose Radvansku i uopšte ženski tenis za koji si rekla da te poprilično smara. Postovi postoje i mrzi me da ih tražim. Sećaš se da sam te iz sprdanje prozivao da si seksista?

                            Ne znam ja da moram gledati Govortsovu-Tsurenko u 5 setova na Roland Garosu obesio bih se trećeg dana njihovog meča pošto sam siguran da bi toliko trajalo.
                            There's something wrong with me chemically
                            Something wrong with me inherently
                            The wrong mix in the wrong genes
                            I reached the wrong ends by the wrong means
                            It was the wrong plan
                            In the wrong hands
                            With the wrong theory for the wrong man
                            The wrong lies, on the wrong vibes
                            The wrong questions with the wrong replies

                            Comment


                            • Jašta, a da se nađeš kojim slučajem na GSu sa kartom za sporedne terene, sasvim sigurno bi prije gledao meč Gabashvili-Gombos, a ne Juliju Georges i Carolinu Wozniacki

                              Comment


                              • Ostavila sam clanak iz 2002. gde se najstrasnije pljuje ATP i osudjuje kako se slepa uz WTA.
                                Da li su tada zene vise zaradjivale?
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X