Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATP World Tour Series 250 - 2016. godina

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by NI View Post
    Sve se mijenja ako se podloge znatno ubrzaju. Ali ne vjerujem da ce se to desiti. Publika voli defanzivce. Publika voli Ferera. Njegovi mecevi su u cesto vrlo uzbudljivi.
    U kom svetu publika voli Ferera?
    U kom svetu publika voli da gleda dosadna prebacivanja?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
      U kom svetu publika voli Ferera?
      U kom svetu publika voli da gleda dosadna prebacivanja?
      Daj odmori. Ne sudi ostatak svijeta po sebi.

      Janko Tipsarevic je jednom u zivotu dozivio "standing ovation". U mecu sa Fererom na USO. Dzumhur je najvise pokazao u mecu sa Fererom. Znas li sto prosjecan navijac pamti od zadnjeg WTf-a? Mec Nadal-Federer.

      Znasli zasto su podloge drasticno usporene iza 2000? Tenis je postajao nezanimljiv publici. Pricam o masi ljudi od kojih zavisi kolicina novaca koji je u opticaju.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by NI View Post
        Daj odmori. Ne sudi ostatak svijeta po sebi.

        Janko Tipsarevic je jednom u zivotu dozivio "standing ovation". U mecu sa Fererom na USO. Dzumhur je najvise pokazao u mecu sa Fererom. Znas li sto prosjecan navijac pamti od zadnjeg WTf-a? Mec Nadal-Federer.

        Znasli zasto su podloge drasticno usporene iza 2000? Tenis je postajao nezanimljiv publici. Pricam o masi ljudi od kojih zavisi kolicina novaca koji je u opticaju.
        Prvo, ton ti bas nije primeren, ali nema veze...

        Ja se bas nesto ne secam da se trazi karta vise za Fererove meceve, tako da tvoja prica ne pije vodu.
        Inace, ljudima je sve dosadnije i dosadnije da gledaju ta prebacivanja, i precesto mogu da se procitaju zahtevi za ubrzavanje podloga.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
          U kom svetu publika voli Ferera?
          U kom svetu publika voli da gleda dosadna prebacivanja?
          Pa pravi zaljubljenici u tenis vole da gledaju duge razmene.
          Meni se uopšte ne sviđa meč na kome se sve rešava posle dva tri udarca.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Weltschmerz View Post
            Pa pravi zaljubljenici u tenis vole da gledaju duge razmene.
            Meni se uopšte ne sviđa meč na kome se sve rešava posle dva tri udarca.
            Fererovi mecevi su ti uzbudljivi?
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Sta radi majstor!! Igraj ti pobratime i do 2020.
              Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

              sigpic

              Comment


              • Ovo je bolesno bilo, sta je pokupio sa osnovne linije
                Odlican mec, Dimitrov bas dobro igra
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                  Prvo, ton ti bas nije primeren, ali nema veze...

                  Ja se bas nesto ne secam da se trazi karta vise za Fererove meceve, tako da tvoja prica ne pije vodu.
                  Inace, ljudima je sve dosadnije i dosadnije da gledaju ta prebacivanja, i precesto mogu da se procitaju zahtevi za ubrzavanje podloga.
                  Da, slazem se ton nije primjeren. Ali to je nesto o cemu smo diskutvali vise puta. I dosao sam u situaciju da se dvoumim hocu li napisati potpuno netralni komentar tipa: "Statistaika pokazuje ad publika voli..." ili ne jer ocekujem tvoju reakciju. Nadao sam se da cu se prosvercovati. Nisam uspio.

                  Tenis se igra za publiku i to tako da se maksimizira kolicina novca u opticaju u teniskoj industriji. I nema veze sto se tebi svidja ili sto se meni svidja. Zato su usporene podloge i pored toga sto je americki tenis uvijek davao vise ofanzivaca nego defanzivaca tj. sto sa usporenim podlogama imas manju sansu da dobijes americku super zvijezdu. Americka super zvijezda bi bila i te kako korisna za najvece, americko, trziste. Od kuda dolazi kompenzacija? Publika voli gladijatore, voli razmjene, voli defanzivu.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                    Fererovi mecevi su ti uzbudljivi?
                    Rezultatski umeju i te kako Davidovi mecevi da budu uzbudljivi Bojana. Mislim znas ti to i sama. A cak i taj David ume da odigra fenomenalne udarce i da bude ucesnik nekih nezaboravnih poena. Njega jebe glava i to sto po pravilu gubi od boljih od sebe, ali se ne predaje pa je cak i u tim porazima dobar tenis zagarantovan.
                    A svedoci smo nekih Davidovih meceva na najvecoj sceni koji su zaista odlicni. Samo sto protiv najjacih je pobednik izvestan, pa iz te prizme gledanja nisu neizvesni, ali uzbudljivi jesu svakako.
                    sigpic

                    Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                    U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                    Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                    Comment


                    • Juce je bio odlican ali ovo je jos 3 puta bolje jer je i protivnik mnogo ozbiljniji, tesko ce ga neko spreciti da odbrani titulu, jedino Raonic ako izdrzi dva taj brejka nekako
                      Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • Meni njegovi mecevi nisu uzbudljivi, a i kad pogledate koliko ljudi ima u prvim kolima na njegovim mecevima, mislim da je jasno da ne spada u najuzbudljivije igrace.

                        Imao srece Role na set lopti, ali je bio bolji igrac tokom seta.
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Reseta covek kao na strelistu
                          Pancho Gonzalez ; Ivan Lendl ; Andre Agassi ; Rafael Nadal

                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by asprilja View Post
                            Cung se sigurno najbolje krece i najbolji je u polju od svih nabrojanih, medjutim servis mu je pretanak + mislim da ce mu na sljaci i travi biti osetno slabiji rezultati nego na HC-u. Kad bih tipovao koji ce GS nekad osvojiti, tipovao bih na Australiju, ali me ne bi cudilo ni UO da uzme.

                            Sto se Corica tice, sigurno najmanji talenat od pobrojanih ali mentalno najjaci. Ja mislim da ce nekako nekad upecati jedan GS.

                            Rublev je beskrajno talentovan ali mi se cini da ce on biti najmanje konstantan od Coric/Zverev/Rublev/Cung cetvorke. Nesto mi smrdi u vezi njega, da ga jebem ako znam sta Sigurno da ima potencijal da uzme par GS-ova.

                            Zverev se meni tu najvise dojmi. Stravicno se krece za svoju visinu, servis ce sigurno jos dodatno nabudziti, udara opasno. Morace malo vise na taktici da poradi. Takodje mora pod hitno da smanji broj duplih gresaka, neverovatan broj duplih pravi. Ima pobednicki mentalitet ali ima i velike uspone i padove u toku seta/meca, neretko okrece po 4-0, 5-1. Dobije set pa vodi, pa gubi dva brejka pa opet okrene, ali ima tu pobednicku crtu, kad zagusti, kad je sve protiv njega, kad mislis da se totalno raspao, fokusira se i izvuce mec. Mora da poradi na kontroli emocija, previse je emotivan i nervozan.

                            Edmundu tu najmanje verujem od svih, vec je dobar igrac, bice bez sumnje odlican ali nekako mi se cini da nema veliki prostor za napredak.

                            Meni se onaj Donaldsson cini kao fin talenat, strasan forhend, odlican servis, medjutim pretanak je u glavi za sad, plasljiv je i takticki nepismen.
                            Plasim se da ne postane neka malo bolja verzija Kvereja.

                            Eh da kad bih morao da stavim pare ko ce da uzme 5+ GS-ova od svih igraca koji dolaze, ja bih tipovao na malog Felixa
                            Sve je tacno u analizi.

                            No, nemoj zaboraviti da je Zverev imao bolju skolu zbog porodice u kojoj je odrstao. Ta inicijalna prednost ce da se topi.

                            Comment


                            • Kako je to Dimitrov igrao protiv Troickog, danas bas igra odlicno
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ClayWarrior View Post
                                Juce je bio odlican ali ovo je jos 3 puta bolje jer je i protivnik mnogo ozbiljniji, tesko ce ga neko spreciti da odbrani titulu, jedino Raonic ako izdrzi dva taj brejka nekako
                                Ja nesto ne vidim Raonica kako prolazi Tomica sutra
                                sloboda ili ništa

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X