Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roland Garros 2015

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Pitam Navrasa i ostale koji vatereno vjeruju da Novako odgovara da Nadal bude kod Federera:


    Sto je bolje?

    A) Nadal kod Federera; Nishikori i Mari kod Novaka ili

    B) Nishikori i Mari kod Federera; Nadal kod Novaka.

    Za mene je druga opcija daleko bolja.
    Last edited by NI; 19-05-15, 14:24.

    Comment


    • #32
      Najbolje je: Sve kod Federera, pa neka se jebu kako znaju i umeju i neka najbolji odande dodje Novaku u finalu. Ali toliko srece Novak tesko da ce imati.
      Last edited by Sandugp; 19-05-15, 14:27.
      sigpic

      Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

      U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
      Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

      Comment


      • #33
        Treba docekati petak i zreb, ove kalkulacije su vec postale prenaporne
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • #34
          @NI

          Pod A. Druga opcija otvara mogucnost da se Kei/Skot/Federer okoriste polufinalnim mecom Nadal-Novak i da na mala vrata dodju do titule. To je za mene najgori svenario. Kei-Skot-Rafa je mozda i lakse nego Rafa-Skot/Kei/Federer prevashodno zbog emotivne ispraznjenosti koja bi nastala pobedom nad Nadalom u ranijoj fazi. A ne treba zanemariti ni fizicki aspekt. Sta ako se ponovi AO 2012? Neko od pomenutog trojca bi dobio titulu na srebrnom posluzavniku.

          Ponavljam, Novak ako je bolji pobedice Nadala bilo kada.

          Originally posted by Sandugp View Post
          Najbolje je: Sve kod Federera, pa neka se jebu kako znaju i umeju i neka najbolji odande dodje Novaku u finalu. Ali tolik osrece Novak tesko da ce imati.
          Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

          Comment


          • #35
            Odlicno otvaranje teme, bravo wanderer
            Novak apsolutni favorit, Nadal tesko ce ovde nesta iole ozbiljnije napraviti.
            OVAKO

            Comment


            • #36
              Meni je svejedno, pošto ne volim ni jednog za protivnika, mislim strepim, šta ću...a neko će biti sigurno, da ne bude samo obrnuto od Sanduove želje... a ne zamerite mu radi sa penzionerima u SRB...
              sigpic

              Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
              But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

              Comment


              • #37
                Vani dobio Ungura posle 4 sata poslednji set dobio Italijan 16-14
                Dreams are coming true.


                Marcello Lippi: „Usporeni snimci akcija nisu realan fudbal. Svi mi želimo da vidimo Moniku Beluči golu, ali ne želimo da je gledamo kroz rendgen“.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Navras View Post
                  @NI

                  Pod A. Druga opcija otvara mogucnost da se Kei/Skot/Federer okoriste polufinalnim mecom Nadal-Novak i da na mala vrata dodju do titule. To je za mene najgori svenario. Kei-Skot-Rafa je mozda i lakse nego Rafa-Skot/Kei/Federer prevashodno zbog emotivne ispraznjenosti koja bi nastala pobedom nad Nadalom u ranijoj fazi. A ne treba zanemariti ni fizicki aspekt. Sta ako se ponovi AO 2012? Neko od pomenutog trojca bi dobio titulu na srebrnom posluzavniku.
                  Naporni smo Bojana ali nije nam lako.

                  Navras,

                  Rekoh da mene najvise zanima koja opcija daje najvece sanse Novaku za titulu. Ne zanima me ko moze da se okoristi eventualnom Novakovom pobjednom nad Nadalom.

                  1.
                  Ako Kai, Mari i Federer budu skupa, sanse su 10% da ce Japanac biti u finalu, koji ce biti umoran u tom slucaju; 35% da ce to biti Federer, sto i nije tako lose za Novaka; 5% da ce to biti neko drugi, sto isto tako nije lose; i 50% da ce biti Mari, sto jeste dosta zeznuto finale.

                  2.
                  Skeptik je u osnovi u pravu, iako je svoju ideju malo zaobilazno prezentirao. Za Novaka je jedino stavrno los zrijeb ako mora da pobijedi i Marija i Nadala. I tako dugo dok Nadal ide na Marija prije nego na Novaka, zrijeb nije jako los.

                  Zato 1/4 zrijeb Kai na Novaka, Mari na Rafu a potom da pobjednici igraju u polufinalu i nije tako los. Skoro da bih i to potpisao, samo da ne bude gore.
                  Last edited by NI; 19-05-15, 15:03.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Pa jedno je kad izadje zreb, onda nesto moze da se analizira, sad samo pricate SBBKBB, a ne mozete nikako da uticate na ishod zreba.

                    U krajnjem, ako je Djokovic toliko dominantan i jak, zreb ne bi trebao da vam bude uopste bitan, makar je meni bilo tako kad je Role dominirao
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Bojana,

                      Odmah prestajem ako mozes srediti da Rafa igra sa Sederlingom u 4. kolu.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by NI View Post
                        Bojana,

                        Odmah prestajem ako mozes srediti da Rafa igra sa Sederlingom u 4. kolu.
                        Da li je neko tada ocekivao da ga Soderling dobije, posebno sto ga je ovaj u Rimu par nedelja pre toga odrao?
                        Vi se sada koncentrisete na neke standardne igrace (Marej, Kei, eventualno Stan..) a mozda se pojavi neki nov Soderling
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          @NI

                          Najvece sanse su ako Nadala neko izbaci pre duela sa Novakom bez obzira u kojoj se polovini nalazi. Tu se ja mislim slazemo Nakon toga najvise sansi ima ako je Nadal na drugoj strani i ceka ga u finalu. Tu sad ostaju varijante tipa da li mora preko Keia i Skota, samo preko jednog ili nijednog. U zavisnosti od toga sanse variraju. Najmanje sansi ima ako je Nadal u njegovoj polovini iz razloga koje sam u prethodnom postu pobrojao. Videli smo u MC-u sta se desilo nakon pobede nad Rafom u sf. Najgora opcija za mene je Nadal-Skot SF i F. Skot-Nadal je dosta povoljnije.
                          Last edited by Navras 16950; 19-05-15, 15:46.
                          Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Izasa zreb za kvalifikacije za zene:
                            http://www.rolandgarros.com/en_FR/dr....html?event=PS

                            od nasih samo Jaksic, a mozda i jos neko, ali onaj zreb je toliko nepregledan da je to strasno
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Po meni samo da Wawa nije kod nas. Da ne rizikujemo da li ce njegov ludacki dan biti (pri kraju) protiv Novaka.
                              Posto trenutno zbog Milosa R. ne znamo bas sve... ako se moze malo lupetati pa birati ja bi na nasu stranu Murray-a i Kei
                              Pored toga sto @NI ima strah od Japanca zbog razmena sa BL sa cim se naravno slazem ali ipak mislim da Kei 2015 + forma u kojoj je nema sanse da izdrzi npr. 5. setova.
                              Mari, blizu je ali mislim da ako dodje do meca sa Novakom, nece mu nista pomoci. Psihologija je to. Ako ga je Novak posle 2012. dobijao "rutinski" zasto bi to bio problem i na ovom RG.
                              Eto uzeli smo dva jaka na sebe a dali smo "drugoj strani" da naprave medju sobom pokolj ala "Game of thrones" pa neka vide kome ce kada i protiv koga biti
                              odlican ili los dan.
                              >>> Brojim Izbrojao sam sate, minute, sekunde do pogleda na Mourinja u dresu MANCHESTER UNITED-a ! <<<

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Ne moze Chung do gejma kakva sila

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X