Tweet
Ne svidja se mnogima, ali tako je 
-
-
Samo cijeli brojevi dolaze u obzirOriginally posted by miloolja View PostDobro ti ova matematika ide, boga ti, ali opet mi se ne sviđa proporcija, iako nisi ništa slagao, ali ima drugo značenje
EDIT mogao si i Nole*Rafa:33,7748 = Role
Comment
-
Nije tebi matematika bila jaca stranaOriginally posted by Vladan View Post
samo da znas, da se ne brukes ubuduce
100x0=0
10000x0=0http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Originally posted by miloolja View PostDobro ti ova matematika ide, boga ti, ali opet mi se ne sviđa proporcija, iako nisi ništa slagao, ali ima drugo značenje
EDIT mogao si i Nole*Rafa:33,7748 = Role
Comment
-
I onda Vlajko se svadja sa mnom oko finansijaOriginally posted by bojanaBG View PostNije tebi matematika bila jaca strana
samo da znas, da se ne brukes ubuduce
100x0=0
10000x0=0
Dobro mozda je lapsus bio
sigpic
"IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"Comment
-
Pa nije se obrukao, on je rekao da se samo ubaci pored onog sto je shminka naveo. Sto mu na kraju krajeva dodje na isto
Comment
-
kako na isto?
je l' zna neko neko ovde matematiku?
x=Role=302 nedelje
y=Djokovic=100
z=Nadal=102
x=2y+z
valjda je sad jasnije
a moze da stavlja Mareja i Delpa koliko hoce, oni imaju 0 nedelja na prvom mestuhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Nikad necemo saznati sta je mag mislio u tom trenutku
sigpic
"IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"Comment
-
Bojana deder majke ti ne palamudi, dizvines na izrazu, radi se o dodavanju ili ti sabiranju. Znaci mnozi se ono sto je shminka naveo i onda se dodaje/sabira ono sto je Vladan predlozio i eto sve 5
Comment
-
Ne palamudim
ali sa matematicke strane, tupavo je vuci nepoznatu koja se mnozi sa 0, posto je po toj logici onda shminka mogao da stavi skoro ceo ATP tour
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
Et' vidis Vlajko jesam te izvuko
Comment
-
Ništa vam ova matematika ne valjaOriginally posted by bojanaBG View Postkako na isto?
je l' zna neko neko ovde matematiku?
x=Role=302 nedelje
y=Djokovic=100
z=Nadal=102
x=2y+z
valjda je sad jasnije
a moze da stavlja Mareja i Delpa koliko hoce, oni imaju 0 nedelja na prvom mestu
A evo za Shminku i celi brojevi Nole:Rafa*308=Role
Ili najprostije vala Nole+Rafa+100=Role okruglo i celo da ne može biti više...
Daću ja vama 2*Nole i ostale homonime
sigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.Comment
-
Znamo mi sta je shminka mislio
.. Lepo je napisao 2x Novak
[QUOTE miloolja;1098961]Ništa vam ova matematika ne valja
A evo za Shminku i celi brojevi Nole:Rafa*308=Role
Ili najprostije vala Nole+Rafa+100=Role okruglo i celo da ne može biti više...
Daću ja vama 2*Nole i ostale homonime [/QUOTE]
Nikad mi ova matematika nije isla od ruke, delovala mi je kao kineska slova
Last edited by Lord Aleksoni; 23-09-13, 23:59.Comment
-
ali posto je Nole=100, onda moze to krace da se napise
2xNole+Rafa= Role
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
-
100+ Role =
Role
Roletova teorema rešenja jednačine sa jednom poznatom
sigpicComment
Comment