Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATP Rankings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: ATP Rankings

    Od 5 Mastersa do kraja godine ima jos samo jedan na sljaci,ostali su na hardu(otvoreni i dvorana) sto znaci da na ta 4 nece doci do titule @(*6sd$%
    Na USO i onako nikad nista vise od polufinala nije uradio(prebrzo je to za njegov napadacki tenis $#^%RT),ostaje mu RG,a sto se W-a tice Nadal iz Rima nema sta da trazi ni protiv Rodika na W,a kamoli protiv Federera @(*6sd$%
    Ali ce uzeti fine bodove,jer nista ne brani na W!
    sigpic

    Comment


    • Re: ATP Rankings

      [quote author=Vladan link=topic=2171.msg128912#msg128912 date=1273058409]
      Od 5 Mastersa do kraja godine ima jos samo jedan na sljaci,ostali su na hardu(otvoreni i dvorana) sto znaci da na ta 4 nece doci do titule @(*6sd$%
      Na USO i onako nikad nista vise od polufinala nije uradio(prebrzo je to za njegov napadacki tenis $#^%RT),ostaje mu RG,a sto se W-a tice Nadal iz Rima nema sta da trazi ni protiv Rodika na W,a kamoli protiv Federera @(*6sd$%
      Ali ce uzeti fine bodove,jer nista ne brani na W!
      [/quote]

      Zivi bili, pa vidjeli ;)
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2wI197Vvg4 <3

      Comment


      • Re: ATP Rankings

        [quote author=Vladan link=topic=2171.msg128912#msg128912 date=1273058409]
        Od 5 Mastersa do kraja godine ima jos samo jedan na sljaci,ostali su na hardu(otvoreni i dvorana) sto znaci da na ta 4 nece doci do titule @(*6sd$%
        Na USO i onako nikad nista vise od polufinala nije uradio(prebrzo je to za njegov napadacki tenis $#^%RT),ostaje mu RG,a sto se W-a tice Nadal iz Rima nema sta da trazi ni protiv Rodika na W,a kamoli protiv Federera @(*6sd$%
        Ali ce uzeti fine bodove,jer nista ne brani na W!
        [/quote]
        pitanje je samo šta je sa Federerom.. da li je ovo ispadanje u drugom kolu Rima bio loš dan.. ili nešto drugo (nisam gledala meč)..
        Originally posted by gokara
        Valjda ćemo dočekati dan da kloniraju Federera pa da možemo da ne gasimo televizore kad igraju svi koji nisu Federer i uživamo u meču Federer-Federer.

        Comment


        • Re: ATP Rankings

          Malo sporije pali,ali uvijek najbolji bude na GS-ovima i svakako su mu sad prioritet @(*6sd$%
          One godine kad je Nadal uzeo W,igrao je u drugom kolu cini mi se protiv Gulbisa i izgubio prvi set,tada je Nadal igrao najbolji tenis u karijeri(uz onaj sa pocetka prosle godina na AO i IW,potom i MC,Barca,Rome i Madrid).
          E zamislite da mu ove godine na W dodje Gulbis,onaj Gulbis iz Rima koji je na sljaci imao 50 vinera $#^%RT

          Ernests Gulbis &amp;8@^J $#^%RT

          http://www.b92.net/sport/tenis/vesti...;nav_id=428563
          sigpic

          Comment


          • Re: ATP Rankings

            [quote author=Vladan link=topic=2171.msg128929#msg128929 date=1273066821]
            Ernests Gulbis &amp;8@^J $#^%RT

            http://www.b92.net/sport/tenis/vesti...;nav_id=428563
            [/quote]
            kao i obično, novinari malo izvuku iz konteksta, pitam se ipak da li to stvarno Gulbis misli..
            istina je da ni Nadal, ni Federer nisu nepobedivi i to je dobro.. jednostavno dosadi dugotrajna dominacija nekog igrača..
            Originally posted by gokara
            Valjda ćemo dočekati dan da kloniraju Federera pa da možemo da ne gasimo televizore kad igraju svi koji nisu Federer i uživamo u meču Federer-Federer.

            Comment


            • Re: ATP Rankings

              Ako Nadal osvoji RG,a Roger ispadne pre SF,Nadal preuzima 1.poziciju,ja mislim da je ovo tacno &amp;%@5w8&amp;*

              Comment


              • Re: ATP Rankings

                [quote author=fc nadal link=topic=2171.msg131617#msg131617 date=1274116652]
                Ako Nadal osvoji RG,a Roger ispadne pre SF,Nadal preuzima 1.poziciju,ja mislim da je ovo tacno &amp;%@5w8&amp;*
                [/quote]

                lijepo si shvatio moj izracun @(*6sd$%

                također ako nadal osvoji RG i bude igrao u polufinalu W on je 1. bez obzira na rogerove rezultate

                Comment


                • Re: ATP Rankings

                  17.5.2010


                  Rafica na drugom mjestu! %QWT&amp;W
                  sigpic
                  Gdje Nato kaze, pa bilo kroz zid, ili u vatru, ili u vulkan, tu Mandusic ide bez pogovora!!!

                  Comment


                  • Re: ATP Rankings

                    ......

                    Comment


                    • Re: ATP Rankings

                      7.6.2010.

                      Rafica na prvom mjestu %QWT&amp;W @(*6sd$%
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2wI197Vvg4 <3

                      Comment


                      • Re: ATP Rankings

                        scenario po kojem Roger vec posle Toronta moze da se vrati na no.1



                        normalno, ovo je samo matematika, posle W ce stvari biti mnogo jasnije @(*6sd$%
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Re: ATP Rankings

                          To je cista matematika..Tesko ce se to ostvariti *#AI&amp;D

                          Comment


                          • Re: ATP Rankings

                            Pa nije toliko sulud scenario, da Rafica osvoji Kvins, ispadne u QF W i ispadne u QF Toronta, ali Roger mora da osvoji ta 3 turnira. Zato i kazem, posle W ce biti mnogo jasnija situacija, ali YE ce biti neizvestan, posto posle USO Nadal brani vise poena od Rogera.
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Re: ATP Rankings

                              Ali opet kakve su sanse da ispadne i na W i u Torontu u QF ili ranije,a igra u fantasticnoj formi @(*6sd$%


                              Ali meni je najsmesnije kako Marej i Djokovic nikako ne mogu da nekako dodju do 1.poziciju &amp;*#GI(]

                              Comment


                              • Re: ATP Rankings

                                Uvek postoji sansa, a i to nije sljaka nego trava i HC.

                                Sigurna sam da i Djokovic moze do no.1, ali Federer i Nadal bi morali bas lose da igraju, posebno sto posle USO Djokovic brani ja mislim najvise poena.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X