Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rim 2015.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by NI View Post
    Zato sto nije prosao RG.
    Ponovo nema logike, jer ti kazem od kad Feda salju u penziju od kad je oborio Samprasov rekord, sto je bilo pre skoro 6 godina
    I pricao je o tome u intervjuu od pre neki dan...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by NI View Post
      Upravo realizacja BL potvrdjuje da Rafa igra na vrhunskom nivou. Da je Nadal imao svoju standardnu realizaciju BL, dobio bi sve te meceve i imao bi standardne rezultate.
      Ne znam kako los procenat iskoriscenosti brejk lopti moze govoriti o vrhunskom nivou. Vrhunski nivo prate i vrhunski rezultati sto sa sobom povlaci i visok procenat iskoriscenosti brejk lopti, to je povezano. On igra na dovoljno visokom nivou da bude i dalje kompetitivan ali to je daleko od vrunske igre uprotivnom ne bi ga Clayray i Stanimal razbili.

      Comment


      • Eh da je Rafi samo problem samopouzdanje lako bi on, kljucni problem je igra. Sinoc fh-om nista nije mogao da napravi, tim udarcem je u osmom gemu vratio Wawrinku u mec sa 4 ili 5 gresaka. Nema ostrine u udarcima, nema one penetrativne moci kao nekad. Servis mu je takodje prilicno klimav. Cim udarci zakazu pada i samopouzdanje i onda se desavaju porazi kao sinoc. No, i tako kljakav je i dalje dovoljno dobar za 90% toura.
        Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

        Comment


        • Mislim da se ocekuje da Federer ode u penziju sledece godine a ako bi i Nadal otisao, to bi bi veliki udarac za tenis i lovu koju mnogi zaradjuju na njima.

          Comment


          • Juce je bio najveci problem Vavrinka, koji je igrao neverovatno dobro, a Nadalov stil je da se povuce 5 metara i da vraca, medjutim od onakvih bombi realno nema odbrane.

            i btw. Stanimal kralj

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Koji crni Wawrinka, covek se ponudio u sedmom gemu na tacni, nije vise znao kud bije. Vrhunski Nadal bi tim strasnim Wawrinkom obrisao sljaku. I kad je imao dupli brejk malo je falilo da chokne
              Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Juce je bio najveci problem Vavrinka, koji je igrao neverovatno dobro, a Nadalov stil je da se povuce 5 metara i da vraca, medjutim od onakvih bombi realno nema odbrane.
                Ali,Rafa je Wawu vratio u mec onim lošim gemom na 4:3 u prvom setu,da nije choknuo tada dobio bi rutinski mec

                Comment


                • Originally posted by shminka View Post
                  Šta će u penziji, neka ga sa rajom
                  Obozavam tvoj humor. Jesi li ti siguran da nemas nista mostarsko u sebi?

                  Comment


                  • Ma kakve bombe Bojana, o cemu ti govoris... Stan je igrao dobro, tu nema sumnje, ali problem je bio u Nadala. Nisu ga te bombe naterale na 4-3 da napravi 4 amaterske greske iz FH-a I da pokloni Wawrinku brejk. Nisu ga te bombe naterale da opet pokloni brejk Wawrinku kod 1-0 I 30-0. Nisu ga te bombe naterale da na 1-1 u drugom setu promasi dva cista forhenda, nesto sto je ranije zatvorenim ocima pogadjao.

                    Sent from my Grand X In using Tapatalk
                    OVAKO

                    Comment


                    • I da, nije Nadal igrao onako defanzivno zato sto tako obozava vec iz nuzde jer kad god bi pokusao da preuzme inicijativu i diktira fh-om najcesce bi se zavrsilo greskom. Od fh-a koji je izbijao rekete iz ruku nije ostalo skoro nista
                      Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View Post
                        Ma kakve bombe Bojana, o cemu ti govoris... Stan je igrao dobro, tu nema sumnje, ali problem je bio u Nadala. Nisu ga te bombe naterale na 4-3 da napravi 4 amaterske greske iz FH-a I da pokloni Wawrinku brejk. Nisu ga te bombe naterale da opet pokloni brejk Wawrinku kod 1-0 I 30-0. Nisu ga te bombe naterale da na 1-1 u drugom setu promasi dva cista forhenda, nesto sto je ranije zatvorenim ocima pogadjao.

                        Sent from my Grand X In using Tapatalk
                        Ok taj gem na 4:3, ali sta je bilo u TBu na 6:2 za Nadala?
                        Jbg., kad Stan krene da gadja linije sa obe strane i to sa po 140km/h, 150 km/h tesko da bilo ko moze da se odbrani.

                        A takodje, ona 2 poraza od Fonjinija, pa donekle i poraz od Mareja je ono sto trenutno najvise steti Nadalu, tj. igraci u svlacionici su shvatili da je Nadal pobediv na sljaci.
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Ali Navrase, da je to konstantno ok, shvatio bih, nije u formi I to je to, ali ne moze da odigra dva ili tri sjajna meca za redom, da svi udarci funkcionisu I onda u sledeci mec da nestane I FH I servis I sve sta moze da nestane. Meni to brine, I to previse.

                          Sent from my Grand X In using Tapatalk
                          OVAKO

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                            Ok taj gem na 4:3, ali sta je bilo u TBu na 6:2 za Nadala?
                            Jbg., kad Stan krene da gadja linije sa obe strane i to sa po 140km/h, 150 km/h tesko da bilo ko moze da se odbrani.

                            A takodje, ona 2 poraza od Fonjinija, pa donekle i poraz od Mareja je ono sto trenutno najvise steti Nadalu, tj. igraci u svlacionici su shvatili da je Nadal pobediv na sljaci.
                            Hoces da kazes da je Nadal igrao dobro ali ipak nenadmasljivi Stan je odradio svoje? Nemoj molim te, chokirao je I Stan za sve pare, kakve gluposte je radio u drugom setu, samo imao je srecu sto je imao nesposoban protivnik protiv sebe. Stan je odigrao dobro ali nista narocito niti specijalno. Normalni Nadal bi to resio u dva seta uz 6-7 izgubljenih gemova maksimum.

                            Sent from my Grand X In using Tapatalk
                            OVAKO

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View Post
                              Hoces da kazes da je Nadal igrao dobro ali ipak nenadmasljivi Stan je odradio svoje? Nemoj molim te, chokirao je I Stan za sve pare, kakve gluposte je radio u drugom setu, samo imao je srecu sto je imao nesposoban protivnik protiv sebe. Stan je odigrao dobro ali nista narocito niti specijalno. Normalni Nadal bi to resio u dva seta uz 6-7 izgubljenih gemova maksimum.

                              Sent from my Grand X In using Tapatalk
                              E sad i ti preterujes, mec je bio odlican i Stan je odigrao odlicno inace da nije, nema sanse da bi pobedio.
                              Mozda je Nadal propao, ali je i na 4:1 grizao i imao sanse da vrati brejk, samo sto je Stan tu nalazio neverovatne udarce ili servise.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Pa to i jeste glavni problem, prevelike oscilacije. Ne moze da igra na vrhunskom nivou u kontinuitetu, iz dana u dan, iz meca u mec. Previse oscilira i u toku samih meceva, prosto nema konstantnosti. Jos kad neko moze da ga pritisne kao Stan sinoc problemi se umnozavaju i pocinje da ga hvata panika jer zna da mu udarci nisu dovoljno dobri.

                                Na RG ce mu biti lakse jer ima dan pauze izmedju meceva, plus se sve igra u dnevnim terminima sto Nadalu daleko vise odgovara.

                                Sto se tice Stana, covek ima bar pet kila viska i krajnje problematicno kretanje. Takvog Wawrinku bi vrhunski Nadal pospremio bez po muke. U svakom slucaju, treba mu odati priznanje sto je iskoristio ukazanu sansu.
                                Last edited by Navras 16950; 16-05-15, 14:18.
                                Tom, your music is the best drinking partner I've ever had.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X