Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Open 2014.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by pecaros View Post
    E Srbijo, a jesmo rekli da nema gomilanja funkcija.
    Makar si završila sa bdenjima, Role u subotu igra dnevni termin.
    i dalje sam ja samo inzenjer

    normalno da igra dnevni termin za vikend, to je uvek tako
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Ne razumijem odluku da ide na tanjir u finalu umjesto poraza u 1/4. Mislim ovo drugo dosta bezbolnije.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
        Ne razumijem odluku da ide na tanjir u finalu umjesto poraza u 1/4. Mislim ovo drugo dosta bezbolnije.
        E pa vidis, to je kljucna razilka izmedju mog i tvog omiljenog igraca, tvoj pukne ranije, samo da ne igra protiv najboljih, moj nikad to ne radi, nego uvek igra do kraja
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
          Ne razumijem odluku da ide na tanjir u finalu umjesto poraza u 1/4. Mislim ovo drugo dosta bezbolnije.
          A ti bi volio da gubis od levata nakon godina mukotrpnog rada?
          sigpic
          "IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
          AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"

          Comment


          • Originally posted by maliajnstajn View Post
            A ti bi volio da gubis od levata nakon godina mukotrpnog rada?
            Stani bruda, od kakvih je on igraca prosle godine gubio trenutni Monfils je za njih igracina samo takva, tako da mu to ne bi predstavljalo problem.



            Bojana, opste poznata stvar je da hejteri koriste svaki Nadalov poraz da pokrenu tu pricu ali to su samo hejteri i moraju ostati u formi. Cak idu daleko da on izmislja povrede, a to je vec nesto drugo...
            Last edited by DinoFC; 05-09-14, 08:19.

            Comment


            • FC, prosle godine je on bio povredjen, te rezultate mozes slobodno da zaboravis.
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Ja mislim da si ti par puta izricito rekla da ako je teniser povrijedjen onda ne treba da igra ako vec igra onda mozemo da to dovedemo u pitanje.

                Comment


                • E jebiga sad hronicni tendonitis koji je nenormalno opasan porediti sa bolom u ledjima koji ne znas kad ce doci, a kada oticin, ne mere jebiga
                  sigpic
                  "IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
                  AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"

                  Comment


                  • Ako ti ne vidis da su proslogodisnji i ovogodisnji Federer, 2 razlicita igraca i ako mislis da se on odjednom ove godine podmladio i da je to razlog njegove bolje igre, onda ja ne mogu da ti pomognem
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Pa jednostavno ne igras kad te boli, tj. zaboli ako je on igrao pod bolom u 32. godini zivota onda to i nije najbistriji potez.

                      Comment


                      • Njega su zajebavala ledja, nije mogao da trenira 100%, znaci da nije bio spreman 100%, plus se plasio da ide na svaku loptu, da ne napravi neki pogresan potez, ja ne znam sta je to toliko tesko shvatiti
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Nije jebiga ni najbistriji potez baviti se sportom kada imas hronicni tendonitis, pa eno ga drugi najbolji igrac u historiji
                          sigpic
                          "IF YOU CAN MEET WITH TRIUMPH AND DISASTER
                          AND TREAT THOSE TWO IMPOSTORS JUST THE SAME"

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                            Njega su zajebavala ledja, nije mogao da trenira 100%, znaci da nije bio spreman 100%, plus se plasio da ide na svaku loptu, da ne napravi neki pogresan potez, ja ne znam sta je to toliko tesko shvatiti
                            Pa ne bi bilo problem shvatiti da je tu bilo par preskoceni turnira i pokusaja rehabilitacije, nego cak stavise bilo dodavanje turnira poput Hamubrga i onog domaceg kako se vec zove

                            Akiša, ali pauze su cijena koju placa

                            Comment


                            • Kladionice prije polufinala:

                              Code:
                              Polufinalni mecevi:
                              
                              Novak    89%
                              Rodzer   75.2%
                              
                              
                              
                              Pobjednik turnira:
                              
                              Novak	   64.7%  +24.6%
                              Rodzer	   26.5%   +4.0%
                              Cilic      4.9%
                              Nishikori  3.9%

                              Federer je malo porastao od pocetka turnira. Ima istu kvotu kao i poslije prvog kola. Samo 75% protiv Cilica, igraca sa kojim je 5:0. To je posljedica meca sa Monfisom.
                              Last edited by NI; 05-09-14, 08:56.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
                                Pa ne bi bilo problem shvatiti da je tu bilo par preskoceni turnira i pokusaja rehabilitacije, nego cak stavise bilo dodavanje turnira poput Hamubrga i onog domaceg kako se vec zove

                                Akiša, ali pauze su cijena koju placa
                                Pa niko nije rekao da je on povlacio perfektne poteze prosle godine, izjavio je vise puta da je pogresio, u Hamburgu je ponovo sjebao ledja, ali nije hteo da se povuce iz Gstaada, bas zato sto je domaci turnir.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X