Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roland Garros 2014. - Uživo komentarisanje mečeva

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by conviction View Post
    Što se tiče "odugovlačenja", Marija nema ništa sa tim. Neka se protivnici bune ako im to smeta a ne vi ovdje na forumu.
    Interesantna logika.

    Sto ce nama onda linijski sudije i glavni sudija ako igracice treba same da donose sudijske odluke.?

    A kako Halep treba da mjeri 20 sekundi izmedju poena?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by jagodica View Post
      E, neka si nam rekao!!
      Sutra neka se Nole buni kad Rafa bude odugovlačio, sudija je tu samo reda radi..
      Ne opravdavam što sudije tolerišu prekoračenje dozvoljenog vremena i nisu oni tu sam reda radi, daleko od toga. Ali zar nije normalno da ako nešto nije po pravilima da se pobuniš i ukažeš sudiji na nepravilnosti. U ovom slučaju Halep je trebala da se protivi tom odugovlačenju ako joj je to baš smetalo.

      Sutra ako Nadal bude prekoračavao dozvoljeno vrijeme a sudija ga ne bude opominjao sasvim je normalno da Novak reaguje.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by NI View Post
        Interesantna logika.

        Sto ce nama onda linijski sudije i glavni sudija ako igracice treba same da donose sudijske odluke.?

        A kako Halep treba da mjeri 20 sekundi izmedju poena?
        Rekoh da Marija nema ništa sa tim. Sudija je prvi koji treba da reaguje, sa tim se slažem. Međutim, u dosta mečeva je prisutno to da se sudije ne drže dosljedno svih pravila pa su igrači prinuđeni da reaguju. To je činjenica, nigdje ne opravdavam to što sudija prvi ne reaguje na prvu nepravilnost.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by proudNolee View Post
          Bas neki racit momak, pa riba (ljubav) ti je osvojia RG. a ti dve reci.
          >>> Brojim Izbrojao sam sate, minute, sekunde do pogleda na Mourinja u dresu MANCHESTER UNITED-a ! <<<

          Comment


          • Vamos Marc y Marsel
            Last edited by shpageti; 07-06-14, 18:38.
            SignaturE se cheka ...sigpic

            Comment


            • Originally posted by conviction View Post
              Rekoh da Marija nema ništa sa tim. Sudija je prvi koji treba da reaguje, sa tim se slažem. Međutim, u dosta mečeva je prisutno to da se sudije ne drže dosljedno svih pravila pa su igrači prinuđeni da reaguju. To je činjenica, nigdje ne opravdavam to što sudija prvi ne reaguje na prvu nepravilnost.
              Kako Marija nema nista sa time?

              Pa upravo ona ima sve sa time, ona pravi predugacke pauze. Protesti sudiji su i onako besmisleni. Sudija ne moze da reaguje jer nema hrabrosti da je kazni poen. Nema hrabrosti jer je Marija zvijezda.

              Ja licno ne mislim da je Marijin glavni cilj iritiranje protivnice, iako je toga danas bilo. Nadal to radi u prvom redu da povrati dah, i Djokovic iako u manjoj mjeri. Ali Marija to radi u prvom redu da ufura sebe u stanje 'poluhipnoze'. Da se totalno koncetrira na poen, da postgne fokus bez kojega ona ne moze nista.

              Comment


              • Bravo Marc,to je smesh !
                SignaturE se cheka ...sigpic

                Comment


                • Ajmo restart,kad ste mogli bracu B kuci poslat,mozete i ove u njihovom dvorishtu
                  SignaturE se cheka ...sigpic

                  Comment


                  • skroz je dobro musko finale dublova, trenutno pocinje TB u 2. setu
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Pobeda Francuza

                      Comment


                      • Beneto uzeo titulu

                        jeste da sam mu davala raznorazne nadimke, ali bas mi je drago sto je uzeo ovu titulu
                        inace, u paru sa Vaselinom, koji je bio odlican, jedno vreme je on nosio dubl, posto se po obicaju, Beneto uplasio
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                          Beneto uzeo titulu

                          jeste da sam mu davala raznorazne nadimke, ali bas mi je drago sto je uzeo ovu titulu
                          inace, u paru sa Vaselinom, koji je bio odlican, jedno vreme je on nosio dubl, posto se po obicaju, Beneto uplasio
                          Beneto konacno skinuo maler sa sebe, sad kad bi uzeo i u singlu

                          Comment


                          • Pa ima vise titula u dublu, ali u singlu nikako da osvoji, a kad nije onda protiv nesretnog Souse, ne znam kad ce
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                              Pa ima vise titula u dublu, ali u singlu nikako da osvoji, a kad nije onda protiv nesretnog Souse, ne znam kad ce
                              Nisam znao za dubl da ima titule, on bolje da batali singl i da s preorijentise na dubl totalno kao Ziki

                              Comment


                              • Бенету, вечити финалиста, најзад до трофеја изнад главе....
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X