Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TADBAS SPAM!!!

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

    [quote author=bojanaBG link=topic=1649.msg80685#msg80685 date=1249379805]
    nemojte da se zanosite,jos uvek se nije pojavio Federerov naslednik 8) 8)

    mozda onaj mali Bugarin Dimitrov,ali treba videti kako ce se prilagoditi...
    [/quote]

    ..

    1.Cinjenica je da gine za svaku loptu,to je viteski s njegove strane,ali kad si vidio da to Federer to radi,uzme brejk,i eto gotov set,nema mucenja i nepotrebnog trosenja
    2.Pa ja sam ti rekao da to nije fora,vec realnost 8)
    3.Neko se razvije prije i psihicki i fizicki (Nadal),neko poslije(nadam se Novak) 8)

    Sve se slazem,osim ove realnosti,to se ne moze desiti,ne mogu na to da mislim uopste. ;).

    Comment


    • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

      fc sta se smejes,ja sam mrtva ozbiljna,nema Federovog naslednika na vidiku.
      Nadji mi jednog igraca koji ima sve sto ima Federer,da igra sa takvom lakocom,da se tako lako krece po terenu,da igra prelepo,da ima toliku mentalnu snagu.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • [/quote]
        Pojavio se,samo treba da se UOZBILJI 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
        sigpic

        Comment


        • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

          [quote author=bojanaBG link=topic=1649.msg80687#msg80687 date=1249380133]
          fc sta se smejes,ja sam mrtva ozbiljna,nema Federovog naslednika na vidiku.
          Nadji mi jednog igraca koji ima sve sto ima Federer,da igra sa takvom lakocom,da se tako lako krece po terenu,da igra prelepo,da ima toliku mentalnu snagu.
          [/quote]

          Kakve veze ima lakoca igre,lepota igre,kakve to veze ima..Nadal ako ga zdravlje posluzi ce mozda stici Federera,po meni je Nadal federerov nasljednik samo pod uslovom da ne bude imao problema..To je moje videnje ove situacije..6 gs do 23 godine su mi dovoljni dokazi da poduprem ovu tvrdnju..

          Comment


          • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

            Ako sa 27 bude imao 15GS i 237 uzastopnih nedelja kao no.1 onda mozemo da pricamo.
            Zar ti ne vidis da on nije izdrzao da vlada ni godinu dana,a vec su ga stigli ogromni problemi sa kolenima,jos racunaj da je kraj prosle godine delimicno preskocio. A Federer je za razliku od njega 4 godine bukvalno vladao svetskim tenisom.

            I njega su uporedjivali sa svim velikanima tenisa kad jos nije imao nijedan GS,a nesto ne vidim da se to desava sa Nadalom sad kad ima cak 6GS.

            Nadal je odlican teniser,ali nikad nece biti u klasi sa Federerom,Samprasom,Borgom,Lejverom.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

              Ipak je LEJVER bio CUDO, i sigurno da konkurencija nije bila kakva je danas,ali to sto je on radio je prosto nevjerovatno 8)
              Ali najbolji teniser svih vremena je Federer(za sad),rezultati govore za njega,to je cinjenica
              sigpic

              Comment


              • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

                Sto se mene tice Lejver i Federer su najbolji igraci svih vremena

                Lejver je veliki sampion i sada,nije dao nijednu glupu izjavu ni sujetnu cime pokazuje koliko je veliki,za razliku od nekih (Borg,Vilander,....)
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

                  [quote author=bojanaBG link=topic=1649.msg80690#msg80690 date=1249380647]
                  Ako sa 27 bude imao 15GS i 237 uzastopnih nedelja kao no.1 onda mozemo da pricamo.
                  Zar ti ne vidis da on nije izdrzao da vlada ni godinu dana,a vec su ga stigli ogromni problemi sa kolenima,jos racunaj da je kraj prosle godine delimicno preskocio. A Federer je za razliku od njega 4 godine bukvalno vladao svetskim tenisom.

                  I njega su uporedjivali sa svim velikanima tenisa kad jos nije imao nijedan GS,a nesto ne vidim da se to desava sa Nadalom sad kad ima cak 6GS.


                  Nadal je odlican teniser,ali nikad nece biti u klasi sa Federerom,Samprasom,Borgom,Lejverom.
                  [/quote]

                  Comment


                  • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

                    Ja ti pricam istinu,pre 2003. i njegove pobede na Wimbliju,pricali su o njemu kao o jednom od najvecih talenata,posle one pobede nad Samprasom 2001 u 5.setova na Wimlbiju. Ali posle toga nije imao bas toliko zapazene rezultate i mislili su da ce biti jedan od onih neiskoriscenih talenata,tipa Gaske,ali drugacija stvar se desila.
                    Nadal jeste najveci igrac svih vremena na sljaci,ali samo na sljaci.

                    Federer pazi svoje telo,nije on sreckovic nego zna kad da igra,a kad da pravi pauzu i kad igra zna kako igra u 1.kolu,a kako u finalu. Za razliku od Nadala koji ne zna da dozira,nego mu je svaki mec kao finale.
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

                      [quote author=bojanaBG link=topic=1649.msg80695#msg80695 date=1249381615]
                      Ja ti pricam istinu,pre 2003. i njegove pobede na Wimbliju,pricali su o njemu kao o jednom od najvecih talenata,posle one pobede nad Samprasom 2001 u 5.setova na Wimlbiju. Ali posle toga nije imao bas toliko zapazene rezultate i mislili su da ce biti jedan od onih neiskoriscenih talenata,tipa Gaske,ali drugacija stvar se desila.
                      Nadal jeste najveci igrac svih vremena na sljaci,ali samo na sljaci.

                      Federer pazi svoje telo,nije on sreckovic nego zna kad da igra,a kad da pravi pauzu i kad igra zna kako igra u 1.kolu,a kako u finalu. Za razliku od Nadala koji ne zna da dozira,nego mu je svaki mec kao finale[/quote]

                      Ovo si vec zaboravila rec,u prijasnjem postu Da,jeste najveci na sljaci,ali otkud mi znamo da nece biti i opcenito najbolji ::
                      Dobro,mozda on pazi na svoje telo,ali tu i sreca igra neku uloga,covek za 10 godina igranja tenisa nije ni nokat povedio :o
                      Nadala mogu da porede,sa najvecim zato sto sa najvecim ima pozitivan skor,ti si imala 5 iz logike,ja mislim da je ovo sasvim dobra logika.. ;D ;D

                      Comment


                      • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

                        H2H ne znaci nista,i nemoj mi vaditi tu glupu logiku ovde.
                        Blake vodi protiv Nadala,je l' to znaci da je on bolji igrac? ??? ???

                        Da Federer nije tako dobar igrac na sljaci,ne bi dolazio u sva ta finala na sljaci gde ga je Nadal dobijao i onda bi H2H bio drugaciji,mozda 2,3 pobede vise u korist Nadala. Je l' bi to znacilo da je Federer bolji igrac? Ne bi,nego bi bio losiji posto bi gubio od tamo nekih

                        Nije se povredio,znaci 2008 ne postoji,kraj 2005 ne postoji,...vazi,kad ti tako kazes
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • [/quote]

                          Smiri se ;D,nisam mislio ozbiljno,ali ti si pogreno shvatila,ja nisam rekao da je Nadal boji igrac ako ima bolji H2H,kao sto si ti navela primjer u vezi Blaake rekao sam da ga mogu porediti sa najvecim,a to nije isto...
                          H2H,nista ne pokazuje,ali sam morao ;D
                          U vezi cega je vezana zadnja tvoja recenica,nisam je razumjio?

                          Comment


                          • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

                            vezana je da Federer za poslednjih 10 godina nije nokat povredio....

                            2005 je preskocio skoro celu sezonu u dvorani zbog povrede zgloba,bio je bas tesko povredjen,a znas vec sta se desilo prosle godine...
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

                              [quote author=bojanaBG link=topic=1649.msg80699#msg80699 date=1249383117]
                              vezana je da Federer za poslednjih 10 godina nije nokat povredio....

                              2005 je preskocio skoro celu sezonu u dvorani zbog povrede zgloba,bio je bas tesko povredjen,a znas vec sta se desilo prosle godine...
                              [/quote]


                              :o :o :o :o :o :o..Ja sam naprosto shocked,nisam to znao...Eto,kako se to njemu moglo desiti,kada onako cuva svoje telo?? ;D ;D

                              Comment


                              • Re: TADBAS SPAM!!!

                                bas se zakuvalo,vjeciti duel rafa-fed,bojana divan avatar...
                                sigpic
                                Gdje Nato kaze, pa bilo kroz zid, ili u vatru, ili u vulkan, tu Mandusic ide bez pogovora!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X