Naravno da može ako želi. Ovo se samo može desiti u prvom kolu, tako da primjeri Fiksnog o finalu nisu dobri. U ovom slučaju Tomić nije prošao dalje, mora igrati i moj pick ostaje što podržavaju pravila, ne vidim uopšte ništa sporno.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Suicide Tennis - Opsta tema
Collapse
X
-
Jeste samo sto ja nisam vi i ,ostajem pri svom stavu i ne gazim preko sebe zbog 100-injak poena i onog sto je po mojim shvatinjam fer plej,mislim nekom je sltako da nameste sudije i osvoji titulu ima svacega,janisam taj ,a vi kako hocete pozdrav uzdravljeOriginally posted by mark it zer0 View PostFiks, ti si imao legitimno pravo da izaberes koga god hoces od meceva koji nisu poceli. Tako da slobodno mozes da se pridruzis svima nama koji smo danas uz Monteira.
Comment
-
Osnovno pravilo je da mogu da se igraju samo mecevi koji su tog dana po rasporedu, mec LL-Tomic nikad nije bio na rasporedu juce, tako da moze samo zamena da se gleda.
Kome je Kukushkin bio zamena nije imao pravo da menja jer je mec uveliko poceo....
Dakle, sve je po pravilima, vise srece na sledecem turniruhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Juce taj mec nije bio po rasporedu, sta god on bio, LL ili kvalifikanthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Osnovna su pravila kako ih tumačiš, onda izbriši ovo praviloOriginally posted by bojanaBG View PostOsnovno pravilo je da mogu da se igraju samo mecevi koji su tog dana po rasporedu, mec LL-Tomic nikad nije bio na rasporedu juce, tako da moze samo zamena da se gleda.
Kome je Kukushkin bio zamena nije imao pravo da menja jer je mec uveliko poceo....
Dakle, sve je po pravilima, vise srece na sledecem turniru
5. Ako dodje do promene para (kasno odustajanje od turnira, te umesto tog igraca udje LL)
- igrac ima pravo do pocetka meca u kom je doslo do promene protivnika da izabere da li ce mu se racunati prvi pik ili zamena
Ja sam ostao pri svom tipu protiv Tomića, a to što su drugi uveli treći tip je kršenje svih mogućih pravila i to je dozvoljeno. U stvari, najbolje da izbrišeš sva pravila.
Comment
-
A šta da je neko igrao na Tomića, jel opet taj meč ne bi bio juče po rasporedu, pa bi taj neko ispao jer je igrao meč koji je po rasporedu drugog dana?Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostJuce taj mec nije bio po rasporedu, sta god on bio, LL ili kvalifikant
Last edited by mark !t zer0; 21-03-19, 16:36.sloboda ili ništa
Comment
-
-
Ne bi ispao, ispao bi samo ako bi mu zamena izgubila i to se vec desavalo. Neko tipuje mec koji se ne igra tog dana, zamena prodje i ja sam racunala zamenu.Originally posted by mark it zer0 View PostA šta da je neko igrao na Tomića, jel opet taj meč ne bi bio juče po rasporedu, pa bi taj neko ispao jer je igrao meč koji je po rasporedu drugog dana?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Da, to pise u pravilu 3 ili 4. To je u slucaju da niko ne upada umesto tog protivnika (od 2og kola). A sto se tice ovog gore sad sam citao, mora se pokriti u pravilima sve, ne moze da se ostavi tumacenju, jer sa jedne strane ona tvoju tezu ne moze nikako da obori, a sa druge znamo na sta ona misli kada kaze ne racuna se (tacnije zbog cega to kaze). Tako da pravilima treba dopuna, jer je 5. pravilo lose definisano.Originally posted by notorious View PostSkoro su neki prošli na predaju protivnika prije meča?Last edited by colchonero; 21-03-19, 17:03.
Comment
-
I ovo je slučaj kad neko upada i tip ostaje na snazi, može se dogoditi samo u 1 kolu. Svi znamo da je meč prinudno pomjeren za danas, kao što ga i kiša pomjeri, a on ostaje u kosturu od juče. Tome nisam ja kriv i zanima me vodimo li se strogo pravilima ili tumačenjima Bojane?
Imamo i pravilo trećeg tipa, od juče dozvoljeno, cirkus.
Comment
Comment