Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shanghai 2013.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pa djevojcice Role umire za te Olimpiske shvati to vec jednom, dao bi tri Wimbldona i jedan i jedini pisljivi RG za Olimpisko zlato, to mu nedostaje da bi napunio "biblioteku "

    Comment


    • Originally posted by gorstak View Post
      Koliko se ja secam na oba turnira i u muskoj i zenskoj konkurenciji su ucestvovala najbolja rangirana igraca osim "povredjenog" Nadala, ako nije vazno sta su onda tracili vreme po engleskoj travi umesto da se suncaju na Majorki
      Ti mesas 2 stvari, niko nije rekao da OI nisu vazne, samo se tvrdi da su slemovi i zavrsni masters vazniji.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

      sigpic

      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
      with experience.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by gorstak View Post
        Pa djevojcice Role umire za te Olimpiske shvati to vec jednom, dao bi tri Wimbldona i jedan i jedini pisljivi RG za Olimpisko zlato, to mu nedostaje da bi napunio "biblioteku "
        Ma malo je to. Dao bi on i svih 6 WTF turnira i par mastersa.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Prototype View Post
          Ma malo je to. Dao bi on i svih 6 WTF turnira i par mastersa.
          I dva jos Slama, koji ce mu kurac 17.
          sigpic

          Comment


          • ja mislim da bi dao sigurno 2 USO, ima ih 5, a i sigurno jedan AO, koji ce mu 4, puno je
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
              I dva jos Slama, koji ce mu kurac 17.
              Ma naravno, i onaj RG bi on dao da ispuni biblioteku. Jest da onda nebi imao RG u svoju biblioteku, al bi ga ipak dao zbog Olimpijade da popuni biblioteku... vrh vrhova

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Ti mesas 2 stvari, niko nije rekao da OI nisu vazne, samo se tvrdi da su slemovi i zavrsni masters vazniji.
                Mozda su slemovi vazniji a zavrsni masters nikako,i nicim me ne mozes ubediti sve dok postoje grupe i bod sistem, to je samo revija "najboljih" tenisera za tekucu godinu dekorisana bogatim nagradama sponzora pre kraj kalendarske godine vaznosti obicnog masters 1000

                Comment


                • E ali bi onda dao preostale We za RG i ponovo imao punu biblioteku. Mada bi mu onda falio W
                  sigpic

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
                    E ali bi onda dao preostale We za RG i ponovo imao punu biblioteku. Mada bi mu onda falio W
                    I nikako da popuni tu biblioteku

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
                      E ali bi onda dao preostale We za RG i ponovo imao punu biblioteku. Mada bi mu onda falio W
                      onda bi dao koji zavrsni za W
                      i biblioteka je puna
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Ima svega Role ali toga nema, toga nema i nikada ga nece ni imati, jednog dana kada bude Mirki i blizancima prepricavao pored kamina svoje Vikendice negde na Alpama ostace mu knedla u grlu i suza na oku kao onu vimbldonsku

                        Comment


                        • Ne moze to, vec je dao svih sest za OI. Sad mu fale i W i WTF. WTF??? Kako da popuni jebenu biblioteku.
                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • Je l' moze neki masters da menja?
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                              Sutrasnji mec je bas bitan za no.1 na kraju godine, posto Nadal ne igra Pariz, svasta jos moze da se desi.
                              Prvi put cujem.
                              Drugi, relevantniji izvori, kazu drugacije: http://live-tennis.eu/playersSchedule .

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by NI View Post

                                Inace sto se tice Maradone i Zidana tu nista ne zavisi od konteksta. Iako nikada nisam volio Dijega on je najveci fudbaler u istoriji! GOAT!
                                Ovo sad vidim i povuci cu paralelu sa tenisom. Zidan bolji normalno, najbolji fudbaler svih vremena.
                                Zidan i Roger sa jedne, sa druge strane Nadal i Maradona. Poezija, leprsavost, potezi spram brzine i snage i droge(kod Nadala nije dokazano)
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X