Originally posted by prskaj
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Shanghai 2013.
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Niki, uporno tvrdis da se Novak izglupirao pocetkom drugog seta. Ne znam ni ja sta je bilo u pitanju, ali nesto tako nisam video do sada, a verujem ni ostali, te ne znamo sta je, tako da je malo ishitreno i neposteno prema Novaku to nazvati glupiranjem, i jos degutantnim. Ja ne verujem da je izvodjenje onakvih pokreta direktna krivica Novaka, u smislu da je sam pravio greske u tehnici igranja koje su rezultovale onim sto smo videli, takoreci, ne bih nazvao to glupiranjem. Gledajuci nekoliko puta snimak tog gema, i citajuci komentare na nekoliko mesta, primetio sam da su mnogi istakli patike kao uzrok. Znamo da je Novak imao ranije problema s tim (nekontrolisano proklizavanje), ali ovoga puta je bilo malo drugacije. U tim komentarima neki su spomenuli da je su patike mozda davale previse gripa, da mozda nisu uopste nosene, te samim tim uzrokovale prevelik grip i zapinjanje za podlogu (koja u kombinaciji s patikama moze da pogorsa stvar). Sad, znam da se pitas kako zapinjanje moze da uzrokuje takve pokrete, pa ono samo ne moze direktno, ali da se primetiti da su se ti cudni pokreti desavali samo pri udarcima (ili neposredno nakon istih), a pritom je jedan ili cak 2 udarca Novak izveo krecuci se ka mrezi. Pri udarcu, telo je u momentumu, gornji deo tela vrsi rotaciju, takoreci u inerciji je, ako negde u tom procesu noga tj patika naglo zapne za podlogu, ili nakon udarca kad se spusti na obe noge ukoliko se igrac krece, to moze rezultovati naglim cimanjem tela, a to je jos vise izrazeno kad se igrac krece unapred. Eto to je neko moje logicno objasnjenje, sto ne znaci da sam u pravu. Onaj klip tog gema ima u naslovu "extreme fatigue", tj ekstreman umor, ali mislim da je mala sansa da je to, s obzirom na cinjenicu za je posle toga odigrano mnogo vise tenisa nego pre toga.Last edited by Miki90; 14-10-13, 13:09.
Comment
-
Da iskoristim i ja revnost Bokimajsta
Koliko me ono prvo oduševilo (a taj jedan promašaj na mreži je bio kada je lošim slajsom izašao na brejk loptu, šansa u drugom da vrati), toliko me ovo drugo užasava. Prečesto, prečesto ove godine.
Naravno, sve je dobro što se dobro završi.sigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Miki90 View PostNiki, uporno tvrdis da se Novak izglupirao pocetkom drugog seta. Ne znam ni ja sta je bilo u pitanju, ali nesto tako nisam video do sada, a verujem ni ostali, te ne znamo sta je, tako da je malo ishitreno i neposteno prema Novaku to nazvati glupiranjem, i jos degutantnim. Ja ne verujem da je izvodjenje onakvih pokreta direktna krivica Novaka, u smislu da je sam pravio greske u tehnici igranja koje su rezultovale onim sto smo videli, takoreci, ne bih nazvao to glupiranjem. Gledajuci nekoliko puta snimak tog gema, i citajuci komentare na nekoliko mesta, primetio sam da su mnogi istakli patike kao uzrok. Znamo da je Novak imao ranije problema s tim (nekontrolisano proklizavanje), ali ovoga puta je bilo malo drugacije. U tim komentarima neki su spomenuli da je su patike mozda davale previse gripa, da mozda nisu uopste nosene, te samim tim uzrokovale prevelik grip i zapinjanje za podlogu (koja u kombinaciji s patikama moze da pogorsa stvar). Sad, znam da se pitas kako zapinjanje moze da uzrokuje takve pokrete, pa ono samo ne moze direktno, ali da se primetiti da su se ti cudni pokreti desavali samo pri udarcima (ili neposredno nakon istih), a pritom je jedan ili cak 2 udarca Novak izveo krecuci se ka mrezi. Pri udarcu, telo je u momentumu, gornji deo tela vrsi rotaciju, takoreci u inerciji je, ako negde u tom procesu noga tj patika naglo zapne za podlogu, ili nakon udarca kad se spusti na obe noge ukoliko se igrac krece, to moze rezultovati naglim cimanjem tela, a to je jos vise izrazeno kad se igrac krece unapred. Eto to je neko moje logicno objasnjenje, sto ne znaci da sam u pravu. Onaj klip tog gema ima u naslovu "extreme fatigue", tj ekstreman umor, ali mislim da je mala sansa da je to, s obzirom na cinjenicu za je posle toga odigrano mnogo vise tenisa nego pre toga.
Comment
-
evo, pa da analiziramo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Prototype View PostNema se sta analizirat, umor ga stigo. Grcevi ga sjebali, vidi se da je jedva udarao lopticu
nema sansehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by miloolja View Posthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FC Nadal View PostKakav umor,ako nije otkazivanje perfiernog nervnog sistema,ne moze nista biti osim cisto foliranje i opravdanje za greske
Comment
Comment