Originally posted by shminka
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Davis Cup
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by NI View PostKoju kartu bojana?
1.
Da bi hard odgovarao Svicarcima zato igraju kompetitvne meceve neposredno prije DC-a?
2.
Da sljaka ne odgovara Svicarcima zato sto nece imati vremena da se prilagode?
Klement kaze prvu a ti drugu.
ali ono sto je presudno je sta vise odgovara Francuzima, a niko ne moze da me ubedi da Conga vise voli indoor clay nego indoor hard, a to vazi i za celu njihovu reprezentaciju, osim mozda za Gaskeahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post1. i 2. su iste stvari samo recene na 2 razlicita nacina
ali ono sto je presudno je sta vise odgovara Francuzima, a niko ne moze da me ubedi da Conga vise voli indoor clay nego indoor hard, a to vazi i za celu njihovu reprezentaciju, osim mozda za Gaskea
Nikada u sportu nije vazno koliko si jak, nego koliko si relativno jak tj da li si jaci od protivnika. Conga i Monfis sigurno vise vole indoor brzi hard nego sljaku. Mislim da je za Simona i Gaskea upravo obrnuto.
Federer sigurno vise voli brzi hard nego sljaku, a Vavrinka sigurno vise voli sljaku.
Originally posted by shminka View PostNije, lakše bi Simon i Riša na tvrdoj do bodova nego na šljaci...ovako su i Juliena zijanili...vidjet ćemo, uostalom, kako će se provesti već prvog danaLast edited by NI; 24-09-14, 10:42.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostNisu 1. i 2. iste stvari. Slicne su. Klement je vjerovatno bio neiskren. Prije ce biti da se on zapravo slaze sa tobom. A moguce, da je po srijedi i nesto drugo.
Nikada u sportu nije vazno koliko si jak, nego koliko si relativno jak tj da li si jaci od protivnika. Conga i Monfis sigurno vise vole indoor brzi hard nego sljaku. Mislim da je za Simona i Gaskea upravo obrnuto.
Federer sigurno vise voli brzi hard nego sljaku, a Vavrinak sigurno vise voli sljaku.
Cekaj bre NI, imas Federera kojeg je tesko dobiti na bilo kojoj podlozi i imas Stana koji vise voli sporije podloge, sa druge strane imas Congu i Monfilsa koji vole brze teren, imas Simona koji realno vise voli beton nego sljaku i oni su izabrali sljaku, i tebi je to ok?
Steta sto nismo stavili neku anketu pre izbora podloge, bas me zanima koilko bi ljudi glasalo za sljaku...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Bojana,
Ne vidis razliku. Tu nema pomoci. Nije ni bitno previse.
Podcjenjujes Simona na sljaci. Nisi jedina. Simon je defakto jednako dobar na sljaci kao i ne hardu. U zadnje je vrijeme dotjerao i Federera i Vavrinku do 5. seta u RG i bio totalno izjednacen sa Nadalom u Rimu.
Comment
-
Podsenjujes i ti Stana i Feda na sljaci, a precenjujes Francuze...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
http://prntscr.com/4ptg0h
http://prntscr.com/4ptggq
Stan no.4 na sljaci, no.35 na indoor
msm da je jasno kao dan da je ovo glupa odluka Francuza i da su izborom sljake sebi smanjili sanse
Comment
-
Feli,
Igrano je malo meceva da bi statistika na Indoor hardu bila bitna. Nije valjda da stvarno vjerujes da je Gaske bolji od Federera na 'indoor hardu' kako statistika pokazuje.
Gledajuci rezultate tokom karijere, Federer i Conga su jasno bolji na hardu nego na sljaci. Wawrinka je jasno bolji na sljaci nego na hardu. Simon i Monfis su nesto bolji na hardu a Gaske je jednak. I to je otprilke tacno.
Na hardu je redosljed:
Code:1. Federer 82.7% 2. Conga 69.3% 3. Monfis 64.1% 4. Gaske 62.5% 5. Stan 60.8% 6. Simon 60%
Code:1. Federer 76.4% 2. Stan 65.5% 3. Conga 64.8% 4. Gaske 62.2% 5. Monfis 62.1% 6. Simon 58.4%
Ako pogledas samo ovogodisnju statistiku, ona je na sljaci puno povoljnija za Francuze. Ali to je mali uzorak, pa je manje pouzdana.
Osim faktora da Svicarci trebaju da predju sa harda na sljaku u 5 dana, postoji i drugi faktor. Ako Francuzi noce do maksimziiraju svoje sanse da osvoje jednu ili dvije pobjede onda treba da se igra na hardu. Ako pak hoce da makimiziraju svoje sanse da dobiju 3:2 onda nije izvjesno da sto im je pametnije.
Originally posted by ClayWarrior View PostBez filozofiranja nistaLast edited by NI; 24-09-14, 13:16.
Comment
-
Svajcarci su u ovom trenutku favoriti protiv Francuza na svim podlogama. Mozda ne bas (pre)veliki favoriti, ali ipak su favoriti...
Nekako sama logika kaze da u situacijama kada si autsajder biras opciju koja ce oslabiti protivnika. A (realno govoreci) svi francuski igraci su tradicionalno klasicni all-round igraci koji su u stanju da igraju odlicno na svim podlogama, tako da oni nece mnogo izgubiti igranjem na sljaci. Tsonga je bukvalno razbio Federera na Roland Garros-u prosle godine, mnogo lakse nego sto bi to uradio na tvrdoj podlozi. To je zapravo i najubjedljivija pobjeda Tsonge u medjusobnim duelima sa Federerom.
U svakom slucaju, ja cu navijati za Francusku u ovom finalu.
Comment
-
Nikada u sportu nije vazno koliko si jak, nego koliko si relativno jak tj da li si jaci od protivnika. Conga i Monfis sigurno vise vole indoor brzi hard nego sljaku. Mislim da je za Simona i Gaskea upravo obrnuto.
Federer sigurno vise voli brzi hard nego sljaku, a Vavrinka sigurno vise voli sljaku.
Ova citat gore je za mene sustina svega. Sveukupno Francuzi mogu vise profitirati od sljake nego Svajcarci. Znaci nije samo koliko su oni jaci, nego koliko je protivnik (citaj Federer) slabiji. To je mec sa dve ostrice, videcemo kako ce izgledati u tom trenutku.
Comment
-
-
Izgleda da se USO i ona 2 mastersa nisu desila ili su igrani na sljaci
Conga ga dobio na HCu, Monfils imao 2 mec lopte na HCu, ali je sljaka pravi izborhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment