Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nole, idi u peršun!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prvo da vidimo žreb. Fizički postaje naporno. Nema ni Novak baš snage ko pre 10 godina. Ima dosta ali nema previše. Dobro je imati malo slabiji žreb. Lepa vest je da Rafa ne igra. Mentalno to donosi olakšanje.

    ​​​​​​Korak po korak. Navikao je na teške žrebove. Nema opuštanja.

    Comment


    • Ogroman post napisan pre ovog "popravljanja" foruma mi nestao

      Ali sa pogresmima se kace
      Ne mogu oni da popravljaju i brisu, koliko ja mogu da pisem, makar i kasnije

      Za pocetak stosta propusteno ovih dana


      sigpic

      Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
      But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

      Comment


      • Gde su analize velike pobede u finalu?
        Last edited by Weltschmerz; 17-06-21, 18:22.

        Comment


        • Ja sam gledao opet polufinale. To je za analizu, finale nije.

          Novak nije pobedio Rafu samo na fizičku spremnost. On ima sve udarce koji su potrebni da mi se pobedio Rafa na Rolan Garosu.

          Sada kada je pobedio konačno i ponovo, biće sledeći put još lakše. Nadal ako misli da ga pobedi opet moraće da počne ambicioznije po paraleli, i to sa oba krila.

          ​​​​​​Nadal taktički može da napravi izmene u igri u odnosu na ovaj poraz i moraće malo da bolje tempira fizičku spremnost. Novak je trenutno u mentalnoj i fizičkoj formi mnogo ispred njega. Što se da videti po turnirima od početka ove godine.

          Nadam se da će još neki put igrati jedan protiv drugog na nekoj podlozi koja nije šljaka.

          Što se tiče omladine, njih je odučio od tenisa. Zvereva povređen, Thiem je trenutno u odsustvu, Medvedev rešen u Australiji a Stefanos sa hendikepom.

          Oni misle da se približavaju a u stvari se udaljavaju od Novaka barem. Kada se pogledaju Slemovi, momci sporo napreduju.

          Comment


          • Gledao sam Viskov i Govedaricin podkast gde oni sugerisu da je Tsitspas pre pocetka meca znao da mu je baba umrla.Inace, Tsitsipas je objavio tek uvece na dan finala da mu je baba umrla 5 minuta pre pocetka meca.Da li neko zna nesto detaljnije o ovome?

            Comment


            • Meni Cipiripis deluje kao jedan veliki folirant.. isto kao i Rolex Fedex.

              Pridruzio se bio hajci na Novaka da je lazirao da je povredjen na raznim turnirima, tako da me ne bi cudilo i da je koristio babinu smrt, mada je to onda stvarno heavy.

              Comment





              • Comment


                • Meni prica deluje nelogicno.Ako je znao da mu je baba umrla, verovatno bi trofej posvetio njoj, bez obzira sto nije titula, ipak je osvojio trofej (tacnu).Mnogo verovatnije mi deluje da su pricu pustili, kada je vec izgubio mec.I visko nije mogao da se nacudi kako je moguce da nema traga na njemu, a saznao je za smrt babe.

                  Comment


                  • On nije nikad rekao da je znao da mu je baba umrla pre pocetka meca, to je pogresno protumaceno. To je saznao tek posle meca, zato je posle napisao onaj post na IG.
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • A sta kazete na Rolexovu izjavu da se previse obraca paznja na GS, a da se i ostali turniri igraju?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by mmajstor View Post
                        A sta kazete na Rolexovu izjavu da se previse obraca paznja na GS, a da se i ostali turniri igraju?
                        Ni to nije tacna izjava, ali treba se potruditi i traziti izvor, mnogo je lakse citati samo portale koji izvuku jednu recenicu iz konteksta i to prenesu kao vest
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                        sigpic

                        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                        with experience.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post

                          Ni to nije tacna izjava, ali treba se potruditi i traziti izvor, mnogo je lakse citati samo portale koji izvuku jednu recenicu iz konteksta i to prenesu kao vest
                          kako glasi tacna izjava?

                          Comment


                          • Q: The 3 of you have won practically every grand slam lately. When you hear the numbers 19, 20, 20 what thoughts come to your mind? Does this record still matter to you or you don’t care?

                            RF: I think that as long as the three of us still play, everything is possible and we’ll see at the end what happens. But it’s spectacular that we have so many grand slams simultaneously whereas the others have so little. Earlier there used to be more players with 2, 4, 6, 8 GS. They were more spread. Now the 3 of us have won so many. I believe that many more different players will win slams in the future and I hope that the present situation changes because it shouldn’t be written and spoken only about GS. Otherwise we come to the old saying: what am I doing here (in Halle) at all? I play more ATP tournaments on the tour than GS. I know that the GS have given me a lot and I’m incredibly grateful. They are the big stage, I get it. But when I’ve been on the tour it hasn’t only been about GS. It was Sampras who started this “I care only about the GS”. After he said that everything changed. At some point I set this goal that it would be nice if I equalized or broke Pete’s record. So for me everything else above this number was a bonus. For Rafa it was different and for Novak it was different. I put the bar even higher and thus the two of them set much different goals than I did. My goal was never to win 14. Then all of a sudden I got close and I thought once the record is broken, it’s broken and it doesn’t matter if I win 15, 16 or 17. That’s why it was a completely different situation but it’s fantastic to see how many times Rafa can win Paris, Novak Australia or I Wimbledon. It’s nice that we could win so many slams side by side and it shows how many highlights our tour has.
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • Izjava nema smisla ako je tačna. Posebno onaj deo gde je njemu samo bilo bitno da pređe Samprasovih 14GS a posle toga svejedno. A ovamo sve čudi što Novak želi da prestige njegov i Rafin rekord sa 20GS?!

                              Comment


                              • Lepo je rekao: At some point I set this goal that it would be nice if I equalized or broke Pete’s record. So for me everything else above this number was a bonus. For Rafa it was different and for Novak it was different.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X