Ha,ha,ha...dobra si. Kada ostanes bez argumenta tu je dobar stari spin. Tezinski i vremenski je isto AUS-RG-WB-US i RG-WB-US + AUS. Razlika je samo sto se ono zove kalendarska godina a ovo drugo 12 meseci. To je forma, sustinski je isto.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nole, idi u peršun!
Collapse
X
-
Nije sustinski isto, ovo je nova sezona, mentalno se drugacije priprema i sprema i igraci ipak dolaze skroz svezi i zdravi na AUS, za razliku od USO gde je to vec uveliko druga polovina sezone, bez nekih vecih pauza, mentalno je to mnogo teze.
Nema nikakvog spina...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Jednostavno nije isto, sta sve imas izmedju AUS i RG, a sta sve imas USO i AUS, plus sto je ovde kraj sezone i jos jednom ponavljam, drugaciji su igraci na AUS, mentalno su sveziji u odnosu na USOhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
U cemu je ralizka izmedju tvog isto je i mog nije isto?
Kako je moje spin, a tvoje je argumentovana rasprava?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Iskreno nevezano za ovu diskusiju, ja imam osecaj da se u blizoj buducnosti (10-15 godina) da se pojavi neko ko ce da osvoji sva 4 slema u istoj godini ili da veze 5 ili 6 slemva.
Pogloge su ujednacene, i jedini razlog sto se to nije desilo do sada je zbog Nadala na sljaci. Ima i Novak ove godine sansu, ali morao bi bas da bude na maksimumu u Francuskoj.
Comment
-
Vrlo prosto. Ja kazem da je tezinski i vremenski isto AUS-RG-WB-US i RG-WB-US + AUS. Razlika je samo sto se ono zove kalendarska godina a ovo drugo 12 meseci. Ti mislis drugacije. Daj cinjenice a ne "jednostavno nije tako". Demantuj me cinjenicama.
Comment
-
Originally posted by skeptik View PostVrlo prosto. Ja kazem da je tezinski i vremenski isto AUS-RG-WB-US i RG-WB-US + AUS. Razlika je samo sto se ono zove kalendarska godina a ovo drugo 12 meseci. Ti mislis drugacije. Daj cinjenice a ne "jednostavno nije tako". Demantuj me cinjenicama.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Po meni nema veze sto je vremenska odrednica ista, kalendarska godina je kalendarska godina, tako se neke stvari odredjuju i klasifikuju, a sto kaze cssr Nole Slem je najlepse [emoji41]sigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by skeptik View PostTo nisu cinjenice nego tvoje subjektivno misljenje. Na osnovu kojih cinjenica si dosla do tog zakljucka samo nemoj opet "jednostavno to je tako"?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
i posle ja spinujemhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 147 View PostIskreno nevezano za ovu diskusiju, ja imam osecaj da se u blizoj buducnosti (10-15 godina) da se pojavi neko ko ce da osvoji sva 4 slema u istoj godini ili da veze 5 ili 6 slemva.
Pogloge su ujednacene, i jedini razlog sto se to nije desilo do sada je zbog Nadala na sljaci. Ima i Novak ove godine sansu, ali morao bi bas da bude na maksimumu u Francuskoj.
Comment
Comment