Originally posted by NEMANJA97
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nole, idi u peršun!
Collapse
X
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostOd 3 slema koje Roger osvojio, na sva 3 je Djokovic igrao
Bojana i ja baš lepo diskutujemo, ja ne mrzim ni Federera odličan je, ali ova dvojica su mi... Bruka. Svakako su mi njih trojica ne mogu reći omiljeni, ali da moram da biram koga bih gledao od svih ikada, to su ova trojica.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uroš View PostOn je u tom trenutku bio samo fizički prisutan. Zna se kad on igra a kada ne. Nebitno, to niko neće uzeti kao argument, jer je on gubio od koga je stigao.
Bojana i ja baš lepo diskutujemo, ja ne mrzim ni Federera odličan je, ali ova dvojica su mi... Bruka. Svakako su mi njih trojica ne mogu reći omiljeni, ali da moram da biram koga bih gledao od svih ikada, to su ova trojica.
Pa valjda to sto je teniser fizicki i mentalno spremniji u odnosu na konkurenciju treba da bude plus, a ne da mu se uzima za minus to sto je konkurencija bila povredjena ili mentalno odsutnahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
e sad ti vidi, da li je plus to sto se Federer ganja sa vec 3. ili 4. generacijom tenisera ili je to minus?
I koliko laksi put imaju Nadal i Djokovic sto u generaciji koja 5,6 godina nema nijednog igraca koji je blizu Marejevih kvaliteta, a da ne pricam nesto vise
S tim sto postoji jedna ozbiljna razlika. Federer je slabo polje na atp tour-u doziveo u svojim najboljim godima(22-25) a Djokovic i Nadal ce slabo polje doziveti tek u tridesetima a opet ce tu biti i Nadal(Djokovicu) kao i Djokovic(Nadalu).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chiwwi View PostIsto koliko je i Federer imao laksi put od svoje 22 do 25 kad je za svoje glavne konkurente na slemovima imao Filipusisa, Bagdatisa, Rodika i Safina za razliku od Djokovica i Nadala koji su morali preko Federera i Nadala(Djokovic) i Federera i Djokovica(Nadal).
S tim sto postoji jedna ozbiljna razlika. Federer je slabo polje na atp tour-u doziveo u svojim najboljim godima(22-25) a Djokovic i Nadal ce slabo polje doziveti tek u tridesetima a opet ce tu biti i Nadal(Djokovicu) kao i Djokovic(Nadalu).
Ja ne pricam o istoj generaciji, ja pricam o generaciji koja dolazi, a koja je preskocila, to je generacija Dimitrova, Raonica, Tomica itd.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Osvojiti bilo koji GS u bilo kakvoj eri je djavolski težak posao.Svaki osvojeni je izuzetan napor.Vidjeli smo ove godine protiv kakvih igrača je Nole osvojio,rekla bih da se nije bas prošetao.
I ne bih se bas gadjala GS-ovima,vidjeli smo šta se desilo 2016.
Korak po korak.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostRodik i Safin su njegova generacija, to nije isto i ne moze da se poredi.
Ja ne pricam o istoj generaciji, ja pricam o generaciji koja dolazi, a koja je preskocila, to je generacija Dimitrova, Raonica, Tomica itd.Last edited by Chiwwi; 13-09-18, 21:48.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostPo toj logici, Djokovic je uzeo RG tek kad je Nadal pao, dobio ga je 2015. kad je Nadal bio ocajan, a osvojio je 2016. kad je Nadal odustao tokom turnira.
Pa valjda to sto je teniser fizicki i mentalno spremniji u odnosu na konkurenciju treba da bude plus, a ne da mu se uzima za minus to sto je konkurencija bila povredjena ili mentalno odsutna
Rogeru naravno idu čestitke za 3 slema koja je uzeo ali on je vec izjavio da mu je savrseno jasno sta se dogadja kad je Novak tu. Naravno on je miljenik planete pa su malo preterali sa tolikim hvalisanjem. Covek u prvom duelu sa Novakom nije imao brejk loptu...
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostJa se ne radujem, samo odgovaram Urosu jer je on rekao da je Federer uzeo ta 3 slema kad Djokovic nije bio tu, sto jednostavno nije istina.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ljubitelj tenisa View PostTo ti mislis da je Rafa bio ocajan 2015. Novak je tad bio prejak. Da nisu igrali u 1/4 finalu igrali bi u finalu. Ne vidim ko bi pobedio Rafu do finala. Sa druge strane Nadalova predaja 2016te je najkriminalniji dogadjaj u tenisu te godine koji nikad nece biti otkriven. Pokidao je sljaku i samo odjednom predao.
Rogeru naravno idu čestitke za 3 slema koja je uzeo ali on je vec izjavio da mu je savrseno jasno sta se dogadja kad je Novak tu. Naravno on je miljenik planete pa su malo preterali sa tolikim hvalisanjem. Covek u prvom duelu sa Novakom nije imao brejk loptu...
On u proseku ima 1 poraz na sljaci godisnje, te godine je imao 6 i ti kazes da nije bio ocajan.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostPo toj logici, Djokovic je uzeo RG tek kad je Nadal pao, dobio ga je 2015. kad je Nadal bio ocajan, a osvojio je 2016. kad je Nadal odustao tokom turnira.
Pa valjda to sto je teniser fizicki i mentalno spremniji u odnosu na konkurenciju treba da bude plus, a ne da mu se uzima za minus to sto je konkurencija bila povredjena ili mentalno odsutna
Comment
-
Originally posted by torpedo View PostKad ste se već raspisali ovde, Bojana šta misliš koliko će RF osvojiti GS do kraja karijere.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment