Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nole, idi u peršun!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by pecaros View Post
    Javna je tajna da u odnosu na broj igrača njih sasvim mali procenat odlično ili fenomenalno zarađuje.
    Većina praktično jedva preživljava, snalaze se kako god znaju i umeju.
    Svi to znaju ali niko ništa konkretno nije preduzeo.
    Pre svega iz ljudskih i kolegijalnih razloga Novak je pokrenuo inicijativu koju su britanski mediji dočekali već videsmo kako. Da je inicijativu pokrenuo neko drugi njima draži već bi se predlagač uzdizao u nebesa ali pošto je to Novak onda ga valja još malo provući po blatu.
    Neka im, neka i dalje žvrljaju gluposti za jednako glupe konzumente tog đubreta, vratiće im se to novom turom novakovanja.
    Apsolutno netacno, Roger je bio predsednik ne znam ni ja koliko godina i zalagao se i na kraju i uspeo (normalno sa svim ostalim igracima) da izdvesvuje povecanje nagrada za ispadanje na pocetku slemova.
    Pa se onda doslo u situaciju da je dosta tih journeyman dolazilo na slemove, polupovredjeni, samo da uzmu cek, a predaju u 1.kolu.

    Hocu da kazem da Djokoviceva inicijativa nije nikako nova, nego je vec aktuelna 6,7 godina i to minimum.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Federer je diplomata, politicar, ne moze tako nista da se izdejstvuje. Mora na buku, prijetnje, bojkot, zna se sta se desava u NBA godinama, pa kad krene strajk onda mora da se popusti.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
        Federer je diplomata, politicar, ne moze tako nista da se izdejstvuje. Mora na buku, prijetnje, bojkot, zna se sta se desava u NBA godinama, pa kad krene strajk onda mora da se popusti.
        Pa uspeo je, povecali su fond za igrace koji ispadnu u 1.kolu slema, zato su sad morali da uvedu pravilo za kaznjavanje, jer je previse njih to zloupotrebljavalo.
        Kao prosle godine na W, gledaoci na CC su videli 2 seta jer su Klizan i Dolgo predali, bili povredjeni i ranije, dosli samo po cek.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
          Apsolutno netacno, Roger je bio predsednik ne znam ni ja koliko godina i zalagao se i na kraju i uspeo (normalno sa svim ostalim igracima) da izdvesvuje povecanje nagrada za ispadanje na pocetku slemova.
          Pa se onda doslo u situaciju da je dosta tih journeyman dolazilo na slemove, polupovredjeni, samo da uzmu cek, a predaju u 1.kolu.

          Hocu da kazem da Djokoviceva inicijativa nije nikako nova, nego je vec aktuelna 6,7 godina i to minimum.
          Vidim, bas mu islo od ruke ....
          sigpic

          Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

          U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
          Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Sandugp View Post
            Vidim, bas mu islo od ruke ....
            Pa pogledaj kakve su nagrade bile ranije i kakve su sad, opste je poznato da kvalifikanti i oni koji izgube u 1.kolu dobijaju vece pare nego ranije.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
              Apsolutno netacno, Roger je bio predsednik ne znam ni ja koliko godina i zalagao se i na kraju i uspeo (normalno sa svim ostalim igracima) da izdvesvuje povecanje nagrada za ispadanje na pocetku slemova.
              Pa se onda doslo u situaciju da je dosta tih journeyman dolazilo na slemove, polupovredjeni, samo da uzmu cek, a predaju u 1.kolu.

              Hocu da kazem da Djokoviceva inicijativa nije nikako nova, nego je vec aktuelna 6,7 godina i to minimum.
              Da, odlično, ma šta odlično, sjajno, fenomenalno se Rodžer izborio toliko sjajno da to neko drugi treba popravljati.
              Last edited by pecaros; 16-01-18, 12:56.
              sigpic

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pecaros View Post
                Da, odlično, ma šta odlično, sjajno, fenomenalno se Rodžer izborio toliko sjajno da to neko drugi treba popravljati.
                Pa uvek moze bolje, samo je netacno da niko nije nista radio i uradio dok se sad nije Djokovic pojavio.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Niko nije ni rekao da nista nije uradio .... samo ocigledno je da nije uradio dovoljno.
                  sigpic

                  Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

                  U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
                  Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

                  Comment


                  • Kao sto rekoh, uvek moze bolje, sigurno ne trebaju novi predstavnici da sede skrstenih ruku, ali je netacno da se nije radilo i dosta uradilo.
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                      Pa uvek moze bolje, samo je netacno da niko nije nista radio i uradio dok se sad nije Djokovic pojavio.
                      OK, priznajem grešku jer kako sam mogao i pomisliti da iza svakog humanog gesta u tenisu ne stoji Rodžer.
                      Inicijativa je dakle izvorno Rodžerova koji se eto trudio i borio protiv establišmenta nekom vrstom tihog rata.
                      Novak je naravno ne pitavši za autorska prava inicijativu besramno prisvojio i to je verovatno razlog ovog stavljanja na stub srama i proglašenja halapljivim.
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • Ovako što se tiče meča sa Jangom vrlo sam oduševljen
                        Imam neke sitnice kao zamerke, ali za ovaj meč je ovo sve bile više nego dovoljno. Zamerke:
                        -opuštenje pred kraj drugog seta i tad se desio jedini Jangov brejk
                        -slabiji procenat ubačenog prvog servisa
                        -mnogo neiskorišćenih brejk lopti
                        Što se tiče ostalih dešavanja i ovih gluposti od Britanaca to uopšte nije iznenađenje. Tako se ponašaju prema Noletu sve vreme i samo lažu i izvrću. Žao mi je što je morao dobiti onako sramna pitanja na konferencija. Takvim ljudima nije tu mesto , to nisu novinari nego skandal majstori. Da je to sve pričao Endi onda bi ti isti to veličali na sva zvona. Nije mi jasno čemu ovde prepirka oko Federera pa ok on je učinio neke stvari pre Noleta i sad se Nole trudi da poboljša ove probleme. Pa bar u ovom problemu nema suprotnih strana

                        Comment


                        • @pecaros
                          Previse si ogorcen, nije ti to dobro.
                          Fed se kao predsednik igraca borio za bolja prava i sigurno nije bio prvi, nego je nasledio nekog (mislim da je Blake bio, a bio je i Ljubicic), kao sto je sad Djokovic nasledio Feda i kao sto ce neki XY naslediti Djokovica. A kad taj pokrene pitanja nagrada, da li ce on krenuti od 0 ili ce vec imati sve sto su njegovi prethodnici uradili?

                          A to sto su novinari izvrnuli, to je druga prica, tu nisam nista ni rekla. Ali to je daily fail, od njih se tako nesto i ocekuje.
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                            @pecaros
                            Previse si ogorcen, nije ti to dobro.
                            Fed se kao predsednik igraca borio za bolja prava i sigurno nije bio prvi, nego je nasledio nekog (mislim da je Blake bio, a bio je i Ljubicic), kao sto je sad Djokovic nasledio Feda i kao sto ce neki XY naslediti Djokovica. A kad taj pokrene pitanja nagrada, da li ce on krenuti od 0 ili ce vec imati sve sto su njegovi prethodnici uradili?

                            A to sto su novinari izvrnuli, to je druga prica, tu nisam nista ni rekla. Ali to je daily fail, od njih se tako nesto i ocekuje.
                            ovdje nije sporno ko je prvi dao predlog...predlog je dobar i kao takav treba da se shvati i prihvati,zar niji cilj svakome da se bori za sto bolji polozaj tenisera...Problem je taj sto recimo da su Roger,Andy i da ne nabrajam dalje dali ovaj predlog,u toku AO ne bi se digla ovolika prasina i dobili bi maksimalno 1 do 2 pitanja na pres konferenciji o tome,dok evo vidis i sama Novaku su 3 pitnja bila o njegovoj igri danas,cak ga nisu ni pitali u kakvom je stanju lakat,vec su sva pitanja bila na gore spomenutu stvar
                            Temeritas est damnere quod nescials!

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Power*Mix* View Post
                              ovdje nije sporno ko je prvi dao predlog...predlog je dobar i kao takav treba da se shvati i prihvati,zar niji cilj svakome da se bori za sto bolji polozaj tenisera...Problem je taj sto recimo da su Roger,Andy i da ne nabrajam dalje dali ovaj predlog,u toku AO ne bi se digla ovolika prasina i dobili bi maksimalno 1 do 2 pitanja na pres konferenciji o tome,dok evo vidis i sama Novaku su 3 pitnja bila o njegovoj igri danas,cak ga nisu ni pitali u kakvom je stanju lakat,vec su sva pitanja bila na gore spomenutu stvar
                              Da, vidim da Feda na engleskom nisu ni pitali, ali su ga pitali Svajcarci, nije hteo puno da komentarise

                              #Federer says in Swiss German that it's good the players got together and talked about a union & money. It's important, but the details should stay among the players and he did not want to talk about his specific thoughts.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Normalno da nije hteo puno da komentariše jer ne bi ni Nole o tome govorio da nisu Britanci napisali one gluposti. I još ovo što su mu uradili na konferenciji to je ogromna sramota. Svako bi morao protiv takvih da ga podrži!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X