Varaš NI, varaš Kao više pozitiivnog ima kada ja na prvu loptu kada pogledam koliko ima ovog bold negativnog sa sve očajnim dođe mnogo više valjda nego pozoitivnog bold?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nole, idi u peršun!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Chiwwi View PostSad je drugacije. Nije vise najbolji. To je sada Nadal
Comment
-
Originally posted by miloolja View PostVaraš NI, varaš Kao više pozitiivnog ima kada ja na prvu loptu kada pogledam koliko ima ovog bold negativnog sa sve očajnim dođe mnogo više valjda nego pozoitivnog bold?
Pozitivno ima vecu tezinu. Ono sto je igrao 7 gemova u korist svoj stete tj. inateci se Ramosu, vremenu i Agasiju ima terepeutsku vrijednost.
Definitivno vise pozitivnog.Last edited by NI; 02-06-17, 20:11.
Comment
-
Agasi nije ni trebao da bude tu, NI propade ti teorija
Novak: Andre was not supposed to be here today, he managed to reschedule certain things to come and I appreciate that. #RG17http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostAgasi nije ni trebao da bude tu, NI propade ti teorija
------------------
Olja,
Ovo je ozbiljno pitanje, iako moze izgledati suprtno.
Da li zanas zasto paun ima prekrasni ogromni rep, jelen velike rogove itd?
Comment
-
Ček, ček, ipak sam sada ušla, ako ne računam dva kratka izleta za vreme meča, ništa nisam skoro čitala, tako da prvo prelistam....sigpic
Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.
Comment
-
Svaka čast NI.
Dodala bih još da mi se čini da je Novak u par momenata igrao u grču i u panici , kao i to da je ( bez obzira što ju je dosta i mašio ) dosta igrao i BH paralelu.
Imala sam utisak da je potcenio protivnika, da je u ovom meču želeo da uvežbava udarce, i da ima jači trening.
Onda je krenuo vetar, Novak je dosta izbacivao u aut, Švarcman je igrao taktički perfektno.
Ritern je bio vrlo klimav , a na momente odličan...
Počeo je da se nervira, onda i ona sudijska opomena
A onda inat
Sve u svemu, meni se čini da je ovo neki Rimski nivo, bar sa početka...
U svakom slučaju puno prostora za nadogradnju i napredak.
Šampion kakav je Novak ne sme da dozvoli katastrofalnu realizaciju brejk lopti...a to se desilo danas.
Novak o Agasiju , kao što sam i rekla, najverovatije će biti samo na najvećim turnirima...
Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.AliKo sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred."When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."
Comment
-
hahahaha
NI, ti si nepopravljivi optimista, samo se krijes iza analizahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View Posthahahaha
NI, ti si nepopravljivi optimista, samo se krijes iza analiza
Nadam se da se ne ljutis na izliv familijarnosti.
Ja vam uporno tvrdim da sam pesimista ali mi ne vjerujete. Ipak, vise sam realista nego pesimista. S vremenom sam naucio da pesimizam paralizira a realizam pobjedjuje.
Novak je morao uvjeravati Agasija da promijeni raspored i ostane malo duze. I uspio je. I onda Agasi ode da daje intervju, a siguran sam da je dobio bonus na kraju meca. Da sam ja Novak i da mi je to ucinio, poslao bih ga u 7 materinih. Ali Novak je pametniji, ikao je tesko vario tu knedlu koju je morao da proguta.Last edited by NI; 02-06-17, 20:28.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostBojance,
Nadam se da se ne ljutis na izliv familijarnosti.
Ja vam uporno tvrdim da sam pesimista ali mi ne vjerujete. Ipak, vise sam realista nego pesimista. S vremenom sam naucio da realizam pobjedjuje.
Novak je morao uvjeravati Agasija da promijeni raspored i ostane malo duze. I uspio je. I onda Agasi ode da daje intervju, a siguran sam da je dobio bonus na kraju meca. Da sam ja Novak i da mi je to ucinio, poslao bih ga u 7 materinih. Ali Novak je pametniji, ikao je tesko vario tu knedlu koju je morao da proguta.
A sto se tice Agasija, ipak vise verujem Djokovicevoj izjavi nego tvojoj konstrukcijihttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by notorious View PostA zašto 3 ne bi bilo više od 6? Jesu li 3GS titule više od 6 ostalih turnira, tako je i NI izvukao pozitivu, mada je i 0 pozitivna.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by notorious View PostA zašto 3 ne bi bilo više od 6? Jesu li 3GS titule više od 6 ostalih turnira, tako je i NI izvukao pozitivu, mada je i 0 pozitivna.
Zato sto su bitne stvari pozitivne. U svkom trenutku kad je bio sabran, dominirao je Svarcmana. Plus je izbacio negativnu energiju iz sebe. I to je vaznije nego cinjenica da je pokazao da ga sintnice mogu ubaciti u totalnu apatiju pa i samodestrukciju kao oni dropovi na kraju prvog seta.
Comment
Comment