Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nole, idi u peršun!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Varaš NI, varaš Kao više pozitiivnog ima kada ja na prvu loptu kada pogledam koliko ima ovog bold negativnog sa sve očajnim dođe mnogo više valjda nego pozoitivnog bold?
    sigpic

    Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
    But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

    Comment


    • ukrocen bik sa pampasa po broju dobijenih meceva u bulonjskoj sumi


      French Open match wins:

      75 Nadal
      65 Federer
      58 Vilas & Djokovic
      53 Lendl
      51 Agassi
      49 Borg

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Chiwwi View Post
        Sad je drugacije. Nije vise najbolji. To je sada Nadal
        Nisam ni rekla da je najbolji, samo da je ovakvih ocajnih meceva Novak imao dosta u karijeri, a kako ce igrati dalje na turniru - ko zna. Mozda odigra perfektan mec a moze i gore od ovoga. Sve opcije su trenutno moguce.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by miloolja View Post
          Varaš NI, varaš Kao više pozitiivnog ima kada ja na prvu loptu kada pogledam koliko ima ovog bold negativnog sa sve očajnim dođe mnogo više valjda nego pozoitivnog bold?
          Ali je vazno ono na kraju. Izbacio je negativnu energiju iz sebe. Oprostio Agasiju, oprostio Ramosu, vjerovao u sebe i svoje moci ...

          Pozitivno ima vecu tezinu. Ono sto je igrao 7 gemova u korist svoj stete tj. inateci se Ramosu, vremenu i Agasiju ima terepeutsku vrijednost.

          Definitivno vise pozitivnog.
          Last edited by NI; 02-06-17, 20:11.

          Comment


          • Agasi nije ni trebao da bude tu, NI propade ti teorija

            Novak: Andre was not supposed to be here today, he managed to reschedule certain things to come and I appreciate that. #RG17
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • A ne razumem šta je oprostio o Agasiju?
              sigpic

              Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
              But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Agasi nije ni trebao da bude tu, NI propade ti teorija
                Nasuprot, to pojacava teoriju. Kao odlozio je a opet mu je bio vazniji intervju.

                ------------------

                Olja,

                Ovo je ozbiljno pitanje, iako moze izgledati suprtno.

                Da li zanas zasto paun ima prekrasni ogromni rep, jelen velike rogove itd?

                Comment


                • Ček, ček, ipak sam sada ušla, ako ne računam dva kratka izleta za vreme meča, ništa nisam skoro čitala, tako da prvo prelistam....
                  sigpic

                  Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
                  But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

                  Comment


                  • Svaka čast NI.

                    Dodala bih još da mi se čini da je Novak u par momenata igrao u grču i u panici , kao i to da je ( bez obzira što ju je dosta i mašio ) dosta igrao i BH paralelu.
                    Imala sam utisak da je potcenio protivnika, da je u ovom meču želeo da uvežbava udarce, i da ima jači trening.
                    Onda je krenuo vetar, Novak je dosta izbacivao u aut, Švarcman je igrao taktički perfektno.
                    Ritern je bio vrlo klimav , a na momente odličan...
                    Počeo je da se nervira, onda i ona sudijska opomena
                    A onda inat
                    Sve u svemu, meni se čini da je ovo neki Rimski nivo, bar sa početka...
                    U svakom slučaju puno prostora za nadogradnju i napredak.
                    Šampion kakav je Novak ne sme da dozvoli katastrofalnu realizaciju brejk lopti...a to se desilo danas.

                    Novak o Agasiju , kao što sam i rekla, najverovatije će biti samo na najvećim turnirima...

                    Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.Ali
                    Ko sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred.
                    "When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."

                    Comment


                    • hahahaha
                      NI, ti si nepopravljivi optimista, samo se krijes iza analiza
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                        hahahaha
                        NI, ti si nepopravljivi optimista, samo se krijes iza analiza
                        Bojance,

                        Nadam se da se ne ljutis na izliv familijarnosti.

                        Ja vam uporno tvrdim da sam pesimista ali mi ne vjerujete. Ipak, vise sam realista nego pesimista. S vremenom sam naucio da pesimizam paralizira a realizam pobjedjuje.

                        Novak je morao uvjeravati Agasija da promijeni raspored i ostane malo duze. I uspio je. I onda Agasi ode da daje intervju, a siguran sam da je dobio bonus na kraju meca. Da sam ja Novak i da mi je to ucinio, poslao bih ga u 7 materinih. Ali Novak je pametniji, ikao je tesko vario tu knedlu koju je morao da proguta.
                        Last edited by NI; 02-06-17, 20:28.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by NI View Post
                          Bojance,

                          Nadam se da se ne ljutis na izliv familijarnosti.

                          Ja vam uporno tvrdim da sam pesimista ali mi ne vjerujete. Ipak, vise sam realista nego pesimista. S vremenom sam naucio da realizam pobjedjuje.

                          Novak je morao uvjeravati Agasija da promijeni raspored i ostane malo duze. I uspio je. I onda Agasi ode da daje intervju, a siguran sam da je dobio bonus na kraju meca. Da sam ja Novak i da mi je to ucinio, poslao bih ga u 7 materinih. Ali Novak je pametniji, ikao je tesko vario tu knedlu koju je morao da proguta.
                          Ne, ti si optimista, jer imas 6 puta boldovano negativno i 3 puta boldovano pozitivno i ti zakljucis da ima vise pozitivnog

                          A sto se tice Agasija, ipak vise verujem Djokovicevoj izjavi nego tvojoj konstrukciji
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • A zašto 3 ne bi bilo više od 6? Jesu li 3GS titule više od 6 ostalih turnira, tako je i NI izvukao pozitivu, mada je i 0 pozitivna.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by notorious View Post
                              A zašto 3 ne bi bilo više od 6? Jesu li 3GS titule više od 6 ostalih turnira, tako je i NI izvukao pozitivu, mada je i 0 pozitivna.
                              0 nije ni pozitivna ni negativna, je l' si ti imao matematiku u skoli?
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by notorious View Post
                                A zašto 3 ne bi bilo više od 6? Jesu li 3GS titule više od 6 ostalih turnira, tako je i NI izvukao pozitivu, mada je i 0 pozitivna.
                                Gdje si optimisto? Ako ista postoji crno, ti ces ga vidjeti. A ako ne vidis nista crno, ici ces okulisti.

                                Zato sto su bitne stvari pozitivne. U svkom trenutku kad je bio sabran, dominirao je Svarcmana. Plus je izbacio negativnu energiju iz sebe. I to je vaznije nego cinjenica da je pokazao da ga sintnice mogu ubaciti u totalnu apatiju pa i samodestrukciju kao oni dropovi na kraju prvog seta.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X