Originally posted by 80Vlado
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Indian Wells 2014. - BNP Paribas Masters 1000
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by shminka View Postne kažem da je greška u tome da nije izvršio korekciju...nego je rekao da je loptica vani i time odvratio Novaka od provjere...da je rekao da nije siguran, da je blizu...Novak bi tražio provjeru...
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostIsta diskusija kao prije 14 mjeseci. I ja ima isto misljenje. Bernadez nije tu da savjetuje Novaka nego ispravlja ocigledne greske.
Ok je to tvoje razmišljanje...ali sudije redovno savjetuju igrače...Bernardez je bio loš u tome...
Najbolje bi bilo da nema nikakve komunikacije izmedju sudije i igrača po tom pitanju...takvo je vjerovatno i pravilo...ali niko se toga ne pridržava...
Comment
-
Originally posted by shminka View PostOk je to tvoje razmišljanje...ali sudije redovno savjetuju igrače...Bernardez je bio loš u tome...
Najbolje bi bilo da nema nikakve komunikacije izmedju sudije i igrača po tom pitanju...takvo je vjerovatno i pravilo...ali niko se toga ne pridržava...
To nije moje misljenje, to su pravila. Ista su kad rade za I protiv Novaka.
Comment
-
Originally posted by proudNolee View PostGdje ćeš ti na mrežu sa tolikim nogamahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment